Hmm, since EQ's are messured in ground, how about an explosion above ground, that riggered.....
by Veenie 7/8/2011 6:20:47 PM
@Edano A flea sneezed?
by M.I.A. 7/8/2011 6:21:11 PM
www.emsc-csem.org I think that EQ was a reflection from this one: Location manually reviewed by EMSC MSG_ID 110707232713 EMSC DATA_TYPE BULLETIN GSE2.0
english.kyodonews.jp Google Street View in disaster areas Shigeru Suganuma (L), mayor of Kesennuma, Miyagi Prefecture, shakes hands with an official of Google Inc. in the northeastern Japan city on July 8, 2011, in front of a vehicle used to take Street View pictures. Google said in a press conference in Kesennuma it will take Street View pictures of areas in five Japanese prefectures hit by the March quake and tsunami. (Kyodo) english.kyodonews.jp
Exterior covering for Fukushima reactor Photo shows a new exterior covering being constructed in Iwaki, Fukushima Prefecture, on June 28, 2011, for the building housing the No. 1 reactor at the Fukushima Nuclear Power Station in Fukushima Prefecture. The exterior covering for the building damaged by an explosion is intended to prevent the further spread of radioactive materials. (Kyodo) english.kyodonews.jp
@Edano Is a beautiful winter of blue sky and a minimum temp of 17 Cent. Next week I start going out again ;-))
by Majj 7/8/2011 6:31:29 PM
Investigation on nuclear crisis to involve hearing from 200 people
TOKYO, July 8, Kyodo
An independent panel investigating the causes of the nuclear crisis at the Fukushima Daiichi power plant plans to hear from several hundred people involved in the handling of the crisis, the panel's head said Friday.
Yotaro Hatamura, a researcher on human error, said during the second gathering of panel members that intensive investigation will be carried out during the period until the next meeting, which is scheduled for Sept. 27.
He also said at a press conference after the meeting that some hearings may be made open to the public if the person involved agrees, keeping in mind public figures such as senior officials of the government and of the plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Co. english.kyodonews.jp
by Edano 7/8/2011 6:32:20 PM
@Majj : ooh, i forgot there is winter. brrrrr. :)
by Edano 7/8/2011 6:32:52 PM
@Edano Rio de Janeiro winter is 3 days 17/20 cent. to 6/7 days of 25/26 cent.. Is fantastic :-)
by Majj 7/8/2011 6:34:09 PM
@Majj sounds cozy.
by Edano 7/8/2011 6:35:07 PM
Radiation levels within 80 km radius from Fukushima plant drop 20%
TOKYO, July 8, Kyodo
Radiation levels within a radius of 80 kilometers from the crippled Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant have dropped some 20 percent as a whole from two months earlier, the science ministry said Friday, releasing a radiation map of data collected by helicopter.
Radioactive substances have been washed away by rain and into rivers, while the presence of iodine with a short half-life has dropped, the Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology Ministry said.
Using a large high-sensitive radiation detector, a helicopter measured radiation levels 1 meter above the ground and those on the ground from May 31 through July 2, according to the ministry. Collected data were adjusted into figures as of July 2 to make the latest radiation map, which was compared with the previous map dated April 29. english.kyodonews.jp
by Edano 7/8/2011 6:35:25 PM
Excess level of radioactive cesium found in meat of Fukushima cow
Four municipalities around a nuclear power plant in Shizuoka Prefecture have asked the central government to expand the plant's official emergency zone, so their communities can be included in the event of a nuclear accident.
Mayors and representatives from the cities of Fujieda, Yaizu, Fukuroi and Iwata handed a petition requesting the change to nuclear crisis minister Goshi Hosono on Friday.
The mayors asked that the emergency planning zone around the Hamaoka nuclear power station be expanded from the current 10-kilometer radius to 30 kilometers.
The municipalities are all located 10 to 30 kilometers from the Hamaoka plant.
The petition notes that in the Fukushima accident, evacuation areas have now expanded beyond the zone initially mandated by the government.
The mayors said the municipalities are unable to draw up evacuation plans unless their locations are recognized within the emergency zone. They said the matter is raising concern among residents.
Hosono agreed the Fukushima accident revealed the inadequacy of a 10-kilometer radius, and said the government must promptly review the matter.
The operator of the Ikata nuclear power plant in western Japan says it will postpone restarting one of the plant's reactors because of opposition from local residents.
Shikoku Electric Power Company said on Friday that it decided not to resume operations at the No.3 reactor on Sunday as originally scheduled.
