Japan Earthquake | Page 1489


  • translate.google.com translation of worker exposure doc
    by elainekirk 6/3/2011 4:02:43 PM

  • @Peter Melzer : but i have no idea towards your questions. it would be favourable to have constant and quantitative readings of these isotopes, but we only have them being mentioned.
    by Edano 6/3/2011 4:05:20 PM

  • 地震発生日時: 2011/06/04 01:00:13 震源地: 福島県沖 震源の深さ: 10km マグニチュード: M6 最大震度: 震度4
    Chinese to English translation
    Earthquake 発 birthday: 2011/06/04 01:00:13 Source Location: Fukushima Prefecture, deep red source の さ: 10km グ マ ニ ュ ー ド チ: M6 largest quake: quake 4
    by Veenie 6/3/2011 4:06:50 PM

  • @Peter Melzer have only seen your very first post... so bear with me.... yes those are excelent, as the clean up on the columbina river ???? was not sucseful, ilrelavent of the cost... but explains in detail the system tried that DID NOT work... Most important factor is I AM NOT LOOKING at cost, as much as do able.... to build a tank (ficticious numbers) say I tell the client will take 2000 manhours.. thats 250 days with 4 men working on it that 62.5 days to build.... you might be able to increase the labor to 10 men and do it in 25 days, but you can't just divide 250 days by 20 men and say you can build in 12.5 days..... and its a very hard concept for them,,,, part b can not go before part a etc... so we want to look more at manhours/avaliblity of materials, delivery vs cost.... cost is last .. I need to shut my computor off so I can get some work done .... I'll be back to nite...
    by fitter 6/3/2011 4:11:30 PM

  • @all
    OK, here's the BRAWN article that chart is from: pissinontheroses.blogspot.com
    and here's one other doing fallout analysis: pissinontheroses.blogspot.com
    Could we take a look at this and see if the analysis is valid?
    by radioguy 6/3/2011 4:16:05 PM

  • www.tepco.co.jp results from sediment 3km from shore

    by elainekirk 6/3/2011 4:18:24 PM

  • @fitter , I understand now. You made an excellent point, because at a certain load of people they all get into each others way. But, then we must factor in the radiation. You need more people to achieve the same and the job will take more time to complete. The best solution would be to preassemble the equipment in modules offsite as much as possible, so that they just need to be connected on location.
    by Peter Melzer 6/3/2011 4:21:06 PM

  • 5.6 EQ really close to plant now up on USGS. quakes.globalincidentmap.com
    by LM 6/3/2011 4:21:50 PM

  • @Peter Melzer And you have major rad limit-burn problems with your most valuable on-site workers.
    by radioguy 6/3/2011 4:22:37 PM

  • @fitter Indeed, cost and national boundaries should be no object when you're talking about saving your planet, but we've never seen it work out that way before.
    by radioguy 6/3/2011 4:24:32 PM

  • @radioguy this is what gets me with the tankers - who is going to man them and where are they going to be. It is horrendous to think people will be bringing new life into the world in order that they can as adults sacrifice themselves to solving the mess we made
    by elainekirk 6/3/2011 4:25:41 PM

  • @Peter Melzer @Edano The barium and lanthanum figures in the water under the reactors is at www.tepco.co.jp Strontium releases should be approximately the same amount as Ba-140. This is running at about 30% of Cesium-137. It indicates considerable corium-concrete interactions in #2 and #3. The Cobalt-60 under reactor #3 (which could only come from prompt criticality) was re-evaluated to nothing.
    by Bobby1 6/3/2011 4:26:39 PM

  • Out for an hour :)
    by elainekirk 6/3/2011 4:26:43 PM

  • @all This article posted earlier says the megafloat already towed away 10,000 tons of water. I don't believe they have used the megafloat yet. www.washingtonpost.com
    by RBeaner 6/3/2011 4:36:21 PM

  • @Edano , I thought dry well and wet well were imbedded in concrete. @Bobby1, thanks for the insight.
    by Peter Melzer 6/3/2011 4:36:55 PM

  • @Peter Melzer : i made a rough google search and found this:
    "Mr. Hidehiko Nishiyama, Senior Counselor of NISA, at a press interview made on April 18, admitted that the some fraction of pellets appear to be molten. The basis of this assessment is through detection of radioactive species resulting from melting in 1F2 and 3, as well as hydrogen explosion occurred in 1F1 he explained.

