
@radioguy Nobody thought to put a manual and set of blueprints in the earthquake proof building that was supposed to be the emergency command center.
by lillymunster 6/20/2011 1:21:25 AM

@radioguy there was a set of blueprints in the office building that were either ruined or inaccessible after the quake. They had to get a copy set from a contractor that had them.
by lillymunster 6/20/2011 1:29:06 AM

@Peter Melzer I have pictures of isolation control valves from unit 3, don't think that is part of the IC system though.
by lillymunster 6/20/2011 1:42:10 AM

@Peter Melzer I see what your getting at. If Fuku unit 1 didn't have an IC, then the same reactor built elsewhere in that same early time period would likely not have an IC either. There has to be another very early BWR in the US or Japan of the same vintage.
by lillymunster 6/20/2011 1:56:21 AM

@Peter Melzer From the Wikipedia page on Oyster Creek the plant was built between 1965-69, was online in 69, reactor built by GE, construction handled by a construction company. You would think if GE built unit 1 at FUKU all themselves and were adamant that nothing be changed or void the warranty then it would have the same or better than Oyster Creek. I do know that unit 1 has a different array of cooling systems than the others there. I can't remember what device it is but #1 has an older technology while 2-4 have a newer option. I can't remember if it is the IC or something else. Dean might remember. But it seems like the GE comments that #1 lacked a piece of equipment is not true.
by lillymunster 6/20/2011 2:13:05 AM

@bo That article has some heavy reality to it. I would hope someone would start trying to find out why the red cross money is not going out and someone finally do something about the welfare cut offs.
by lillymunster 6/20/2011 2:15:21 AM

@LM The corporate office yes, if they had time to blacklist actors but can't get ice vests for the workers or more resources to the plant it says much about their priorities. They need to be relieved of control but keep the plant staff in place. I would say have the govt. run it but they seem to not have it as a priority either. Maybe there needs to be more international pressure.
by lillymunster 6/20/2011 2:19:20 AM

@bo If people around the world knew they made donations and the govt. is still sitting on them they would be angry. At some point abandoning your people when your a first world country damages your reputation. That may be what it would take to put a stop to some of this. I would hope with the world more connected it would be harder to continue to get away with some of this.
by lillymunster 6/20/2011 2:21:49 AM

IAEA meeting about Fukushima, no public, no reporters allowed, hand picked crowd of attendees for the meeting.
www.bloomberg.comby lillymunster 6/20/2011 2:24:36 AM

@bo I believe there were other relief groups that may have donated money. There have been some mentions in the media about money still not making it past levels of govt. to people.
by lillymunster 6/20/2011 2:26:00 AM

@LM The elected govt. in the US doesn't want to talk about it and the media finds it inconvenient. Even just taking the lowest self preservation point of view having the Pacific ocean full of radioactive contamination is worth complaining about or trying to stop. I am as mad at our govt. as I am at the GoJ.
by lillymunster 6/20/2011 2:28:48 AM

@LM The GoJ turned down offers of equipment and help. I would bet if those were offered to the local government in an area they would have accepted.
by lillymunster 6/20/2011 2:35:40 AM

@LM It is easy to see where the disconnects are, TEPCO corporate, national government offices and agencies that are way too cozy with the big corporations.
by lillymunster 6/20/2011 2:42:38 AM

@Peter Melzer That is the turbine building one I mentioned.
by lillymunster 6/20/2011 2:48:16 AM