ScribbleLive

another busby skeptic nextbigfuture.com Either Busby's spot on, or he's a kook/disinformation agent, and I'm getting the feeling it's the latter.

@Edano I just ran across that, see my top 10. Cesium is much worse than iodine, it will kill you if you come across enough of it. But I just don't see any evidence that a contaminated playground, hamburger, tea or livining an an area at the Chernobyl level of contamination killed anybody or even caused cancer due to cesium exposure which seems to be 99% of the problem right now that's got everybody scared to death.

Busby: Hundreds of millions of deaths due to cesium: So who is right? Busby or the evidence that low-level radiation didn't kill anybody in Chernobyl or Fukushima? www.examiner.com
Fukushima nuclear power plant radiation recordings of external gamma radiation have been so high this week, they went off scale said veteran nuclear expert Arnie Gunderson on Thursday after the famous physicist, Dr. Chris Busby told the Japanese people this week that radioactive air contamination there is now 300 times that of Chernobyl and 1000 times the atomic bomb peak in 1963, inferring that hundreds of millions of people are now dying from Fukushima radiation, including people in the United States Experts: Fukushima 'off-scale' lethal radiation level infers millions dying

@Edano Seems that the only thing that sticks around long enough to cause a cancer is going to be cesium. Iodine only causes thyroid cancer. All you have to do is show tons of cancer deaths, and it's going to be from the cesium, isn't that the main thing that's causing most of the radiation measuremens outside the plant?

@Peter Busby is snake oil vendor. Exactly my point, Moret is worse. Nobody else is predicting millions of deaths, so claims like this need to be shot down.

Some info from the September report of NISA to IAEA:
"For Unit 1, as of August 31, water injection has been carried out with the amount of water about 3.6m3/h, which exceeds the amount of water injection equivalent to decay heat.
Temperature of the bottom of the RPV … stayed under 100°C, and the reactor has been …cooled sufficiently by means of a reactor water injection system (Figure II-2-28).
In Unit 1, on April 7, the injection of nitrogen into the PCV was started (Figure II-2-29), and it is still ongoing as of August 31.
Furthermore, following the calibration of the water level gauge conducted in May, the reference leg side of the reactor water level gauge (fuel range A system) has been filled with water. A temporary pressure gauge was installed, and it has started monitoring the reactor water level as well as reactor pressure from reading pressure values and hydraulic head. Monitoring has been continuously carried out to date (Figure II-2-30).
For Unit 2, as of August 31, water injection has been carried out with the amount of water about 3.8m3/h which exceeds … Temperature of the bottom of the RPV … stayed under 130°C, and the reactor has been …cooled sufficiently by reactor water injection system (Figure II-2-31).
In Unit 2, on June 28, the injection of nitrogen into the PCV was started (Figure II-2-32), and it is still ongoing as of August 31.
Furthermore, with regard to the measures carried out after June, a temporary pressure gauge was installed as the same configuration of Unit 1 on June 22. It was estimated that reactor water level was - 5m or less from the TAF, the same estimation as that of Unit 1, but TEPCO recognizes that it is not possible to correctly measure it at this point."