NRA announced that they are changing their “safety standards” to “guidelines”. The reason given by NRA for this is potential public confusion over the terminology used.
“A regulatory committee member voiced the concern that calling the guidelines the “New Safety Standards” may lead members of the public to the misunderstanding that following the guidelines ensures the safety of nuclear power plants.”
A guideline usually implies something discretionary and not a mandatory thing in the way a standard is. More on the differences here.
Exactly what NRA is attempting to do with this word change is concerning and not clear. Have they changed the mandatory nature of safety standards to be applied at nuclear plants?
The day before the NRA mentioned they want to make the goal for a nuclear disaster resulting in large releases of radiation to one in a million years per reactor. This is a deviation from the typical nuclear industry accident potential usually expressed in per reactor years spread across all operating reactors in the world. If the NRA has truly changed the mandatory nature of the upcoming safety standards this could have major implications for Japan and how other countries choose to adopt post-Fukushima safety changes.
This article would not be possible without the extensive efforts of the SimplyInfo research team
Join the conversation at chat.simplyinfo.org
© 2011-2018 SimplyInfo.org, Fukuleaks.org All Rights Reserved Content cited, quoted etc. from other sources is under the respective rights of that content owner. If you are viewing this page on any website other than http://www.simplyinfo.org (or http://www.fukuleaks.org) it may be plagiarized, please let us know. If you wish to reproduce any of our content in full or in more than a phrase or quote, please contact us first to obtain permission.