The utility halted operations at the reactor for regular inspection on April 29th, but reloaded it with fuel rods in late June to prepare for the restart.
The company said it did all it could to ease the concerns of local residents in light of the crisis at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant, including conducting detailed safety inspections of the reactor.
But it was still unable to gain the necessary support.
The utility says it plans to continue efforts to win the understanding of local municipalities and residents so that it can restart the reactor as soon as possible.
Secret nuclear reactor leak at NC University is like students 'getting x-ray'. For five days of radiation leaking from a reactor at North Carolina State University's Burlington Nuclear Engineering Laboratory, causing the research facility to close, the public was not informed reportedly due to the radiation being so low, it is like someone getting an x-ray. www.examiner.com
by Majj 7/8/2011 6:44:23 PM
TEPCO to inject nitrogen into No. 3 reactor
The operator of the crippled Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant is preparing to connect pipes to the plant's No. 3 reactor to inject nitrogen to prevent a hydrogen explosion.
Tokyo Electric Power Company workers spent 10 minutes in the reactor building on Friday to determine whether pipes can be connected to the reactor's containment vessel.
The utility says the workers confirmed that the reactor's connections are intact, and that work to lay the pipes can start on Saturday.
The firm had sent a robot equipped with a camera into the building to check the situation, but the device was blocked and could not finish the work.
Stably cooling the plant's reactors and preventing hydrogen explosions are the pillars of the utility's plan to bring the facility under control.
Nuclear crisis minister Goshi Hosono says that around July 17th, he hopes to begin studying whether to lift advisory designating areas where residents are required to be prepared to evacuate in case of emergency.
But the work to lay the pipes has already been delayed, and the Nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency must confirm safety for several days before beginning the nitrogen injection.
It remains uncertain whether the injection can be carried out by July 17th as scheduled.
"In the 1950's, pregnant women were routinely given x-rays to their stomachs. Women were told 'low-dose radiation is harmless,' by medical societies and government officials. British physician Alice Stewart published studies showed that babies irradiated in-utero had a nearly double the risk of dying of cancer by age 10, and her results were matched by other researchers. Not until then did doctors introduce ultra-sound, that emits no radiation, for pregnant women."
Continue reading on Examiner.com Secret nuclear reactor leak at NC University is like students 'getting x-ray' - National Human Rights | Examiner.com www.examiner.com
by Majj 7/8/2011 6:48:36 PM
@Edano, human error is a bit of a misnomer when Unit 1 shutdown is considered. The operators of Unit 1 followed misconstrued instructions: brainmindinst.blogspot.com . That is more than just human error. Furthermore, the debate on whether or not to use saltwater the day after the quake was blatantly deliberate.
by Peter Melzer 7/8/2011 6:48:50 PM
Systematic involvement suspected in Genkai scandal
Kyushu Electric Power Company says its nuclear energy division may have been involved in a systematic effort to manipulate public opinion to support the restarting of its Genkai nuclear power plant.
Last month, the government held a meeting to explain safety measures to local residents before restarting the No.2 and 3 reactors at the plant in Saga Prefecture.
The meeting was broadcast live on TV and the internet, and viewers were invited to submit their opinions by e-mail or fax.
It was learned on Friday that the 2 of the utility's executives, including a vice president in charge of the nuclear energy division, instructed their subordinates to help with the effort, referring to the meeting.
The company previously admitted that employees of the utility and 4 affiliated firms -- more than 1,500 people in total -- were instructed to send e-mails during the meeting in support of the reactors' restart.
The 2 reportedly felt that the meeting was important because it took place just prior to Kyushu Electric's general shareholders' meeting.
They were also reportedly interested in the opinions sent to the meeting.
Industry Minister Banri Kaieda said he was deeply disappointed at the utility's behavior in light of the crisis at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant. He said he would like to prevent a recurrence of the scheme by keeping power utilities in check.
@Edano have you seen the wikileaks www.wikileaks.ch takes awhile to load first time
by elainekirk 7/8/2011 6:53:25 PM
@elainekirk tx, will look thru these.
by Edano 7/8/2011 6:57:11 PM
@Edano The Ikata plant is where plutonium was found nearby (the info has subsequently been expunged from link). A reactor there has recently been loaded with MOX fuel.
by Bobby1 7/8/2011 7:05:16 PM
Hi guys, I found this site. www.radiation.org/ And then I took the link to Dr Sternglass's book.
by Jo 7/8/2011 7:42:37 PM
@Bobby1 if you find a cached verion of that can u post the link or take a screenshot?
