Japan Earthquake

Japan Earthquake | Page 1865

@dean Hi! @Lilly @all The GoJ and Tepco have done an amazing job deflecting attention from 3 and the MOX fuel in it. I think the silence speaks volumes.
by LM 7/9/2011 1:37:10 AM

lol yeh ha ha.. hey.. how come some times my name is there.. BY DEAN and some times it says by you?
by dean 7/9/2011 1:37:19 AM

Oh duh. When you post. Not sure I think it is some of the same oddity why people can't see avatars sometimes
by lillymunster 7/9/2011 1:38:04 AM

@Lilly There were about 10 this time and one taking notes on a clipboard as he turned back to look at 1. I'm not sure but they seemed to be better covered this time.
by LM 7/9/2011 1:38:31 AM

@lilly .. I think every one was use to seeing the bicycle
by dean 7/9/2011 1:39:33 AM

@LM I am looking for an early screen shot of the live tepco cam if you come across one
by elainekirk 7/9/2011 1:39:35 AM

@elainekirk how far back do you need a screenshot of?
by lillymunster 7/9/2011 1:41:04 AM

@lillymunster as early as possible and its aspect ratio needs to be intact
by elainekirk 7/9/2011 1:42:34 AM

@lillymunster did you grab the cooper 2010 report? I posted still hunting the diagrams list
by elainekirk 7/9/2011 1:44:21 AM

@elainekirk I will see what I have saved.

Saved cooper 2010
by lillymunster 7/9/2011 1:49:09 AM

@Elaine @Lilly When did the Tepco live cam begin? I can't remember. I'll make sure I pass an early one on if I come across one. I don't have any saved myself.
by LM 7/9/2011 1:49:49 AM

@LM I can't remember for sure. I have lots of TBS cam through May. Then this June 10 as the earliest TEPCo live cam one so maybe somewhere in that date range?
by lillymunster 7/9/2011 1:57:32 AM

TBy JUNKO HORIUCHI Kyodo political activism, have started taking to the streets to urge the government to protect their children from radiation leaking from the crippled Fukushima No. 1 nuclear plan
by Majj 7/9/2011 1:58:09 AM

@lillymunster ty I can try with that if anyone has a daylight one it would help
by elainekirk 7/9/2011 1:59:53 AM

@elainekirk that is quite the load of legal language
by lillymunster 7/9/2011 2:03:00 AM

@lillymunster coulldnt make sense of it myself
by elainekirk 7/9/2011 2:14:55 AM

TEPCo claims tsunami was twice as tall and ground fell at both plants by up to 65cm www3.nhk.or.jp
by lillymunster 7/9/2011 2:15:41 AM

these decommissioning figures from coopers are quite clear though
adamswebsearch.nrc.gov^pbntad01&LogonID=277a1d250c99af936efb15f2b203f1c1&id=111020075
by elainekirk 7/9/2011 2:16:29 AM

@all This is really strange and frankly scary. I went to the EPA site to look at San Diego levels and all of the levels were altered..I've been looking once a day for the last 4 months. All the recent beta levels were halved and spikes were flattened out. This is what was posted on the page: This site contains information and data from March 11, 2011 to June 30, 2011. EPA has returned to routine RadNet operations. This site will continue to be available for historical and informative purposes.

For real-time air monitoring data, please visit the EPA RadNet website and Central Data Exchange. To view both current and historical laboratory data, please visit our Envirofacts database.
I'm freaked..I think it's an outrage if they're changing data like that!
by LM 7/9/2011 2:17:41 AM

@LM be the new 'panic and alarm' clause..mission creep...
by elainekirk 7/9/2011 2:19:18 AM

@Elaine I just noticed they cut off the data at June 30. There were some major spikes since then. I might have freaked prematurely. I can't help feeling a little deceived..even if it may be irrational. They aren't showing real-time beta data on EPA site anymore. There is some at Envirofacts.
by LM 7/9/2011 2:24:18 AM

@elainekirk the last NRC link is messed up. I can't determine what needs to be modified to make it work.
by lillymunster 7/9/2011 2:26:45 AM

@LM That is really concerning. I can't think of a good reason to modify that. I think someone found other data alterations last week. Can't remember who though.
by lillymunster 7/9/2011 2:28:01 AM

@Elaine, levels in 3 are pretty high if they have to be in there any period of time.
by lillymunster 7/9/2011 2:30:02 AM

@all Off topic question: When was the next outage for fuel re-loading scheduled for at Fukushima I - 3? Do we know?
by smoss 7/9/2011 2:30:32 AM

@smoss Fuel load was late Sept-early Oct based on media reports. So 18-19 months later.
by lillymunster 7/9/2011 2:31:21 AM

@lillymunster adamswebsearch.nrc.gov^pbntad01&LogonID=277a1d250c99af936efb15f2b203f1c1&id=111020075
or
tinyurl.com
by elainekirk 7/9/2011 2:31:53 AM

@Lilly They claim they're leaving the data through June 30 for historical purposes but I find it interesting that, at least here in San Diego, they chose to cut off the data before an even more significant spike after a drop off. Even if the data wasn't manipulating they're lying by omittion
by LM 7/9/2011 2:33:09 AM