    The Nuclear Safety Commission, at its committee meeting held on April 18, presented more detailed basis of NISA’s explanation. The reason that they conclude melting of fuel pellets is due to the observation that:

    (1) From 1F2, the nuclear species that should not have been released unless by melting were released. Tc-99m (T1/2=6h, 9E+04 Bq/cm3), La-140 (T1/2=2d, 1.9E+05), Ba-140 (T1/2=13d, 4.9E+05 Bq/cm3)" www.ambersharick.com
    so they found specific elements before april 18. but i remember a different source maybe i find it.
    by Edano 6/3/2011 4:37:45 PM

  • @elainekirk , that is why I am in favor of drying
    ponds.
    by Peter Melzer 6/3/2011 4:38:02 PM

  • @Bobby1 ah, you found it ! thx ! :)
    by Edano 6/3/2011 4:40:09 PM

  • @Edano , I don't doubt a meltdown, nobody does anymore. I was wondering whether the released isotopes do not tell us where the melt got to, along Bobby1's observations.
    by Peter Melzer 6/3/2011 4:41:17 PM

  • @Edano We now know that #1 was melting down as well, I don't know if Tepco measured these isotopes or not under there.
    by Bobby1 6/3/2011 4:44:01 PM

  • @Peter Melzer :as far as i understand, they only stem from concrete-corium reactions. you have to read between the lines. they say, they found la140 and ba140 then there was a meltdown ......... and a reaction with concrete
    by Edano 6/3/2011 4:52:04 PM

  • @Bobby1 : i am still searching for these infos, but there is no official qualified report on these readings. i am sure they have exact readings, but they will not show them until they are urged to do so.
    by Edano edited by Edano 6/3/2011 4:54:31 PM

  • @Edano Richard Lahey saw this and concluded that corium had already escaped containment at that time in #2. If by "official" you mean Tepco, don't hold your breath.
    by Bobby1 6/3/2011 4:57:01 PM

  • @radioguy , re "natural", the label only indicates that these radionuclides are members of the three natural chains of radioactive decay: www.google.com
    by Peter Melzer 6/3/2011 5:01:30 PM

  • @Peter Melzer : i have ba140, la140 and ce144 in #3 on march 25: www.tepco.co.jp these are the "puddle" readings.
    by Edano edited by Edano 6/3/2011 5:05:59 PM

  • Japan’s Tea Industry Facing Shortage as Nuclear Radiation Taints Shipments
    Green Tea Sits On Display


    Japan may face a shortage of green tea as radiation leaking from the crippled Fukushima Dai-Ichi power station tainted leaves, spurring the government to restrict shipments from four prefectures.
    The government decided yesterday to curb shipments of dried tea leaves containing more than 500 becquerel per kilogram of radioactive cesium and ordered a halt in shipments from the eastern prefectures of Ibaraki, Chiba, Kanagawa and Tochigi where tainted produce was detected. Japan’s tea production, including fresh and dried leaves, was worth 102.1 billion yen ($1.3 billion) in 2009, according to the agriculture ministry.
    One of the test results showed fresh tea leaves from Izu city in the prefecture contained 98 becquerel of cesium per kilogram, according to the Shizuoka website.
    The government made the decision because green tea is also processed into seasoning for various food products including cookies and ice cream, said Taku Ohara at the inspection and safety division of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare.

    “As dried tea leaves could be consumed directly by humans, we need to test them and ban sales of tainted products,” he said today by phone.

    “We have not tested dried tea leaves as they are used in the middle of tea processing and are not a finished product. We have tested fresh tea leaves and tea drinks,” said Toshiyuki Aoki, assistant director at the office of tea and agricultural production at the Shizuoka prefectural government. “We would like to decide how to respond through discussion with government officials.”
    Full story: www.bloomberg.com
    by joniver 6/3/2011 5:10:03 PM

  • @Edano We can conclude from these readings that there has been a widespread strontium release into the atmosphere. The tiny amount of cherry-picked amounts released so far cannot represent the full situaution. The deception goes on.
    by Bobby1 6/3/2011 5:13:58 PM

  • imagine: at the time the workers stepped into the "puddles" we already had 3 meltdowns and corium on the drywell bottom ...... makes me shiver.
    by Edano edited by Edano 6/3/2011 5:16:23 PM

  • Doctor describes fatigue of workers at Fukushima nuclear plant
    Newly released photographs taken by a doctor who has examined workers at the crippled Fukushima nuclear power plant show the difficult living conditions they have endured while battling to bring the situation under control.
    More:


  • The latest CTBTO readings from Takasaki www.cpdnp.jp indicate re-criticality (enhanced iodine levels) from May 22-26, and there are still significant amounts of lanthanum (La-140) and especially tellurium (Te-129 & Te-129m) being emitted.
    by Bobby1 6/3/2011 5:29:42 PM

  • Federal Officials Heckled at Meeting on Indian Point Nuclear Plant
    Audience members at a raucous public meeting on safety at Indian Point nuclear plant Thursday night heckled officials from the Nuclear Regulatory Commission — calling the federal officials "Liars!" and "lap dogs!"

