Japan Earthquake | Page 1267

  • @Dean DOE-STD-1136-2004 does that mean it's a 2004 standard, cause I was gonre from it in 2001, We had HiRad, Inadvertant criticality monitors, but I don't remember any "take with you activated material, except the TLD's
    by RBeaner 5/19/2011 5:07:27 PM

  • @Edano I don't think the tsunami broke that. The digital globe pic of right before 3 blew up could give a better answer
    by Nancy 5/19/2011 5:08:26 PM

  • we had ours for a long time, since they were installed newer dosimetry was put in place.. I still think they have the fixed kind there.. maybe not at NRC's
    by Dean 5/19/2011 5:09:28 PM

  • @Dean When we handled fuel, we had CRM's( continuos radiation monitors), but the were electronic and only for hirad levels, not n activation. the only thing I am familiar with for n activation is the indium in the TLD (Thermo-Lumenescent Dosimeter), which is the official record of external exposure for nuclear workers, for all:)
    by RBeaner 5/19/2011 5:13:29 PM

  • @Edano I think that piping (duicting was destroyed by explosion, I don't think tsunami did it...I could be wrong
    by RBeaner 5/19/2011 5:15:15 PM

  • Dean, hi. In your chart pinned above the numbers are minutes, correct??
    by billmcd 5/19/2011 5:15:27 PM

  • @RBeaner about the same here,,, CAM's, ,RAM's, TLD's, hand helds etc.
    by Dean 5/19/2011 5:15:31 PM

  • minutes yes billmcd
    by Dean 5/19/2011 5:15:42 PM

  • @Edano We could also check if the tsunami waves could have reached that conduct. It seems too high to me for the waves to have disrupted it and it is twisted downwards suggest something else might have caused the damage. Worth checking out with older pictures.
    by Pedro Jesus 5/19/2011 5:17:32 PM

  • (suggesting)
    by Pedro Jesus 5/19/2011 5:17:57 PM

  • www.digitalglobe.com connection intact after tsunami on 12 march

    by Edano via Digitalglobe 5/19/2011 5:18:31 PM

  • @Pedro Jesus @Edano I think we are agreeing on this. Obstruction downstream (specifically HEPA filters) for the combined unit discharge, could allow backup into another building. they were attempting to actively vent r3 and r4 had no ventilation at all. I tell you if steam (from Reactor Building 3) hits the HEPA, very little air is getting through.
    by RBeaner 5/19/2011 5:20:00 PM

  • i think tepco lies always .... ;)
    by Edano 5/19/2011 5:25:01 PM

  • The Truth Elastic Power COmpany
    by radioguy 5/19/2011 5:27:04 PM

  • @Edano TEPCO lies even when the truth would serve them better, yea possible. Maybe just take the sunny side of the truth. What particular part of the discussion do you take umbrage with.
    by RBeaner 5/19/2011 5:27:55 PM

  • In order to answer the question whether H2 backflow to #4 through venting pipe from #3 was possible, we have to find a photo of the stack right after the #3 explosion. I assumed that that explosion already destroyed the connection to #4. As to my earlier question about that pipe running up the reactor building, we saw some clouds that might have been from venting during the arrival of the tsunami waves the other day (can't find the vid anymore). The clouds were produced at the roof line just about where this pipe ends. Perhaps the clouds emanated from such pipe.
    by Peter Melzer 5/19/2011 5:33:15 PM

  • @RBeaner TEPCO allegedly did not have filters on the vents. Probably added to their reluctance to vent.
    by Nancy 5/19/2011 5:33:21 PM

  • Morning.... High radiation in D/W for #1 & 3, and pressures rising in #3 S/C....looks like corium is dripping down lower ?
    by wtm 5/19/2011 5:33:44 PM

  • @Dean, I wondered about such rad monitors, too. If a detector a mile away tripped an alarm during the minutes after the quake, the ones in the reactor buildings and at the stacks must have gone crazy. Yet, tepco notes no releases. Something is amiss here!
    by Peter Melzer 5/19/2011 5:37:10 PM

  • @Nancy They had to have filtration somewhere in line with the vents. I don't know where, but any exhaust from those Radiological Work Areas (the entire building) had to be filtered and the stack monitored. It could have been inside each building, but I would bet that where there was a combined stack, there was combined filtration.
    by RBeaner 5/19/2011 5:37:14 PM

  • @Peter Melzer How could we back track that other vent (the one on the side of the building)? I don't remember seeing anything about it in photos or old documents from TEPCO. It seems to go down to the level of the accessory building. Does anyone have an idea where in the buildings the generators are? I would assume though that a generator stack would look more like the metal stack you see on generators outside buildings where they look almost like semi=truck exhaust stacks....
    by Nancy 5/19/2011 5:37:40 PM

  • @Nancy The building pictured is intact on 3/27 which means it is 2, 5 or 6, right?
    by RBeaner 5/19/2011 5:38:56 PM

  • @RBeaner I will see if I can back track the news article, it was within the last 2 days. I thought it was an insane proposition also. According to the news article the lack of filtration on the venting system was because the entire thing was completely optional and not bound by any laws.
    by Nancy 5/19/2011 5:39:07 PM

  • @nancy werent generators in basements I thought?
    by elainekirk 5/19/2011 5:39:26 PM

  • @RBeaner hmm what image are you referring to?
    by Nancy 5/19/2011 5:39:33 PM

  • @Nancy< i just vividly recall the debate about the rusty brown colored smoke emanating from the pipe leading to the stack from #3. That turned out to be a crane boom, when we found higher res pics. On those pics. the connection to #4 was broken.
    by Peter Melzer 5/19/2011 5:39:45 PM

