Good morning folks. Nice to see the 24-48 hours turned out to be a lot less!
I don't know if this has been posted before, but here you go. I chttp://translate.google.com/translate?js=n&prev=_t&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&layout=2&eotf=1&sl=ja&tl=en&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.fnn-news.com%2Fnews%2Fheadlines%2Farticles%2FCONN00198309.html (I dragged it through Google translate, so the link may show up as Googe, but it's ultimately from fnn-news.com
@Paul I saw on the Berkeley site where high levels of I-132 were found in milk. That indicates more fuel leaked out in #2 or #3.
by Bobby1 4/29/2011 1:14:25 PM
@Paul That's what we've been saying for a month.
by Jim Carver 4/29/2011 1:14:46 PM
If fission stopped on Mar. 11, there should only be trace amounts of I-131.
by Jim Carver 4/29/2011 1:16:36 PM
@Jim: As usual, you guys ahead of the game. Have Tepco actually admitted ongoing criticality yet though - I see they released this data only yesterday?
by Paul 4/29/2011 1:20:37 PM
@Paul Not really. It's like listening to a two headed creature, One says one thing, the other one says "naw, that guy, we have no evidence that is the case"!
by Jim Carver 4/29/2011 1:25:29 PM
It's not the absolute amounts of iodine, it's the amount relative to longer-lived isotopes such as cesium-137. More iodine might just mean more washing out of busted fuel rods. And even there we would need to control for other factors such as different melting and boiling points of iodine and cesium. I'm absolutely not competent to judge what's going on solely on the basis of absolute iodine-131 levels or even relative levels of iodine versus cesium.
That said, high levels of iodine relative to cesium SHOULD be explained as to this layperson it shouldn't be that way.
by General Armchair 4/29/2011 1:33:36 PM
For anyone wanting to see the NRC Webcast from yesterday (28 Apr), it's available here: video.nrc.gov For example, I selected MP3 and the downloaded audio file plays fine on VLC.
by Markfm 4/29/2011 1:34:01 PM
Japanese scientists to map radioactive contamination in Fukushima, includes strontium-90 measurements www.asahi.com
by Bobby1 4/29/2011 1:34:14 PM
@Markfm Could you give a quick synopsis of the NRC webcast? Anything worthwhile in it?
by General Armchair 4/29/2011 1:34:44 PM
NYT Greenblog covered it: green.blogs.nytimes.com I've just started listening to it, am downloading the MPEG4 now (which likely includes the video).
by Markfm edited by Markfm 4/29/2011 1:35:48 PM
@Markfm Thanks!
by General Armchair 4/29/2011 1:36:36 PM
Washington state cuts back on radiation sampling www.doh.wa.gov
by Bobby1 4/29/2011 1:41:01 PM
Hmmm from the synopsis in NYT Greenblog, no mention of any action to be taken for SFP or reracking to greater density. 10 years after 9/11 and the NRC's answer to that was to permit more fuel rod to be packed into spent fuel pools.
by General Armchair 4/29/2011 1:42:22 PM
Prime Minister's nuclear advisor resigns. Says nobody is listening to him. www.channelnewsasia.com
by Nancy 4/29/2011 1:47:03 PM
@nancy that could be interesting :)
by elainekirk 4/29/2011 1:58:26 PM
@elainekirk He sounded very upset. I hope he talks to the press in detail. I want to know what he was being ignored on and what his ideas are. Things seem to be so bungled and without any plan while this expert is being completely ignored.
by Nancy 4/29/2011 2:02:59 PM
If radioguy or Markfm see this, I have the better quality mpeg of the underwater SFP video but can't seem to make still images with what I have on my PC. Is there something in the Adobe suite that would make still captures out of the mpeg (I don't have all of the programs installed). I think i can get better video than what I have from the youtube version
by Nancy 4/29/2011 2:04:50 PM
@Nancy Download the free VLC (VideoLAN) player, and use it for high resolution screen captures (although that mpeg is not all that much better) -- Also, thank you so much for the link to the advisor's resignation story. I would not have wanted to miss that one before heading out for the day...
by Askwhy 4/29/2011 2:06:12 PM
UC Berkeley air sampling results www.nuc.berkeley.edu I-131 highest since Apr 16, Cs-134 highest since Apr 15, Cs-137 highest since Apr 18
by Bobby1 4/29/2011 2:07:32 PM
@Nancy www.videolan.org multiplatform, will handle any video, and can go frame by frame (well, the windows version can), screencaps, etc.
Yes, VLC is excellent as a video player (I did some work on it years ago, so I am biased). It has its own screen snapshot function, else you can pause and use ZScreen to capture. www.videolan.org
by Markfm edited by Markfm 4/29/2011 2:14:19 PM
Kyodo, Weather chief draws flak over plea not to release radiation forecasts english.kyodonews.jp
by Markfm 4/29/2011 2:17:02 PM
@Askwhy thanks. Have some basic large stills going live in a few minutes. Will try to get upgraded ones yet today to add in.
SFP reactor 4, two underwater video stills and comparison images of pre-quake sfp at reactor 3. You can see how unorderly #4 is now. Lots of things that don't look normal. Link is the top one on the main page of new items www.houseoffoust.com
by Nancy edited by elainekirk 4/29/2011 2:25:17 PM
@Nancy Excellent side-by-side with the SFP photos! Looking at those, there is one thing that is clear from all the 'pre-disaster' photos -- the SFP is a repeating grid throughout, segmented in different ways, but *without major gaps in the grids* -- in the underwater SFP footage, look at those huge gaps between the rack segments! Whoa...
by Askwhy 4/29/2011 2:29:00 PM
@Nancy Any idea what the "larger" grids are for? (On left side of the first pic you posted, extending off the top of the pic.)
by General Armchair 4/29/2011 2:33:40 PM
Can you imagine what a similar vid of #3 SPF would look like? OMG.
by General Armchair 4/29/2011 2:34:25 PM
@Nancy. Thank you! Great to have the comparison. Wow!
by Scilla 4/29/2011 2:38:42 PM
So... what happened on around Apr 15-17 to cause the big spike in radiation release? I-132 was picked up in Berkeley too.
by Bobby1 4/29/2011 2:38:52 PM
I tried using the mpeg from TEPCo, wasn't any larger or better quality for taking snapshots.
