
That oxygen cylinder bothers me didnt we think early on that there may have been soldering etc equipment inside number 4 that may have contributed to the explosion , the shroud etc were being replaced were they not ?
by elainekirk 5/31/2011 7:58:58 PM

I know equipment was washed away but surely there was some kind of inventory they could have used and gone on the assumption that until shown otherwise equipment was still onsite because that blast could have caused much harm to the workers
by elainekirk 5/31/2011 8:03:30 PM

@nancy I havent seen her since our yesterday
by elainekirk 5/31/2011 8:32:35 PM

something is bugging me this asahi article speaks of an iaea draft report but I can find it nowhere
translate.google.comby elainekirk 5/31/2011 8:37:21 PM

if tepco have been told to test more then the two picked up were out of how many tested ? it could have been very few
by elainekirk 5/31/2011 8:38:40 PM

@rbeaner yes @nancy ah you are right ! it was confusing me
by elainekirk 5/31/2011 8:58:01 PM

sorry @bojack @all my use of fire meant entirely different to how it has been taken I meant it as 'alive' 'buzzing', as it is now, and not a 'challenging ' sorry I will remember that words have different meanings in future apologies
by elainekirk 5/31/2011 9:01:53 PM