  • @elainekirk yes they were in lower levels but I was unsure of their general location within those basement? Was it in the turbine building, reactor building? If in reactor was it near the turbine building or possibly on the other side in one of those steel beige buildings?
    by Nancy 5/19/2011 5:40:29 PM

  • @Peter Melzer yes. now I don't remember if that was pre or post explosion of 3.
    by Nancy 5/19/2011 5:41:02 PM

  • @Nancy In the US, any area where radiological work is performed, even minor low level stuff is done, must be at (very) slight negative pressure and go through a filtered and monitored stack (exhaust)
    by RBeaner 5/19/2011 5:41:03 PM

  • @Nancy - the generators are run off steam turbines, which have no need for and exhaust stack like semi-trucks use... the generators were in a its own building.
    by Lethbridgean 5/19/2011 5:41:11 PM

  • @Dean. I thought your spreadsheet was in hours. Is it hours or minutes?
    by Scilla 5/19/2011 5:41:21 PM

  • @RBeaner yes, that is why I did a double take on that article.
    by Nancy 5/19/2011 5:41:29 PM

  • @Nancy @Lethbridgean @Markfm @Edano The origional question was ""@Nancy, some other bit of info stuck in my mind: at 2:15, an open pipe on the side of what might be building of #2 is shown in this vid : www.youtube.com . Any idea what it is for? Where is fitter? Would he know?
    by Peter Melzer at 11:40 AM www.youtube.com I suggest it is shared R#3 + R#4 vent duct pipe
    by you
    by RBeaner 5/19/2011 5:41:44 PM

  • @Lethbridgean so they would need to be on the turbine side and in some configuration near the turbines. So basement of turbine building or in between turbine and reactor?
    by Nancy 5/19/2011 5:42:15 PM

  • @Peter Melzer first indication should NEVER be to distrust your indications, you respond and worry about false alarms later, However, today I believe this remote rad reading/alarm was incorrect, unless it gets backed up by closer data. Funny things happen when systems get hit by earthquakes and then tsunamis. If there is no other supporting data, I think we will find that this alarm 1.5 miles away was bogus.
    by RBeaner 5/19/2011 5:45:16 PM

  • Check out the linked to large version of the Digital Globe image after 3 blew up before 4 did. The pipe appears severed. www.digitalglobe.com
    and this one, post tsunami and pre- 3 blowing up. www.digitalglobe.com

    by Nancy via Digitalglobe 5/19/2011 5:49:57 PM

  • Check out the linked to large version of the Digital Globe image after 3 blew up before 4 did. The pipe appears severed. www.digitalglobe.com
    and this one, post tsunami and pre- 3 blowing up. www.digitalglobe.com

    by Nancy via Digitalglobe 5/19/2011 5:49:57 PM

  • @Nancy - Not sure I understand that question. What is the "they". The "exhaust" of a steam turbine runs by pipe into a condenser to phase change the remaining steam back into water then that water goes by pipe to the heat exchanger to get phase changed back into steam. Its a closed loop system. Are you talking about the backup diesel generators?
    by Lethbridgean 5/19/2011 5:50:27 PM

  • Color-corrected webcam image shows strange glow near Fukushima reactors (PHOTOS)
    May 19th, 2011 at 01:43 PM enenews.com
    by Majj 5/19/2011 5:51:10 PM

  • @Lethbridgean I am talking about the diesel generators, not the back up steam loop. We are trying to determine what the round pipe that runs up the side of the building is. That seemed to have crossed conversations about the vent stack system. Sort of 2 different conversations.
    by Nancy 5/19/2011 5:52:21 PM

  • As far as the vent exhaust that runs up the stack towers. It appears intact after the tsunami but not after 2 blew up. If hydrogen leaked to 4 it would have to have done so before the blast or through other building connections. Elaine found something that could have been a connecting hall between the two.
    by Nancy 5/19/2011 5:53:28 PM

  • This is Tepco's media images/video page (where the media get's all their Tepco release images from). The newest images up the top show the plant getting hit by the tsunami. translate.google.com
    by Majj 5/19/2011 5:57:43 PM

  • I am still looking for the news article that mentioned the venting system not having filters. I found a reference to it to a letter to the editor but can't find my link. Will keep trying to track it down to determine if it is true or not.
    by Nancy 5/19/2011 6:13:43 PM

  • The pics @majj has posted give an idea of the depth of the flooding - from the vertical car I'd guess appr. 4 meters.
    by hudebnik 5/19/2011 6:17:46 PM

  • @Edano I'm supposing that since there are 4 vent stack for 6 plant, the hookup goes 1 has its own, 2 has its own 3+4 connect and 5+6 connect to each other
    by RBeaner 5/19/2011 6:36:08 PM

Japan Earthquake | Page 1267

Who's Blogging
  • hudebnikhudebnik
  • albleealblee
  • UKValUKVal
  • Oliver (ScribbleLive)Oliver (ScribbleLive)
  • Jonathan KeeblerJonathan Keebler
  • kaykodhkaykodh
  • PKelleyPKelley
  • MarkfmMarkfm
  • AngieAngie
  • DebDeb
  • Mid ValleyMid Valley
  • Pedro Jesus
  • Matt (ScribbleLive)Matt (ScribbleLive)
  • George GibbGeorge Gibb
  • elainekirkelainekirk
  • lillymunsterlillymunster
  • deandean
  • bobo
  • EdanoEdano
  • IanGoddardIanGoddard