    NRC officials, who planned detail the lessons learned from the Fukushima nuclear meltdown in Japan, said the facility had operated safely in 2010, was built to withstand attacks and has regular security checks.
    The meeting was the first opportunity for public comment on the agency's regulation of the nuclear facility since the crisis at the reactor in Japan began to unfold in March.
    www.wnyc.org
    by joniver 6/3/2011 5:33:27 PM

  • Startup Kurion Ships Nuclear Clean Up Tech to Japan
    Nuclear waste cleanup startup Kurion says it has shipped several hundred tons of its equipment that will be used to clean contaminated water at the Fukushima nuclear power plants in Japan that suffered damage in the wake of the earthquake and tsunami. Kurion says some of its engineers have already arrived at the Fukushima sites, and more will arrive over the next two weeks, and by June Kurion expects its radioactive water cleaning technology to be installed at the nuclear plants. We reported in April that Kurion was working on the Japanese nuclear disaster.

    Kurion’s technology, and business plan, is to make the process of vitrification — turning nuclear waste into glass — modular, which makes it cheaper, faster and more efficient. Vitrification is the standard way to clean up nuclear waste, and Kurion essentially brings the technology to the waste tanks, instead of taking the waste to a massive centralized treatment plant.

    Before Kurion turns the waste into glass, it uses a material to soak up the waste, which it calls “ion specific media,” and then shrinks the material down to a small enough size so that it can be turned into glass. Vitrification essentially permanently encapsulates the nuclear waste, and while it’s still radioactive, the waste can be stored and transported more easily.

    Kurion says at the Fukushima plants, its technology will be used on radioactive contaminated water that is in the turbine buildings, as well as on new cooling water that is being added every day. Some of the more standard nuclear cleanup materials couldn’t be used because they don’t work with saltwater, and sea water was pumped into the Fukushima plants in order to cool the reactor in response to the disaster.
    More: gigaom.com
    by joniver 6/3/2011 5:38:35 PM

  • @radioguy , in ref to the other post on brawn, radioactive decay distributes according to a Poisson distribution: stattrek.com which is skewed to the left, and not according to a symmetrical bell-shaped curve. However, the author's point of increased Pu-238/Pu-239 ratios may be interesting. In Japan Tepco calculates a Pu-238/(Pu-238+Pu-240) ratio. If it was greater than 0.026, the plutonium would stem from an incident other than above-ground nuclear testing. However, the heightened ratio observed in California does not tell you anything about the source.
    by Peter Melzer 6/3/2011 5:47:38 PM

  • Fukushima Water Has More Radiation Than Released Into Air
    The water level in basements and trenches at Tokyo Electric Power Co.'s Fukushima plant rose and may contain more radiation than is known to have been released into the atmosphere in the worst nuclear crisis since Chernobyl.
    The amount of contaminated water rose to about 105 million liters (28 million gallons) from 100 million liters on May 18, and may start overflowing after June 20, the company known as Tepco said in a statement today. Radiation in the water is estimated at 720,000 terabecquerels, general manager Junichi Matsumoto said at a media briefing in Tokyo.
    With Japan's rainy season in full swing, heavy downpours threaten to flood the plant and leak more radiation into the sea, soil and air.
    "The risk of overflow is as serious as the meltdown of reactor fuel rods that's already happened," Tetsuo Ito, the head of the Atomic Energy Research Institute at Kinki University in western Japan, said in a phone interview. "Tepco should've acknowledged this risk weeks ago and could've taken any urgent measures.
    A water de-contamination unit being built at the plant will start operating after June 15 and an underground tank capable of holding 10 million liters will be ready by the middle of August, Tepco said in today's statement.
    More: www.sfgate.com
    by joniver 6/3/2011 5:47:42 PM

  • Quake watchers there is a report on a Fukushima quake yesterday that appears to have had an impact on the nuclear plant Daiichi translate.google.com
    by elainekirk 6/3/2011 6:27:28 PM

