
@elainekirk not that I have heard of yet.
by lillymunster 6/8/2011 1:29:41 PM

@trh probably a good thing but will present a major challenge for Japan to deal with their power needs. I think part of the reason Germany was able to shut down their reactors is the geographic size of the country. If you have a nuclear accident in Germany it could make a huge percentage of the country uninhabitable. Same goes for Japan, they have a finite amount of land. I think this is why the US and Russia are seeing less urgency, the concept of ruining a huge percentage of your land doesn't sink in when the countries are a big land mass.
by lillymunster 6/8/2011 1:32:36 PM


finally a picture of how they load/unload a fuel cask! archive.greenpeace.org

OMG !! W7VOA Steve Herman
Tokyo announces expanded radiation monitoring in Japanese capital. At present, official data recorded at only 1 bldg. in Shinjuku.
twitter.com!/W7VOA
by elainekirk 6/8/2011 1:38:02 PM

AH! FOUND IT! "(B) The licensee shall store un-irradiated MOX fuel assemblies only
within a spent fuel pool, located within a vital area, so that access to
the un-irradiated MOX fuel assemblies requires passage through at least
two physical barriers and the water barrier combined with the additional
measures detailed in this section."
edocket.access.gpo.govMox needs to be stored in a SFP
by lillymunster 6/8/2011 1:46:11 PM

I think Majj is really onto something with the ballast water issue. IIRC does Sendai have a big shipping port? The water rad levels in the major ports in Japan is obviously an issue.
by lillymunster 6/8/2011 1:47:44 PM

@nancy my ram doesnt like that pdf think I am going to have to get a new desktop in the near future
by elainekirk 6/8/2011 1:55:09 PM

@Markfm I have a news report of MOX being stored in a SFP, the bad assemblies that were sent back. Hard to find anything on Japanese requirements since pretty much everything is voluntary.
by lillymunster 6/8/2011 1:55:55 PM

@elainekirk upload it to google docs to read?
by lillymunster 6/8/2011 1:59:53 PM

@nancy good thinking @veenie Quake observations
www.voanews.comby elainekirk 6/8/2011 2:02:21 PM

@Kristian I asked about that also. It would concentrate even more radioactivity in the water. But the water is already highly radioactive. So more highly radioactive water or slightly less really highly radioactive water. My only guess why they don't at least with 3-4 spent fuel pools is it might make the radioactivity airborne because they spray those two with hoses. The things they can still water with internal systems I really don't understand why they don't reuse water.
by lillymunster 6/8/2011 2:15:01 PM

If your interested in learning a bunch about MOX fuel handling I am reading this US based document. Has lots of info about how MOX is handled and why.
docs.google.comby lillymunster 6/8/2011 2:16:02 PM

@Markfm once they clean it. They won't reuse it untreated.
by lillymunster 6/8/2011 2:16:51 PM