Japan Earthquake

Japan Earthquake | Page 1653

@ fitter,, interesting article,, did you notice the caveat at the bottom where you have to agree and click for the legal terms of use?.. that's a new one
by dean 6/16/2011 12:57:51 PM

@dean can we pin the nrc meeting if it works, and the article on the flordia NPP it seems as the SFP is not located inside the containment bld, I thought I had read this on other also.... but did not see what bld type they store in
by fitter 6/16/2011 12:59:17 PM

@dean Did not notice, I get there e-mails daily and magz... Does that make me "illeagl" will you post my bail?
by fitter 6/16/2011 1:00:15 PM

video.nrc.gov @all this is where you can download videos of meetings etc from the NRC
by dean 6/16/2011 1:00:58 PM

@Dean, there was a meeting on the 16th, nothing else listed until July for web casts.
by lillymunster 6/16/2011 1:01:04 PM

lol @ fitter.. I will start saving my change and get a legal fund going
by dean 6/16/2011 1:01:59 PM

@dean good we might ALL need I don't understand the paramiters of "copyright" ?????
by fitter 6/16/2011 1:03:05 PM

@all,, ,that video.nrc.gov link has some good topics on the left column that can be looked at
by dean 6/16/2011 1:04:52 PM

now I really have to go.. geeeeeeeeeesh.. be back later..
by dean 6/16/2011 1:10:51 PM

fitter was that comment on copyright a question to me.. I'm not really to up on the copyright laws and things.. I know we talked about it some time ago and I thought that's why we did the .org after the web page... and referenced sources etc..
by dean 6/16/2011 1:14:44 PM

@dean was looking at the fort calhoon NPP, if I remember correctly from when I was looking at Surry.... there were a complete different set of "contamination" rules for inside the "boundries" of the plant vs. "rule" that went outside the property lines.... it looks like the river is inside the property lines... what conserns would you think of "with the river being on that land and washing or contaminating (sure it would be very deluted) the downstream of the flood flow?
by fitter 6/16/2011 1:14:54 PM

@dean just gerneral, I don't know if I am alowed to link there reports or not? they have a lot of really good articles..
by fitter 6/16/2011 1:16:21 PM

good point @ fitter.. typically the utility is responsible for contamination inside the facility boundaries and have to report and alert local state and NRC of any contamination, plumes etc that goes outside the boundaries and, put in place monitoring etc to track the plume... in this case the outside has encroached the boundary ,,, could be confusing however, If I were NRC I would direct Calhoun to conduct a survey map to see what/if any contamination was on the dry ground as it stands now, and then establish a reporting route in the even of water coming to the dry ground so tracking could be set up down stream
by dean 6/16/2011 1:18:35 PM

"At the No. 2 reactor, a hydrogen explosion damaged the pressure suppression pool. According to analysis by the Nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency, there is a hole of about 300 square meters there." mdn.mainichi.jp
by bo 6/16/2011 1:18:43 PM

@dean the report I saw (digital air ways... breaks up) this moring said the water was up to some of the buildings... (think these were auxilerly buildings. not the reactor
by fitter 6/16/2011 1:20:39 PM

@lillymunster do you know what that converts to in US meserments
by fitter 6/16/2011 1:22:04 PM

@fitter For info - links are for the most part fine, so don't worry about posting them. As long as the source is clearly referenced, direct quotes will be ok too. If anyone is unhappy about a potential breach of copyright, first thing they ask is for the link to be removed, and that can easily be done here.
by es 6/16/2011 1:22:28 PM

@bo rough conversion would be 900sq feet, about the size of a small house.
by lillymunster 6/16/2011 1:22:35 PM

@lilly so it must be a typo or a misprint in the article, no?
by bo 6/16/2011 1:23:09 PM

shoot. .I just walked by.. 900 sq feet.. I want to see their calculations on that one, ,and they don't even know if it's real.. hmmmmmm
by dean 6/16/2011 1:23:51 PM

@lillymunster if that is the true conversion then it has to be a typo, or there are big problems
by fitter 6/16/2011 1:23:53 PM

@bo @fitter well think about the holes blasted in 1 3 and 4 from hydrogen, those holes are larger than 900 sq feet.
by lillymunster 6/16/2011 1:24:45 PM

unit #2 took a gut shot explosion,,, wow. .900 sq feet
by dean 6/16/2011 1:24:53 PM

I wish they had a way to scan underground and map that hole.
by lillymunster 6/16/2011 1:26:33 PM

www.animatedsoftware.com GOOD document for SFP boiloff and estimated sizes
by dean 6/16/2011 1:27:49 PM

The BWR pool surface area is assumed to be 105.7 square meters.
by dean 6/16/2011 1:28:23 PM

I thought maybe they were taking about the hole in the top of the SFP.. hmmmm... nope
by dean 6/16/2011 1:28:56 PM

Well it's all Ελληνικά to me, but I figured you all could make sense of it.
by bo 6/16/2011 1:31:00 PM

Monitoring the Monitors
Who's still tracking radiation from Fukushima? And who should we trust? www.slate.com
by bo 6/16/2011 1:39:40 PM

Check out this photo from inside 3. What is the big yellow thing in the upper right? Looks kind of like a piece of the yellow containment cap. www.houseoffoust.com
by lillymunster via Houseoffoust 6/16/2011 1:41:48 PM

2 - 5 SFP surface is about 121 square meters, 1 and 6 I don't know, according to the info at allthingsnuclear. allthingsnuclear.org
(It doesn't mean atn is right, but I thought I saw similar #s elsewhere)
by Markfm 6/16/2011 1:42:38 PM