
In looking for MOX inspections I found a bunch of METI reports scolding TEPCO for going too long without inspecting things. One report had over 100 pieces of equipment at Kashiwazaki and Fukushima that needed inspection. Most of these reports are 2011 before the quake or 2010.
www.meti.go.jpby lillymunster 7/5/2011 7:04:33 PM

back
by dean 7/5/2011 7:23:00 PM

@Elaine Kirk Ironic in light of the Atlantic articles and Peter's paper on the equipment issues. I didn't dig into them to see if any of the parts thought to have failed are on the list of not inspected parts or not.
by lillymunster 7/5/2011 7:34:29 PM

Dear TEPCO,
You have not inspected large amounts of your equipment at your plants but we will still let you load plutonium in your ancient reactor unit.
Love,
METI
by lillymunster 7/5/2011 7:41:52 PM

@Ian I have been doing more content over on Simplyinfo. Houseoffoust site will be more image documentation since that frequently can't fit into the image formats of the group site. Probably going to remove my newslinks section and link over to Simplyinfo for news. Something else I am working on is a documents archive on the Simplyinfo site so we can store text and pdf documents in an organized manner for all these manuals and saved reports. That probably won't be installed until I get the new theme template done. Still doing testing on that to work out the bugs.
by lillymunster 7/5/2011 7:45:00 PM

I'm going back over those METI reports I mentioned. They complained to TEPCO of about 50 uninspected items on Feb 2 2011, and gave them until Feb 28, 2011 to get things handled. On Feb 28 METI wrote to TEPCO with the 100+ past due inspections. I am going to crunch numbers and write something up.
by lillymunster 7/5/2011 7:53:25 PM

@Peter Melzer finding a few valves, quite a few references to emergency generator parts. It seems with some of the items they did a cursory inspection last minute after METI hounded them. Some are ambiguous if they were inspected or not.
by lillymunster 7/5/2011 8:15:34 PM

@Ian IIRC I think the assemblies might be 8in x 8in. One of the GE manuals should say.
by lillymunster 7/5/2011 8:16:07 PM

@Peter are you still there
by dean 7/5/2011 8:32:22 PM

en.wikipedia.org @lilly.. here are some international symbols which could be used as part of the signs or postings up in those areas... radiation sign, non-ionizing and ionizing sighs, biohazard, warning signs..etc.. .
by dean 7/5/2011 8:37:59 PM

as well as getting some radiation plastic tape to identify areas
by dean 7/5/2011 8:38:28 PM

en.wikipedia.org more detail with explanations
by dean 7/5/2011 8:39:11 PM

by dean 7/5/2011 8:40:07 PM

will return
by dean 7/5/2011 8:43:31 PM

From the METI 2.28.2011 report of past due inspections
by lillymunster 7/5/2011 9:54:52 PM

Kashiwazaki past due inspections: (from 28th METI report)
117 total (258 according to details)
Unit 1: 33 electrical equipment
Unit 2: 45 electrical equipment
Unit 3: 77 equipment
Unit 4: 30 equipment
Unit 5: 38 equipment
Unit 6: 1 device
Shared: 34 equipment
Fukushima Daiichi past due inspections (From 28th METI report)
33 total
Unit 1 recirculation pump
Unit 2 3 devices reactor watr port
Unit 3 5 total devices such as oil separator extractor pump for gas turbine
Unit 4 two emergency diesel seawater cooling pumps
Unit 5 3 devices, one being recirculation generator motor conditioner
also at 5, 11 devices including switching equipment, oil cooler valve, 2 reactor feed pump drive turbines
Unit 6 6 devices including electrical equipment, valves for residual heat removal system
16 items had been inspected by the report issuance, 15 remaining, remaining outstanding
Fukushima Daini past due inspections (From 28th METI report)
21 total
Unit 1: exhaust file
Unit 2: high voltage cable for auxiliary electric water pump seal "storage"
Unit 3: 4 instrument equipment for emergency diesel engines (lubricating oil cooler etc)
Unit 4: residual heat removal pump motor(s)
20 were inspected by end of report.
Unit 2 turbine driven feedwater pumps exhaust valves
by lillymunster 7/5/2011 9:54:54 PM

@es LOL. Gotta give them proper credit.
by lillymunster 7/5/2011 10:32:17 PM

by George Gibb 7/5/2011 10:35:08 PM