1 of 3 video's of the Monju accident in 95 I cant help comparing the workers protection including air tanks compared to what we see the tepco workers using 16yrs later
by elainekirk 7/8/2011 8:17:13 PM
@Bobby1 Oh yes that is it! Awesome! Thank you! I will save a copy of the web page so we have it on hand. I find it concerning they have even a small amount of plutonium outside the plant. I need to look where this plant is in relation to the spread from Fukushima. IIRC they have not been running MOX a long time there. I have to wonder if they did a release at some point hoping nobody would notice.
by lillymunster 7/8/2011 8:23:23 PM
@lillymunster It's over 500 miles, I know that. When I first saw that, I thought it came from Fuku, but it is likely that it is from Ikata. Do NPP's typically contaminate their surroundings with plutonium?
by Bobby1 7/8/2011 8:28:16 PM
NISA to be separated from METI. Then make it a mandatory 20 year prison sentence if anyone from NISA accepts a gift from the nuke industry or colludes with hiding evidence. That would be progress www.sfgate.com
by lillymunster 7/8/2011 8:33:56 PM
@Bobby1 EEP! We didn't determine if the CA plutonium was local or FUKU fallout? Has FUKU plutonium been found many places outside the region or is that still being hidden? Ikata is down by Okinawa. I don't know what would be considered background in that area but those levels even though they are small sound pretty high to be old bomb testing. My understanding is there should be zero emissions and certainly not plutonium. We should ask Dean when he stops by about what NPP's consider routine emissions as far as type and sources that would be expected to sometimes emit.
by lillymunster 7/8/2011 8:37:46 PM
I ran across something on Twitter from the Univ. of Tokyo, whatever science department handles nuclear medicine and some offshoot aspects are involved in some radiation testing. They mentioned doing soil and plant samples and having some involvement with whole body scanning. I will try to dig up their Twitter name and blog page so people can look into what they are up to. Might be useful information from a better source.
by lillymunster 7/8/2011 8:40:03 PM
Ikata is still on their first load of MOX Ikata - 3 loaded a partial MOX fuel core for the cycle beginning February 24, 2010.[1]
by lillymunster 7/8/2011 8:41:22 PM
@lillymunster The CA plutonium was definitely Fuku-related, because there was a sudden huge rise in its level. Unless of course some other nuclear issue happened there a few days after the explosions.
by Bobby1 7/8/2011 8:41:56 PM
@lillymunster they got 24 assemblies in the '09 shipment
by elainekirk 7/8/2011 8:48:31 PM
@Bobby1 Ah. I had not followed up on the CA plutonium thing. It would be interesting to find out if plutonium shows up anywhere between Fuku and Ikata. That would be a sign that some traveled that way and could be Fuku. If there is a big gap of no plutonium that it would likely be from Ikata. That is a big deal because they have been pushing how totally safe MOX fuel is. If Ikata is leaking plutonium that is another very bad sign for the MOX fuel industry. Ralph or Rbeaner mentioned a day or so ago that MOX fuel increases the amount of radiation 30% in an accident. I didn't ask for a source but certainly a very interesting factoid.
by lillymunster 7/8/2011 8:48:54 PM
@elainekirk I think that is what the loaded in 2010
by lillymunster 7/8/2011 8:49:17 PM
There was plutonium detected in Matsudo (by a lay person on a video), but that is northeast of Tokyo, and is much closer to the plant than Ikata.
by Bobby1 7/8/2011 8:51:01 PM
@Bobby1 that would be along the path.
by lillymunster 7/8/2011 8:54:05 PM
@lillymunster Yes, it's possible that it's from Fuku, but without extensive measurements all over Japan, how can we really know how far the plutonium got?
by Bobby1 7/8/2011 8:55:33 PM
@Bobby1 exactly. We can hope that the data is eventually released or civilian sources start documenting it.
by lillymunster 7/8/2011 9:00:36 PM
@lillymunster For the US & Canada, too.
by Bobby1 7/8/2011 9:05:19 PM
Hmm Something does NOT make sense here. Ikata 3 was supposedly shut down for refueling this April and had a fuel reload in June. According to Wikipedia Ikata 3 had MOX installed in Feb of 2010. Reactors usually go 18-19 months before needing a reload. April would have been 14 months. So why such a short run? www3.nhk.or.jpen.wikipedia.org