
“The remarkable thing about this technology is how essentially safe if has been,” said nuclear energy expert John Ritch. “It does not produce emissions into the global atmosphere. And it has only on very rare occasions harmed anyone. In the meantime, we have had millions of fatalities from the extraction of fossil fuels from the surface of the earth and the health consequences of carbon emissions.”
rt.com
by bo 6/28/2011 5:16:24 AM

That interview with the World Nuclear Association lobbyist gets clipped, but you can see the push back, and read more at the link.
by bo 6/28/2011 5:17:48 AM

Bloomberg report on the TEPCO meeting
www.bloomberg.comby bo 6/28/2011 5:32:09 AM

So sad.
by bo 6/28/2011 7:47:25 AM

Anyone on here who is a techie?
by bo 6/28/2011 9:31:40 AM

@bo afraid my technical expertise is limited to the kettle - good morning
by elainekirk 6/28/2011 9:32:39 AM

@elaine good morning, or it will be good after some coffee.
by bo 6/28/2011 9:34:53 AM

I'm just wondering what I should expect to be a normal background gamma cpm reading here.
by bo 6/28/2011 9:35:30 AM

@bo this may be the case
by elainekirk 6/28/2011 9:35:43 AM

@Ralph Unger g'morning
by elainekirk 6/28/2011 9:36:00 AM

@Edano and they are just going to swing it over the unit?
by elainekirk 6/28/2011 9:41:13 AM

Tweetdom - RT @jakeadelstein: Let me translate the TEPCO apology: "We're so sorry that an unprecedented natural disaster ruined our fantastic nuclear reactor."
by elainekirk 6/28/2011 9:53:11 AM

Off to pedal home folks, see you later.
by bo 6/28/2011 9:54:38 AM

@bo safe travelling
by elainekirk 6/28/2011 9:59:20 AM

@Edano should we have a caption competition :)
by elainekirk 6/28/2011 10:00:51 AM

@Edano In architecture, a folly is a building constructed primarily for decoration, but either suggesting by its appearance some other purpose, or merely so extravagant that it transcends the normal range of garden ornaments or other class of building to which it belongs. In the original use of the word, these buildings had no other use
en.wikipedia.orgby elainekirk 6/28/2011 10:02:14 AM

@Edano nobody outside scrib is asking that question
by elainekirk 6/28/2011 10:06:15 AM

@Edano I think it is because the want to dismantle the outer containment due to it being structurally unsafe but that aint gonna help the goundwater situation
by elainekirk 6/28/2011 10:07:36 AM

@Edano it has an ground fault I believe
when I saw the flexi joints I started wondering but I dont think it will work maybe an octagon but not a square that
by elainekirk 6/28/2011 10:10:55 AM

The company said that a shareholder resolution calling for it to end to all use of nuclear power was voted down, but it did not disclose a vote tally.
online.wsj.comby elainekirk 6/28/2011 10:14:49 AM

@Edano oh I put a plan up there are vents and dinky wee pipes that will filter out the bad before it soars into the atmosphere
by elainekirk 6/28/2011 10:18:36 AM

@Edano I think at some stage they are going to have to dismantle the outer of #1 to prepre stands for those legs
by elainekirk 6/28/2011 10:27:00 AM