
@deb here you can see the orange spray on #1. the same is on #2. img9.imageshack.us

@deb : the entire truth is: they wanted to make this, but they messed it up.

or this

@fitter ...[08-Jun-11 11:53:30 PM] SAD TO SAY BUT ANSWER IS MOST OF THE TIME A BIG YES. I CAN ONLY SPEAK FOR CONTAINER SHIPS AND WE TRY OUR BEST NOT TO DO BALLAST OPS IN A PORT. BUT SOMETIMES WE HAVE NO CHOICE BUT TO TAKE WATER ON ANYWAYS. AND THEN THESE TANKS HAVE TO BE GAUGED PERIODICALLY AS WELL. SOMETIMES EVEN ENTER TO INSPECT VALVES ,GAUGES ETC. ALL DEPENDS ON AGE OF VESSEL. NOW MOST BULKERS AND TANKERS MAYBE AN OLDER AGE FLEET. AS FOR TAKING WATER TO ANOTHER PORT. AMERICA HAS STRICT RULES ON KEEPING BALLAST RECORD LOG AND WE DO WHAT IS CALLED A COMPLETE DEEP SEA BALLAST WATER EXCHANGE TO EMPTY OUT ANY BACTERIA OR OTHER LIFE FORM WE MAYBE CARRYING FROM ANOTHER PORT. BY RELOADING DEEP SEA WATER WE CAN BE CLEAR TO ENTER AMERICAN PORT WITHOUT ANY HARRASSMENT SINCE ALL OUR WATER HAS BEEN EXCHANGED AND WE ARE ONLY CARRYING DEEP SEA WATER. PENDING THIS NOTION OFCOURSE THEN SHIPS CAN CONTAMINATE THE BIG DEEP BLUE OCEAN AS WELL. BUT CONTAMINATING CREW AND CARGO IS HARDER TO DETERMINE. DEPENDING OFCOURSE MANY FACTORS THAT YOUR GROUP HAVE TO CONSIDER. HOPE THIS HELPS. lh4.googleusercontent.com


I think is not a very radioactive water. But is Radioactive water :-(((((( img.allvoices.com

www.tepco.co.jp
The 4th floor of unit 4 fukushima daiichi