ScribbleLive

These figures contain readings over a million and they are gov not tepco or am I reading data wrong www.mext.go.jp

George_Gibb has got a really good thing started here. Thanks, everybody, for keeping up such a truly exemplary quality of decent discourse. And also for your diligence and every effort to sustain our highwater mark. Let's keep this up, guys. We rock, truly.
Well, umm, might it be that one mission-critical thing this worldwide civil society information community of ours can do is venture beyond our current level of activity (passively sniffing, filtering, quasi-analyzing) and level up by leveraging our contacts on the ground in Japan to proactively smoke out crucial but solid, credible info: health progress of workers, physical status updates on each reactor, current metrics of ambient radiation status, insider Tepco plans, industry second-opinion sources, etc? If potential information sources / whistleblowers feel they can trust us enough, then we take our first steps from being noise to being news. By becoming the go-to web destination for this subject, we begin to fulfill our unstated aspiration to be of some use to the world in the wake of Fukushima. Needless to say, we should always tread with care and discernment. Nuff said.

Thanks, @Natalie. Hypothetically, when we have gained credibility with the kind of solid, beneficial information that we can deliver through our extended network and resources, other parties can be expected to "go to" us -- news outlets, orgs, etc. Right now, I wouldn't be surprised if we are already on the radar of audacious infoseekers.