I am not sure what the larger diameter racks in the corner are. We need to ask Dean when he gets back. One thing he wanted to look for was burnt tops and I think there may be some but I don't know exactly what to look for. The racks appear to be partially gone around rods in one part. Looks like a huge gap in the middle. The one section lower middle that looks like the rack is gone and kind of a X pattern might be control rods? The bigger box grid on the left I have no clue. If you look at the box of rods in the center of the image, the ones toward the lower right look shiny and orderly and the ones top left in that rack look darker and muddy in appearance. I wonder if that is some that burnt.
by Nancy 4/29/2011 2:39:54 PM
@ Nancy... I loved your position statement on your web site... I'm gonna post it here.
by carabnr 4/29/2011 2:40:28 PM
@Bobby1 we really need an event timeline. The reactor report stats have a written timeline on the top left of the page
by Nancy 4/29/2011 2:40:43 PM
@carabnr Uh what part, from the statement?
by Nancy 4/29/2011 2:41:03 PM
STATEMENT ABOUT THE REACTOR BLUEPRINT AND TEPCO'S ACCUSATIONS
Very soon after the reactor disaster, a small version of a reactor elevation blueprint was circulating around various online forums discussing the Fukushima Daiichi reactor disaster.
About the same time frame I was doing image searches on Google.jp and found a publicly posted image of the same elevation blueprint that was of a larger size. This widely circulated image was available for anyone to look at on one of the largest search websites in the world. The copy I downloaded was freely available to anyone on the internet. The file poster left no information about how or why they had the image and left no identifying information. It did appear that the file could have been online from before the earthquake and tsunami and possibly since 2007 or earlier.
TEPCO, now that they have been publicly confronted with both their denials to the press that blueprints exist (or could be made available) and their claims that I am somehow violating some law by copying a publicly available image on my web site, I felt the need to make a statement.
The real question is why was this blueprint available on Google image search for months or longer?
Since your already here please consider some more important questions.
Why is TEPCO and the govt. of Japan not making all information easily and widely available online for the world to see? This issue greatly impacts the people in Japan, they deserve honest information now, not in hindsight ten years from now. They deserve the right to know accurate details so they may make decisions for themselves and their children's safety.
Why did the govt. of Japan raise the "safe" radiation level for children to that of a German nuclear plant worker?
Why did the Ministry of Defence not release heat images for April 21, 22, 23 and 25? Those dates coincide with increased heat events in the spent fuel pools in reactor 3 and 4. All information should be given to the public, not just the "good news".
I worry greatly for the safety of the people impacted by the earthquake, tsunami and the nuclear disaster. I can't even imagine losing everything in an instant and not knowing what to do nor having any tools to get your life back together. This incident with the nuclear power plant impacts the entire world. The massive amounts of radiation being dumped into the ocean impacts us all as does the radiation being put into the air that is already being found in water, soil and food in the US. I fear what may happen to both Japan and the larger world if Fukushima has a larger catastrophic failure, the releases could be exponentially more. Now is not the time to hide information or intimidate internet users or media reporters. Now is the time to tell everyone everything and solicit the help of the entire world to resolve this issue.
STATEMENT ABOUT THE REACTOR BLUEPRINT AND TEPCO'S ACCUSATIONS
Very soon after the reactor disaster, a small version of a reactor elevation blueprint was circulating around various online forums discussing the Fukushima Daiichi reactor disaster.
About the same time frame I was doing image searches on Google.jp and found a publicly posted image of the same elevation blueprint that was of a larger size. This widely circulated image was available for anyone to look at on one of the largest search websites in the world. The copy I downloaded was freely available to anyone on the internet. The file poster left no information about how or why they had the image and left no identifying information. It did appear that the file could have been online from before the earthquake and tsunami and possibly since 2007 or earlier.
TEPCO, now that they have been publicly confronted with both their denials to the press that blueprints exist (or could be made available) and their claims that I am somehow violating some law by copying a publicly available image on my web site, I felt the need to make a statement.
The real question is why was this blueprint available on Google image search for months or longer?
Since your already here please consider some more important questions.
Why is TEPCO and the govt. of Japan not making all information easily and widely available online for the world to see? This issue greatly impacts the people in Japan, they deserve honest information now, not in hindsight ten years from now. They deserve the right to know accurate details so they may make decisions for themselves and their children's safety.
Why did the govt. of Japan raise the "safe" radiation level for children to that of a German nuclear plant worker?
Why did the Ministry of Defence not release heat images for April 21, 22, 23 and 25? Those dates coincide with increased heat events in the spent fuel pools in reactor 3 and 4. All information should be given to the public, not just the "good news".
I worry greatly for the safety of the people impacted by the earthquake, tsunami and the nuclear disaster. I can't even imagine losing everything in an instant and not knowing what to do nor having any tools to get your life back together. This incident with the nuclear power plant impacts the entire world. The massive amounts of radiation being dumped into the ocean impacts us all as does the radiation being put into the air that is already being found in water, soil and food in the US. I fear what may happen to both Japan and the larger world if Fukushima has a larger catastrophic failure, the releases could be exponentially more. Now is not the time to hide information or intimidate internet users or media reporters. Now is the time to tell everyone everything and solicit the help of the entire world to resolve this issue.