
by elainekirk 5/15/2011 6:01:46 PM

@marie have they given any temps for common pool?
by elainekirk 5/15/2011 7:17:52 PM

@mark thanks have you noticed any changes?
by elainekirk 5/15/2011 7:38:32 PM

@mark @marie does the comparisson with a feb reading mean it is the first time they have tested since the quake?
by elainekirk 5/15/2011 7:46:49 PM

Morning everyone...........
by Angie 5/15/2011 8:12:33 PM

@angie g'morning :) @rbeaner yes I saw that I havent seen any update yet
by elainekirk 5/15/2011 8:14:53 PM

There shouldnt be saltwater in there unless there was a problem and they needed to put it there right?? sorry only just woke up.........
by Angie 5/15/2011 8:17:07 PM

it has happened before
en.wikipedia.org by elainekirk edited by Angie 5/15/2011 8:18:23 PM

@Marie did no government agency charged who may be impotent generallly not think to use the power they have to demand data that would be needed to assess risk to citizens think to ask tepco for the data ??
by elainekirk 5/15/2011 8:36:46 PM

Since Japan’s reprocessing plant does not have the capacity to reprocess spent fuel at the samerate at which it is discharged from Japan’s power reactors, of central dry-storage capacity for fivethousand tons8 of spent fuel is being built in Mutsu near the Rokkasho reprocessing plant. In1993, five hundred tons of interim dry-cask storage capacity was authorized to be built at theFukushima I reactor site. In both cases, however, commitments were received by the localauthorities that the spent fuel would be reprocessed in a second reprocessing plant if and whenone is built. in the expectation that the fuel would be shipped to the second reprocessing.9 Giventhe delay in building the second reprocessing plant, which was originally scheduled to operationin 2010, however, and delays in full-scale operation of Rokkasho, it is likely that interim storagecapacity will be required.
by elainekirk 5/15/2011 8:37:05 PM

18yrs is a hell of a long 'temporary'!!
by elainekirk 5/15/2011 8:38:32 PM