
fission is not a reaction ....
by Edano 11/3/2011 7:29:34 PM

@Pedro Jesus you cannot slow down fission by boronic acid. this is only useful to stop a chain reaction.
by Edano 11/3/2011 7:33:50 PM

"On Wednesday, Junichi Matsumoto, a Tokyo Electric spokesman, acknowledged episodes of fission, saying at a news conference: “There is a possibility that certain conditions came together temporarily that were conducive to re-criticality,” and that the measurements indicated a burst that occurred at a slightly higher rate than prior cases."
www.nytimes.comby Edano 11/3/2011 7:36:09 PM

@Pedro Jesus they need some sort of terminology agreement with cheat sheet. I saw the same thing only worse in the US when they had the ammonia leak at San Onofre. Every media outlet was calling it a different emergency classification. None of them seemed to have a clue what they were talking about.
by lillymunster 11/3/2011 7:57:20 PM

the same confusion happens always with the words "containment" and "vessel". we are never sure what they mean.
by Edano 11/3/2011 7:59:36 PM

@Pedro Jesus that is their different story today, they have clearly changed their story over time on this.
by lillymunster 11/3/2011 8:07:58 PM

back for a bit.. hello to all
by dean 11/3/2011 8:08:46 PM

"The operator of the Fukushima nuclear power plant has retracted an earlier assessment that a continuous nuclear reaction, or a criticality, could have taken place in the damaged Number 2 reactor."
www3.nhk.or.jpby Edano 11/3/2011 8:12:49 PM

@dean hi deany.
by Edano 11/3/2011 8:13:54 PM

@Edano..greetings... TEPCO doesn't know
by dean 11/3/2011 8:14:40 PM

by Edano 11/3/2011 8:26:03 PM

Quote of the day: "TEPCO doesn't know" :-)
by lillymunster 11/3/2011 8:29:37 PM

Dutch to raise green energy subsidies in 2012: AMSTERDAM (Reuters) - The Dutch ministry for economic affairs sai...
bit.lyby lillymunster 11/3/2011 8:40:32 PM

@Peter so they build a nuke plant on a fault line then punish customers for their failures?
by lillymunster 11/3/2011 9:06:28 PM

@amber m Hi Amber, could you be a bit more specific? We could probably point you to some sources with some additional details.
by lillymunster 11/3/2011 9:07:04 PM

Stronium 90 in Tokyo air in March
fukushima-diary.comby lillymunster 11/3/2011 9:51:13 PM

Higher amounts of cesium in Fish. I think these are higher than previous testing I have seen.
fukushima-diary.comby lillymunster 11/3/2011 9:54:12 PM

Oct government results for fish show little or nothing in fish in Iwaki
www.mhlw.go.jpby lillymunster 11/3/2011 10:02:05 PM

bump
by lillymunster 11/4/2011 12:04:04 AM

70 percent in Japan want end to nuclear powerAn NHK poll shows that nearly 70 percent of Japanese people want to reduce or abolish nuclear power in the future.
NHK polled about 2,600 randomly selected adults nationwide over 3 days through October 28th.
1,775 people responded.
24 percent of respondents said all nuclear power plants should be shut down and 42 percent said the number should be reduced.
23 percent said the existing facilities should be maintained and 2 percent said they want more nuclear plants.
49 percent of respondents said they are very afraid of another nuclear accident and 37 percent are worried to a certain extent.
When asked if nuclear power generation will become safe in the future, 46 percent said yes and 48 percent said no.
Friday, November 04, 2011 06:53 +0900 (JST)
www3.nhk.or.jp by Edano 11/4/2011 12:05:15 AM

@Edano interesting
by elainekirk 11/4/2011 12:08:22 AM

Shareholders to seek money from TEPCO managersTokyo Electric Power Company shareholders are poised to launch court procedures and demand that the utility's current and former management return more than 14 billion dollars to the firm.
About 30 shareholders plan to file a class-action lawsuit against roughly 60 executives who worked at TEPCO over the past 2 decades.
The investors say they will take legal action if the company refuses to demand that the executives return the large sum of money.
Observers say that if the shareholders go to court, the damages they would seek would be a record high in Japan's judicial history.
The shareholders claim that TEPCO executives failed to take adequate safety measures to protect the plant from an earthquake and tsunami waves.
One investor said that the executives repeatedly emphasized the safety of nuclear plants. However, the accident has caused irreparable damage.
The group claims that at shareholders' meetings the executives never heeded the safety concerns discussed involving nuclear power generation.
TEPCO says it can't comment on the lawsuit until it knows more details.
Friday, November 04, 2011 04:56 +0900 (JST)
www3.nhk.or.jp by Edano 11/4/2011 12:09:59 AM

@you personal liability ...... good idea !
by Edano 11/4/2011 12:12:09 AM

that lawsuit is full of awesome! :-)
by lillymunster 11/4/2011 12:13:42 AM

International Business Times blasts TEPCO and GoJ about the pacific contamination and how it will impact seafood. This is the first real mainstream media concern about seafood safety I have seen and it is in the business sector.
community.nasdaq.comby lillymunster 11/4/2011 12:50:26 AM