
As of 2001 there was an understanding that MOX assemblies at Kashiwazaki would be inspected periodically. No time frame for exactly how often is in the document
translate.google.comby lillymunster 6/29/2011 6:18:38 PM

@Panserbjorne9 Maybe TEPCO could be charged with animal cruelty? If they want to assert they are "their" dogs.
by lillymunster 6/29/2011 6:27:45 PM

@Edano there are some rather weak animal cruelty laws in Japan that relate to domestic pets. Now that you mention it, there is an interesting disconnect between the two. :-)
by lillymunster 6/29/2011 6:44:15 PM

funny, i released a different post from mod, but now it shows this old one. (?)
by Edano 6/29/2011 7:16:01 PM

All the newly installed software on both computers has rendered it impossible to screen capture youtube stills. GAH! If anyone has any ideas what to try let me know
by lillymunster 6/29/2011 7:47:46 PM

@Elaine Kirk tried a few and in multiple browsers, all seemed to strip out flash content..
by lillymunster 6/29/2011 8:06:40 PM

Back for rest of the day. yeahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
by dean 6/29/2011 8:08:43 PM

@dean LOL.
by lillymunster 6/29/2011 8:10:53 PM

checking into it now wrshpr,,,, I did notice on thing,, after fukushima and the big rush to determine the plume,,, all the many monitoring places hurried to get some detailed readings and there have been hundreds of those types of worries or wondering what the heck is going on... the area where I live in Idaho said.. oooooooooo wow Boise Idaho has the highest levels of the nation.. it's all so dependent on where you are, what instruments they use, if they use filters do they change them often, whats the background readings .etc..
by dean 6/29/2011 8:19:19 PM

A brief update on what I found on the MOX hunt. Fuku did store their MOX in the spent fuel pool up until they put it in the reactor. There was testing for americium and degradation. Some minor pitting/discolored areas and some small thin flakes of cladding were found on the pre-install inspections. There were also some minor irregularities found on the fuel pellets in the sample rods. The clear plastic cover seen in some of the pre-quake photos of the #3 spent fuel pool was supposed to keep contamination out of the mox assemblies. No explanation about how that would work. I found records of annual inspections of the 28 assemblies at Kashiwazaki up until 2005. Still looking for newer inspection records. Records up until 2005 were fairly easy to find. Not sure why newer records are not easily found but will keep digging for a while to make sure they are or are not there. So far Kashiwazaki's MOX post 2005 is still a mystery.
by lillymunster 6/29/2011 8:27:13 PM

@wrshpr,, I compared data from that link for 5 major cities and they varied all over the place. the largest spike of those 5 was the one on 6-1 and about 6-7 inwhich it spiked from a background of about 75 to 650. I don't have an immediate explanation for it but wonder if you could email the data people and ask why the spikes there but not such extreme spikes in the neighboring areas? ..
by dean 6/29/2011 8:30:36 PM

good find lilly, putting good elements in the SFP is sure a waste of space and a waste because they have to then keep pristine chemistry controls going.. I also wonder if they have testing or limits for the OXIDE LAYER on the fuel before it goes in ...
by dean 6/29/2011 8:31:44 PM

@lilly.. was that debris found on the new MOX fuel elements.. flakes of cladding etc...
by dean 6/29/2011 8:36:07 PM