
@lilly good nite!
by bo 2/3/2012 4:09:08 AM

I'm out too all, see you all soon.
by bo 2/3/2012 4:18:33 AM

bump
by Mid Valley 2/3/2012 6:58:58 AM

Safecast have a brand new Global map
blog.safecast.orgby elainekirk 2/3/2012 10:56:13 AM

@Pedro Jesus morning Pedro :)
by elainekirk 2/3/2012 11:35:37 AM

@UKVal they have a problem
by elainekirk 2/3/2012 11:37:34 AM

@UKVal if happy says it then I believe him over tepco, happy is the most conservative tweeter from fuku
by elainekirk 2/3/2012 11:48:34 AM

@UKVal yeah they should have concentrated more effort on emptying that pool somehow . I never quite understood the rush to cover #1 over dealing with 3 & 4 which seemed far more vulnerable
by elainekirk 2/3/2012 12:05:33 PM

@UKVal as far as I know unit 1 wasn't going to be decommissioned. IIRC there was some vague talk of running MOX in it at some point.
by lillymunster 2/3/2012 12:50:11 PM

@UKVal where are the numbers on the unused fuel in the sfp's I can find it now but those numbers are very significant especially the ones at 3.
Looking at Fukushima Diary's story the critical issue is the exact number of assemblies and he doesn't seem to translate that. The fuel in the pool for 10 years was loaded all or in part in 2010 September and that was well publicized. What Smoss and I have been trying to find is the exact number of assemblies or other evidence showing there were some left over assemblies in the fuel pool. All from the 1999 shipment to Fuku were loaded in the core. The left over unused assemblies from Kashiwazaki we worry were sent over to Fuku for use after they found they could not use them at Kashiwazaki
by lillymunster 2/3/2012 12:52:33 PM

@UKVal thanks, sorting through the doc from Fukudiary with a translator right now looking for numbers
by lillymunster 2/3/2012 12:59:53 PM

From the translated MOX document:
MOX fuel has a new feature of its characteristics change over time, by changes in fuel composition, such as decay of plutonium to americium, and changes in the expected effect of lowering the reactivity and reactivity coefficients of variation of physical properties and fuel pellets be.
I don't know if this impacts the ability to control them?
by lillymunster 2/3/2012 1:01:56 PM

@UKVal oh yes. Read it early on in our MOX research. It is absolutely worrisome in context of unit 3. I think some of his research into MOX behavior has been overlooked as implication in 3's meltdown, explosion and higher radiation.
by lillymunster 2/3/2012 1:03:48 PM

@Pedro Jesus ooh thanks. That may be useful in archiving news articles and documents. Right now I have a multi step process that is a bit too time consuming.
by lillymunster 2/3/2012 1:05:17 PM

@UKVal The info in his paper that talks about mox fuel getting hot spots, the ability for the fuel to vaporize at a low temperature and the known fact that the cladding had signs of degedation before it was installed... The mox installed also was done with the process criticized as being insuffcient to mix the fuel causing the hot spots
by lillymunster 2/3/2012 1:10:36 PM

@Pedro Jesus will do. If there is a way to then put it as a permanent public record online I think we have a winner.
by lillymunster 2/3/2012 1:11:20 PM