ScribbleLive

@elainekirk yes, grabbed it for the site

Symposium on the Accident of
2011 NIRS - 2011 NIRS - IAEA IAEA -- REAC/TS Training Course: REAC/TS Training Course: International Medical Management of Rad International Medical Management of Radiation Incidents iation Incidents
TEPCO TEPCO Fukushima Fukushima Daiichi Daiichi Nuclear Nuclear Power Power Station Station
-What was seen and not seen by Others? -What was seen and not seen by Others?--
www.nirs.go.jp
should I look see if I can find what was discussed AT THhis ?

@lillymunster or to prepare for the (inevitable) next one

@Ian yes we had lots of quakes in august. and we had the high >10 Sv readings around #1 and steam coming out of the soil and >400 Sv/hr in the rpv. but the 4 cities all are about 300 km from fuku and positioned in all directions from fuku, nearly in a circle. it's hard to find an explanation.

GOVERNMENT  OF JAPAN
September 2011

１．The occurrence of The Great East Earthquakes
Unprecedented challenge for Japan since 3・11 ・・・3
Emergency efforts ・・・4
Foreign assistance and rescue efforts ・・・6
Cause of the Accident and Damage at Fukushima Dai-ichi
Nuclear Power Station ・・・7
Nuclear Power Stations Nuclear Reactors near Epicenter of
the Earthquake ・・・8
２．Damages, current situation and the Government,
the Local Government and Private sector of
Japan's response
Macroeconomic impact ・・・9
Estimated Economic Damage of the Tohoku-Pacific Ocean
Earthquake and Plan for Reconstruction ・・・10
Speedy reconstruction of infrastructure ・・・11
Impact on Energy Supply / Demand in Japan ・・・12
Electric supply/demand up to this summer ・・・13
Speedy recovery of supply chain beyond expectation ・・・14
Utmost effort to settle Fukushima NPS accident ・・・15
Rigorous and intensive monitoring ・・・16
Current Status of “Roadmap towards Restoration from the
Accident at Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station,
TEPCO” (Revised edition) ・・・17
Points of Progress Status of “Roadmap towards Restoration
from the Accident at Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power
Station,TEPCO” ・・・19
Atmospheric Readings within 100km ・・・20
Atmospheric Readings in Tokyo, Osaka and Sapporo ・・・21
Ensure the safety of food and products ・・・22
Safety of Food ・・・23
Government Actions to Ensure the Safety of Beef and Other
Food ・・・24
Safety of Fishery Products ・・・25
Safety of Drinking Water ・・・26
Safety of Industrial Products ・・・27
Radiation in Dairy-life ・・・28
３．Road to recovery
Reconstruction open to the world ・・・29
Basic Guidelines for Reconstruction in response to the Great
East Japan Earthquake（decided on July 29,2011） ・・・30
On Strategies for Revitalizing Japan（August 5, 2011） ・・・31
Decision of the Energy and Environment Council（July 29,
2010） ・・・35
４．Assistance from overseas
Map of sites where rescue teams from foreign countries,
regions, and international organizations are operating (3rd
August)
www.kantei.go.jp ・・・3

@elainekirk Kashiwazaki was the only area that rejected MOX use IIRC. There were all those stories around July of power companies stacking meetings and email feedback with employees posing as citizens who wanted MOX

and why doesn't tepco do that ?????

@Edano corporations have no sympathy or involvement with society. Their only goal is to make money. All their efforts are going into censoring, PR and legal maneuvering to avoid lawsuits. This is all they do and expecting a corporation to do more without a good enough threat from something powerful enough to crush them is wishful thinking.

lick them up.

Did we know that Japan have just this month submitted a new report to the IAEA?
www.meti.go.jp
The Ministerial Declaration and the Chair’s Summary of the Conference’s plenary
session state expectations towards Japan for the continued provision of information. The
government recognizes that it is incumbent upon Japan to continue to provide accurate
information regarding the accident to the international community, including lessons
learned through the accident. In accordance with this approach the Government of Japan
decided to compile information on the state of affairs subsequent to the June report in
the form of an additional report and submit it to the IAEA on the occasions of the Board
of Governors meeting and the General Conference.

@RadioGuy thanks! Just made coffee too. :-)

@RadioGuy I wonder that also when you look at the real cost of the massive decontamination, or evacuating everyone that really should be. The cost is staggering. I wonder how it matches up with the total finances of the govt. Japan is an advanced first world country but they are finite in resources and land.

My opinion on this mess is they should be evacuating everyone out of the 50km zone and further around that north west blob of high radiation. Then go from the least contaminated area and work your way back. That makes the further out areas as safe as can be and also the ones most likely to succeed. Then go incrementally into the higher areas attempting to decontaminate until you find that the progress vs. the available efforts don't make sense. Call that the no go zone border.

Does anyone know where I could find some stats on all the people who worked at Chernobyl or got exposed but don't have any compensation for related illnesses? Reading the blog post on the faux symposium from earlier today. Would be a good tie in to talk about all the people left without help after Chernobyl.