  • www.asahicom.jp
    Miyagi Prefecture, the reconstruction plan road and rail
    www.asahi.com

    by elainekirk via Asahicom.jp 6/3/2011 6:31:58 PM

  • Fukushima Radioactive Water May Breach Plant’s Storage Trenches in 5 Days
    Radioactive water accumulating in Japan’s crippled Fukushima plant may start overflowing from service trenches in five days, potentially increasing the contamination from the worst nuclear crisis since Chernobyl.
    Tokyo Electric Power Co. has been manually pumping water into overheating reactors after cooling systems broke down and much of that has overflowed into basements and trenches. The water is rising at a rate that means it will overflow as early as June 6, Bloomberg calculations from the company’s data show.
    “There is still a risk of radioactive water leaking into the sea,” Hikaru Kuroda, an official at the utility known as Tepco, said in Tokyo today. “We may have between five and seven days before the water levels reach the top of the trenches.
    Almost 60 percent of Japanese adults worry they’ve been contaminated since Fukushima started emitting radiation almost three months ago, according to a Pew Research Center poll. The poll shows at least 80 percent of the population is dissatisfied with the response either from Tepco or the government of Prime Minister Naoto Kan, who survived a no-confidence vote today.
    More: www.bloomberg.com
    by joniver 6/3/2011 6:35:15 PM

  • @joniver I think 5 days is optimistic I noticed another link further down where tepco say they have another 20days but the only way I can see that happening is if they are knowingly letting it wash into the ocean
    by elainekirk 6/3/2011 6:39:25 PM

  • www.asahicom.jp
    So #1 blew because the hydrogen they 'vented' went directly back into the unit through their discredited venting system www.asahi.com

    by elainekirk via Asahicom.jp 6/3/2011 6:40:59 PM

  • @elainekirk Do we believe Tepco?
    by joniver 6/3/2011 6:51:47 PM

  • @joniver that is a mute question as tepco may well 'know' that they will release a load on that day, I could be a real conspiracy theorist and say we should check the ocean currents, tides etc for the days they have had 'accidental' releases and see if we can predict the next 'accident'
    So to answer your question, No I don't believe tepco I believe they are at their limit and are dumping as we speak but I also believe they know the date when they are going to announce the ongoing dumping as a one-off event
    by elainekirk 6/3/2011 6:56:13 PM

  • Mines and Mineral Processing Facilities in the Vicinity of the March 11, 2011, Earthquake in Northern Honshu, Japan pubs.usgs.gov
    by deb 6/3/2011 6:56:49 PM

  • How long have i been preaching the water levels in tunnel / trenches?...they have been releasing.no question !
    by Veenie 6/3/2011 6:57:32 PM

  • @elainekirk I think the point is we should search for that information whether we believe in TEPCO or not. We need to search data from independent sources. Belief in TEPCO is, as I see it at the moment, quite irrelevant. In what concerns faith though, I do hope TEPCO can sort this out soon (within a year).
    by Pedro Jesus 6/3/2011 6:59:48 PM

  • Updated: Marine Scientists Begin Cruise off Fukushima

    "Update, 3 June:
    In an interview last night with ScienceInsider, expedition lead investigator Buesseler explained that in addition to the well-known isotopes iodine-131 and cesium-137, the cruise will measure the spread and bioaccumulation of rarer isotopes such as plutonium, strontium, and tritium, about which little is known.

    It's hard to say, Buesseler says, what impact on the marine environment this overflow would have, but his crew will be there at the right time to measure a baseline. The expected overflow of cooling water from the plant, atomic energy researchers report today, could be as serious as the meltdown itself due to the estimated 720,000 terabecquerels of radiation in it.
    (By comparison, 630,000 terabecquerels of radiation were released into the atmosphere as of 15 April.)"
    news.sciencemag.org
    by Reed 6/3/2011 7:09:09 PM

Japan Earthquake | Page 1489

Who's Blogging
  • hudebnikhudebnik
  • albleealblee
  • UKValUKVal
  • Oliver (ScribbleLive)Oliver (ScribbleLive)
  • Jonathan KeeblerJonathan Keebler
  • kaykodhkaykodh
  • PKelleyPKelley
  • MarkfmMarkfm
  • AngieAngie
  • DebDeb
  • Mid ValleyMid Valley
  • Pedro Jesus
  • Matt (ScribbleLive)Matt (ScribbleLive)
  • George GibbGeorge Gibb
  • elainekirkelainekirk
  • lillymunsterlillymunster
  • deandean
  • bobo
  • EdanoEdano
  • IanGoddardIanGoddard