
@ariadne i did indeed get eaten staying undrcover tomoro ...barring wild horses that is
by elainekirk 7/27/2011 11:22:51 PM

@ariadne thank you
by elainekirk 7/27/2011 11:26:59 PM

@ariadne brilliant well done!!
by elainekirk 7/27/2011 11:31:17 PM

@ariadne this is true just been sending your link to rockhopper and others
by elainekirk 7/27/2011 11:37:02 PM

news24.jpAgriculture Ministry decided not to ask for voluntary recall of leaf mulch, because 'NO IMMEDIATE health concerns.' (JP)
by elainekirk 7/27/2011 11:54:16 PM

Back for a bit, in body, not sure if I am here mentally. :-)
by lillymunster 7/27/2011 11:54:56 PM

@ariadne thanks for the info you dug up!
by lillymunster 7/27/2011 11:55:47 PM

back
by dean 7/28/2011 12:00:23 AM

PTNL taking maiden voyage in new ship to take vitrified nuclear waste back to Japan.
www.pntl.co.uk by lillymunster 7/28/2011 12:18:17 AM

@lillymunster that is just so ... I dunno I don't want it on our shores but to send it back at this time ....
by elainekirk 7/28/2011 12:51:56 AM

@elainekirk I think what is being sent back is vitrified. Where they are going to put it? I thought they didn't have a storage facility yet.
by lillymunster 7/28/2011 12:53:49 AM

@lillymunster knowing the London administration they will bethinking it will show the world that it is business as usual in Japan
by elainekirk 7/28/2011 12:58:11 AM

@elainekirk likely part of this PR push this week that nuclear is ticking along just fine. Lots of purposeful pieces like that in the news trying to make people think everything is spiffy in the nuclear industry. This could also have something to do with investors and stock prices.
by lillymunster 7/28/2011 1:01:44 AM

@lillymunster oh to be sure it has!!
by elainekirk 7/28/2011 1:04:48 AM

Is it me or does this Dose Limit Chart from ICRP published on the NRC website give different levels to those being touted as safe in Japan
DOSE LIMIT COMPARISON CHART
www.nrc.govby elainekirk 7/28/2011 1:14:46 AM

USA | WALL STREET JOURNAL | 27 July 2011
PARIS (Dow Jones)–French state-controlled nuclear engineering firm Areva SA (AREVA.FR) Wednesday reported a large drop in quarterly earnings and warned that it is still too soon to assess the full consequences of the Fukushima nuclear disaster on its long-term financial outlook.
In the first half of 2011, Areva’s net profit stood at EUR351 million, down from the EUR843 million a year earlier. Operating income excluding special items fell to EUR62 million in the period from EUR213 million a year earlier.
But Areva’s earnings statement was even more noteworthy as an articulation of the new uncertainty that shadows the nuclear business following Fukushima. Areva has touted its 3rd generation EPR reactor as the world’s safest nuclear source.
In its most extensive comments yet on the consequences of Fukushima on its business, Areva warned the full long-term impacts “remain extremely difficult to assess at this time.” It noted that leading international organizations also had “not published post-Fukushima forecasts.”
The shift could “concern all operations in the nuclear cycle and will be included in the strategic plan to be prepared by the end of the second half of the year,” the group’s new Chief Executive Luc Oursel said in a statement.
fukushimanewsresearch.wordpress.comby elainekirk 7/28/2011 1:33:02 AM

back.. ready for action
by dean 7/28/2011 1:39:20 AM

Citizen Radiation Monitoring in Japan page!
www.crms-jpn.com It is certainly a start! Veggie chart
www.crms-jpn.comby lillymunster 7/28/2011 1:43:46 AM

154 US service members have internal radiation doses
enenews.comby lillymunster 7/28/2011 1:45:35 AM

everything is a big secret when it comes to radiation it's just sad
by dean 7/28/2011 1:50:09 AM

@dean they trotted out the xray is the same as ________ thing. I little concerning that the military didn't seem to have a protocol to invoke related to radiation safety.
by lillymunster 7/28/2011 1:54:14 AM

@dean well for areva to takee a 60% knock with all the trade they have had from tepco means conttracts are being cancelled somewhere
by elainekirk 7/28/2011 1:55:38 AM

@lillymunster did you see ariadnes link re the 'same as'
by elainekirk 7/28/2011 1:56:34 AM

@elainekirk I grabbed the couple of links she posted. Was this something else?
by lillymunster 7/28/2011 2:01:22 AM

true @ lilly,,, mum's the word
by dean 7/28/2011 2:05:41 AM

@elaine.. Areva is like the other conglomerates, actually monopolists who is suffering world wide due to fukushima
by dean 7/28/2011 2:06:36 AM

that is really spelled out for Areva who has purchased solar thermal power... they are shifting gears to hedge
by dean 7/28/2011 2:11:00 AM

@dean yes ! dean what do you think to the icrp dose charts on the nrc site they say they are using v1 in preference to v2 is v2 a fuku special maybe ?
www.nrc.govby elainekirk 7/28/2011 2:11:07 AM

not sure on that one @ elaine, every time I see them tweek those limits I think of how much they have failed in the limits and failed in communicating with the people.
by dean 7/28/2011 2:15:50 AM

what japan should have done is focus any increases at the reactor building and leave all others where they were...
by dean 7/28/2011 2:17:29 AM

@dean very true
by elainekirk 7/28/2011 2:20:29 AM

they are trying to bring the plants to some form of safety shutdown and then deal with the recovery which will result in higher doses to workers... and it's all made worse by the fact that the workers are more worried about being paid and their jobs hinge around how much dose they take in ... they need the money.. imagine them scrambling in and out of those facillities doing the recovery as fast as physically possible.. probably thinking.. "if we just leave our dosimeters just in side the door and do our work then pick the dosimeters up on the way out" we will make more money
by dean 7/28/2011 2:20:33 AM

if they hit the limits set ,, they are sent home with no pay to become unemployable for months
by dean 7/28/2011 2:23:03 AM

@dean this is true have you read the worker tweets I posted earlier
by elainekirk 7/28/2011 2:24:32 AM

yes elaine.. it's so sad
by dean 7/28/2011 2:24:47 AM

@dean mmm why are the ircp restricting theiir annual recs ? now that is strange
www.nrc.govby elainekirk 7/28/2011 2:27:46 AM

their charitable aims on their charity com reg say
WHAT WE DO: ICRP ISSUES RECOMMENDATIONS AND GUIDANCE ON PROTECTION AGAINST HARMFUL EFFECTS OF IONISING RADIATION IN OUR JOURNAL, THE ANNALS OF THE ICRP.
WHY: TO CONTRIBUTE TO AN APPROPRIATE LEVEL OF PROTECTION FOR PEOPLE AND THE ENVIRONMENT, WITHOUT UNDULY LIMITING DESIRABLE ACTIVITIES.
FOR WHOM: ORGANISATIONS, REGULATORS, INDIVIDUALS.
HOW: WE DRAFT REPORTS AND MEET TO REVIEW AND APPROVE THEM
www.charity-commission.gov.ukthis charity is looking ifier by the minute they cannot say their aim is to inform and then restrict the info by putting a price on its head
by elainekirk 7/28/2011 2:31:12 AM

Quince in reactor 3 video
ex-skf.blogspot.comby lillymunster 7/28/2011 3:35:03 AM