Long story. even if everything worked correctly, failures would have happened.
by Ralph Unger 3/27/2011 5:57:03 AM
@meretisa. You and your shaman could be right. The problem is that statistically the world and science folks at large don't buy this. So, it's not you. It's the stats. I say respect the stats so your credibility is not laughed at. I have great respect for you and others like you but the world is not there with you. It's affects all of us posting here.
by quantman07 3/27/2011 5:57:03 AM
so the water in the plant was 400millisieverts when the workers were exposed. does anyone remember how many times normal that was?
by marie rich 3/27/2011 5:57:06 AM
@VeenOui - No it doesn't look the same, either the sun went behind the clouds or they're tinkering with the white balance on the camera.
by JMV 3/27/2011 5:57:29 AM
@quantman07 Please stay on topic...
by ids 3/27/2011 5:57:52 AM
The difficulty now is that with such extreme levels of radiation, how will they continue to prevent the situation from worsening. When it comes to this situation, there are no experts, only informed speculation, because we have no precedence. Chernobyl was entirely different with a realm of problems wholly unlike these.
by Bev 3/27/2011 5:58:01 AM
looks like a blue filter is on it. maybe to hide a xenon glow...lol
by marie rich 3/27/2011 5:58:18 AM
@Ralph Unger I understand the batteries lasted approx 1.5 hours rather than the 8 hours they were designed to provide.
by Gordon 3/27/2011 5:58:33 AM
new pic in 2 minutes...we'll see I guess
by worldradioman 3/27/2011 5:58:41 AM
@Marie --normal for cooling water or normal for background? The workers were exposed to 2-6 Sv total. Water now coming from reactor #2 is 1 Sv/hr.
by Alaskan 3/27/2011 5:58:43 AM
@ids. Ok, will do.
by quantman07 3/27/2011 5:59:17 AM
I'm off to bed, goodnight everyone.
by Grizzly 3/27/2011 5:59:32 AM
@Grizzly Nite
by George Gibb 3/27/2011 5:59:44 AM
@marie - Maybe it's smurfcam?
by FradyKat 3/27/2011 6:00:04 AM
GN , Grizzly .... sweet dreams ...
by elalak 3/27/2011 6:00:09 AM
So basically the BBC and NHK reports just confirm what we already know
by George Gibb 3/27/2011 6:00:35 AM
Is it clear whether the workers were pulled out of the entire plant or only Reactor 2?
by Andy 3/27/2011 6:00:37 AM
Updated limits are from 100 mSV/hr to 250 mSv/hr. In my book that is sign in to cancerville.
by Ralph Unger 3/27/2011 6:01:16 AM
@Andy both reports are pinned at top
by George Gibb 3/27/2011 6:01:22 AM
@alaskan They said workers had a dose rate of 170-180msv, and said what the surface of the water was - I thought 400msv, but at the time remember thinking it didn't make sense. should have been in bequrels, I thought. anybody remember link?
by marie rich 3/27/2011 6:01:39 AM
@Andy @George Gibb Yes and No
by Jim Carver 3/27/2011 6:01:54 AM
@Alaskan: Link please. I am getting very frustrated by the personal commentaries without support. Without same, we are left to speculation or time wasted searching for corroboration.
by Karen Warren 3/27/2011 6:02:01 AM
@Andy: Workers are not allowed in turbine rooms of all 3 reactors as far as I know. I don;t think any spraying is going on since radioactive levels are much higher
by Optim 3/27/2011 6:02:19 AM
@VeenOui - Could be the white balance is not adjusted for cloudy days.
by JMV 3/27/2011 6:02:48 AM
@optim @George @Jim Thanks
by Andy 3/27/2011 6:02:52 AM
@Karen, see Kyoto news. I've posted the link 3 times in the past 2 hours.
by Alaskan 3/27/2011 6:03:03 AM
NHK world news at 3pm japan time has no new info...... Showing the same interview over and over and over again
by Optim 3/27/2011 6:03:09 AM
@Alaskan and I posted it twice.
by Jim Carver 3/27/2011 6:03:37 AM
Reuters limits my posts to facts with links, no link no post. Unless I an an expert in the field :-).
by Ralph Unger 3/27/2011 6:04:29 AM
I think it is good practice that if you are just joining or rejoing the discussion to go back a few pages and catch up before commenting. Any thoughts?
by Sinthia Domina 3/27/2011 6:04:56 AM
@Sin Agree
by NiteSpawn 3/27/2011 6:05:25 AM
[OPINION] I lived in Japan long enough to garner many Japanese relatives. The public there has been acutely suspicious of politicians, militarists, bureaucrats & TEPCO for several decades. There is surprisingly little internal obedience to a national ideology --much less than in the USA-- however there is an extraordinary amount of pragmatic obedience to the social contract. The Japanese public is extremely worried right now but the social directive is "do not sow panic". Cultural cohesion allows the Japanese people to self-govern as a cooperative whole even as they are regularly disturbed & disappointed by the inadequacies of government & corporate leaders. Japan is almost entirely run by middle managers at work & family matriarchs at home. A consensus-oriented, highly reflective society will have a lot of difficulty making the decision to evacuate Sendai (1MM) let alone Tokyo, however, if it became necessary, they would figure out a way to do it . . .
by Grizzly edited by George Gibb 3/27/2011 6:06:24 AM
2pm here. Gotta sleep. Hoping that tomorrow morning there is some good news. OR at least truth about what;s going on so that local Japanese folks can take right and timely decisions
CONSIDERATION: I keep thinking about the stigma that survivors of Hiroshima and Nagasaki have had to endure and how Fukushima evacuees will now have the same alienation.
by Sinthia Domina 3/27/2011 6:08:04 AM
@openmind Looks too crisp... very different that usual. also washed with blue. odd.
by Meretisa 3/27/2011 6:08:08 AM
@Apollo my exchanges with the Japanese agree with your viewpoint. "I know I am being lied to ,but I must agree."
by Ralph Unger 3/27/2011 6:08:23 AM
It has definitely been slowly taking on a bluer cast as the day went on... or the added yellow of morning clear sun compensated?
by worldradioman 3/27/2011 6:08:37 AM
@Alaskan found reuters story about workers uk.reuters.com