@carabnr very. If it fails it has some very bad implications. They have a construction company contracted to try to shore things up but no word if or when they will start work or if they can still
by Nancy 5/8/2011 2:54:59 AM
What do you think will happen if #4 falls?
by carabnr 5/8/2011 2:55:55 AM
I'm sure they must. Anyway, siting sightlines via googleearth projections is iffy; :)
by radioguy 5/8/2011 2:56:21 AM
@radioguy Oh don't I know.
by JMV 5/8/2011 2:56:58 AM
@carabnr Markfm laid out a pretty scary scenario in Teppylingo last night :)
by radioguy 5/8/2011 2:57:03 AM
@carabnr you would have spent and non spent fuel all over the ground in the rubble. What the releases or technical reactions in a pile like that someone like Dean might have a better idea. My guess is it would burn. Would cause a real problem dealing with the plant area if it did.
by Nancy 5/8/2011 2:57:16 AM
on cam I can get full screen if i click again on black screen that loads
by Cat 5/8/2011 2:57:17 AM
@radioguy what was Mark's take?
by Nancy 5/8/2011 2:57:44 AM
how many hours ago. On this site?
by carabnr 5/8/2011 2:58:22 AM
let me see if I can find it. Yes, here, in a blast of dark humor nearly 24 hours ago?
by radioguy 5/8/2011 2:59:33 AM
can anyone tell if the cam feed is live or relayed later? I have tried to check whether dawn and nightfall are at the correct times. I thought that they were, but then it was light when i expected dark, so not sure now.
by Cat 5/8/2011 3:00:25 AM
@Cat living in Japan it seems pretty accurate in terms of day and night.
by bo 5/8/2011 3:03:12 AM
This headline made me laugh, not in a good way. Of course the radiation is lower inside 1, it is all outside now by the looks of the webcam. timesofindia.indiatimes.com
by Nancy 5/8/2011 3:03:17 AM
A I recall it was a giddy rendition of carefree comments about SFP falling and blowing out the sides, flooding down into the decimated R3 and knocking out the RPV on the way tu undermingint R2 subbasement or something...
by radioguy 5/8/2011 3:03:26 AM
But i have to get out of here for my show soon, so I think I'll stop looking for it.
by radioguy 5/8/2011 3:04:09 AM
@radioguy I thought maybe it involved a TEPCO announcement that #4 is now operating in a horizontal position?
by Nancy 5/8/2011 3:04:29 AM
@Nancy heh...what can you do but laught right?
by radioguy 5/8/2011 3:04:35 AM
@radioguy gallows humor, a well known coping mechanism.
by Nancy 5/8/2011 3:04:54 AM
The complete lack of a SINGLE word about the Fuku smokeout last night is mind-boggling.
by radioguy 5/8/2011 3:05:08 AM
I have 2 tabs open. Both same Url, both say they are live but showing different images one really murky, other much clearer with light on building wall?????
by Cat 5/8/2011 3:06:03 AM
@radioguy I keep looking thinking I will get a news alert about it. Not a peep anywhere. The smoke out and whatever #1 is doing needs to show up on CNN and AlJazeera
by Nancy 5/8/2011 3:06:11 AM
@Nancy Oh right. It mentioned how the new configuration would make lifting all that water easier ort something... l it was like that anyway. Dire pronouncement, happytalk silver lining.
by radioguy 5/8/2011 3:06:26 AM
@Cat Try reloading both. You can end up with one playing old footage it already cached.
by Nancy 5/8/2011 3:06:39 AM
Yep, pathetic lack of coverage and then pieces like this: www.msnbc.msn.com stating radiation levels at 1 dropped, workers will re-enter and everything will be hunky dory in 6-9 months. Ahem.
by momof3 5/8/2011 3:07:14 AM
@momof3 Times of India just ran the same nonsense
by Nancy 5/8/2011 3:07:44 AM
@Nancy I have alerted my friends at RT and they are trying to figure out how to present the information. They welcome anyone who can speak authoritatively (which I can't) to talk with them or go on air. So if anyone want I can connect them. Meanwhile I know they are working on how to present what they are seeing.
by bo 5/8/2011 3:08:07 AM
yes maybe just a glitch they can freeze and still say live
by Cat 5/8/2011 3:08:16 AM
@bo What are we trying to present exactly?
by Jim 5/8/2011 3:09:06 AM
@Nancy-sorry I missed your link a few posts back. Looked away at the live feed for a bit and missed your Times of India story.
by momof3 5/8/2011 3:09:24 AM
@Jim they have noticed #4 leaning, and also all the smoke. They don't know what to make of it.
by bo 5/8/2011 3:09:42 AM
g'night all
by elainekirk 5/8/2011 3:10:01 AM
Really cruddy weather there today !
by wtm 5/8/2011 3:10:14 AM
@elainekirk good night!
by bo 5/8/2011 3:10:15 AM
@elainekirk night! sleep well!
by Angie 5/8/2011 3:10:22 AM
@stm still kosa in Japan, so a murky yellow atmosphere
by bo 5/8/2011 3:10:38 AM
Night Elaine.
by LM 5/8/2011 3:10:42 AM
I mean @wtm
by bo 5/8/2011 3:10:48 AM
MAY 4, 2011 - EPA IS ALL DONE WITH FUKUSHIMA - WILL SCALE DOWN MONITORING, REMOVE DEPLOYABLES AND RESUME ROUTINE, QUARTERLY TESTING - ACTIVISTS CONCERNED ABOUT LEVELS OF RADIOSTRONTIUMS IN MILK AND AIRBORNE PLUTONIUM-238
On the evening of May 3, the EPA posted on its Daily Data Summary page that the agency has unilaterally decided that due to the "consistent decrease in radiation levels across the country" it will begin transitioning to the normal "routine RadNet sampling and analysis process for precipitation, drinking water and milk," which is a protocol that calls for testing "milk and drinking water samples on a quarterly basis and precipitation samples as part of a monthly composite." The EPA is also considering removing from Hawaii, Alaska and other Pacific locations the "additional air monitors deployed in response to the Japan nuclear incident."
The EPA's startling move comes at a time when activists are criticizing the agency for not ramping up analysis of milk samples for radio-strontiums - strontium-89 was detected by the agency in early April in milk in Hawaii and strontium isotopes were detected in Moscow's air by a company named Radon in March - thus, there is a good chance that most food products in the U.S. contain trace amounts of radioactive strontium, but there is no data on this. www.idealist.ws
by JMV 5/8/2011 3:11:21 AM
Night Elaine, night folks
by Cat 5/8/2011 3:11:27 AM
@bo That's a tuffy. Need a bona fido experto i think. Can we absolutely rule out that it's not a physical, optical aberration?
by Jim 5/8/2011 3:11:55 AM
@elainekirk @Cat Night you two )
by Veenie 5/8/2011 3:11:58 AM
@Bo, what does kosa mean ?
by wtm 5/8/2011 3:12:08 AM
Night Elaine
by wtm 5/8/2011 3:12:19 AM
@Jim I know they are looking for structural engineers in Moscow to look at the images and comment. But it is Victory Day weekend there and no one is at work.