
@Diane_NJ It is really hard to watch someone struggle like that, easy to relate to if you have
kids.
by lillymunster 7/12/2011 2:44:41 PM

@RadioGuy thanks, are they finding verifiable statistics now?
by lillymunster 7/12/2011 2:45:15 PM

@Peter Melzer I had thought about doing so but it is hard to pick out what stories are worthwhile and what ones are not. Many times a news source will only have one good story in the national news. So the aggregator would put them all in or if you use a keyword type you could get all sorts of results. If we can find a reliable way to auto sort that works I would sure set it up. I manually read through all these each morning anyways so the only extra work is cutting and pasting the links into a post.
by lillymunster 7/12/2011 2:47:31 PM

@RadioGuy Seattle had the rainwater story. All the box filter data for Seattle should be on EPA Radnet. Could this end up being a hot spot?
by lillymunster 7/12/2011 2:48:41 PM

The discussion of internal vs. external radiation doses and that the survey of residents is far too late in happening. This is on NHK. It seems like things are now evolving really fast with people figuring out about exposure, safe limits and where the govt. is screwing up or has lied to people.
www.nhk.or.jpby lillymunster 7/12/2011 2:56:51 PM

@RadioGuy How does that relate to Seattle? Do they share wind currents or separate?
by lillymunster 7/12/2011 2:57:20 PM

I had an idea the other day. How much would it cost and where is a lab that could test soil, water or foods for contamination? NGO's in Japan were sending things to France for testing as were some farmers. Is there somewhere US we could? Could we find a university like Berkeley to do so? It would be interesting to get samples from around the US or other places thought to get fallout and develop a citizen survey since the EPA is failing at their job.
by lillymunster 7/12/2011 3:04:40 PM

@Bobby1 was that a case of govt. pressuring the private lab?
by lillymunster 7/12/2011 3:07:20 PM

I remember seeing some well water testing companies that test for some radiation.
by lillymunster 7/12/2011 3:08:23 PM

Private wells are routinely testing for radiation but it seems to focus on alpha rads. Are some of the ones we should be looking for other types?
www.epa.govby lillymunster 7/12/2011 3:11:03 PM

These guys do radiation testing and seem to do water-soil-food
www.emsl.com www.emsl.comby lillymunster 7/12/2011 3:14:03 PM

@Peter Melzer would those radon kits pick up other things?
by lillymunster 7/12/2011 3:14:22 PM

@Bobby1 if we could get those tested for reasonably enough we could get a variety of people to volunteer to send in samples? This could be interesting. I wonder if Berkeley would be willing to do citizen gathered samples to broaden their testing?
by lillymunster 7/12/2011 3:18:34 PM

@Bobby1 LOL. Then maybe one of these private labs would be a better venue.
by lillymunster 7/12/2011 3:24:34 PM

@Peter Melzer the radon kit or the simple geiger device?
by lillymunster 7/12/2011 3:25:33 PM

@Peter Melzer do you know anything about the DIY geiger counters that hook up to an iphone?
by lillymunster 7/12/2011 3:26:49 PM

@RadioGuy that is too bad, they had the only food testing info. something like safecast but for food could be really interesting...
by lillymunster 7/12/2011 3:27:47 PM

Reverse osmosis systems used to combat radiation in well water in Montana
brendonbosworth.wordpress.comby lillymunster 7/12/2011 3:29:33 PM

@RadioGuy I just ignore those "safe like flying" disclaimers and look at just the numbers vs. those max numbers we collected early on.
by lillymunster 7/12/2011 3:30:18 PM