
Nuclear accidents that are increasingly happening worldwide prompted researchers to conduct numerous investigations with the aim to reduce the presence of biologically harmful radionuclides in animal food. Binding and immobilization of radioisotopes in the digestive tract of animals and their elimination, in the case of alimentary radiocontamination, are of extreme significance for meat production. This study aims to present a set of measures necessary for protecting animals in emergency conditions to obtain radionuclide-free products. The procedures to be applied are divided into basic and special protective measures. Special attention is paid to special protective measures, in which we recommend two procedures: change of animal diet composition and use of a radioprotector. Their application might reduce distribution of 137Cs in meat by about 90%. These protective measures and technological procedures for meat processing might contribute to obtaining radionuclide-free meat products and subsequently, protection of humans from radioactive contamination.
by dean 7/9/2011 2:25:48 PM

have to check up on what a "radioprotector is" may be useful in japan
by dean 7/9/2011 2:26:36 PM

not sure LM but we could do some research and pass on to those like bo who may be able to disseminate the information
by dean 7/9/2011 2:30:00 PM

@dean please do! @LM we are being vigilant, but there is only so much we can do on the consumption end. Things are labeled in terms of where they come from. Most of our produce here in Western Japan comes from this region. Much of the beef comes from Australia. We are trying to eat "low on the food chain" in other words not so much meat or fish, but fish is hard to avoid when you are out. We try to eat mostly fish from the Seto Island Sea, which Hiroshima is beside. This sea gets less ocean currents, and the fish are smaller and fresher. But we can't really hide from the food supply here. Our fears are that a lot of contaminated food will end up in processed foods, so we stay away from them.
by bo 7/9/2011 2:30:27 PM

@ Peter, the balance equation on using mox seems fruitless.. I think in the beginning the proliferation was a big deal and .. japan was thinking they were going to be dealing with a crisis of spent fuel storage so they thought. hey,, we'll ship fuel to ENGLAND or FRANCE...
by dean 7/9/2011 2:32:06 PM

@RadioGuy exactly. Not eating any katsuo!! Which is a shame, cause it is delicious!
by bo 7/9/2011 2:32:53 PM

worthy of research @ Peter.. that article I posted was a first I've seen
by dean 7/9/2011 2:33:20 PM

www.irpa.net APPLICATION OF RADIORECEPTORS IN RADIATION PROTECTION
by dean 7/9/2011 2:35:48 PM

THE animals would probably suffer the side afffects but if it meant lower levels of contamination that would be good... also.. sounds like some technology needs to spring up on treating food before feeding the animals etc..
by dean 7/9/2011 2:36:43 PM

@RadioGuy no no no. You need to use short term thinking.
by bo 7/9/2011 2:45:00 PM

I think that each prefecture (spelling) should set up their own rad testing within.. get a lab for testing and whole body counters set up.. make it routine for the people there
by dean 7/9/2011 2:45:29 PM

bo.. the governors of the prefectures ,,, don't they have an administrative and health depart for each? are they like mayors? or governors
by dean 7/9/2011 2:46:53 PM

@RadioGuy they are sunning beside the beautiful river Denial. The most beautiful river in the entire world.
by bo 7/9/2011 2:47:04 PM

@dean Japan is a very centralized country. I'm not sure what infrastructure the governors have, but it would not be up to the task of monitoring the food supply, plus that would be a great departure. It may happen, but it would be a very new phenomenon. To be honest, where are the politicians who are opportunistic enough to get out in front of this parade, cause it is already leaving the barn.
by bo 7/9/2011 2:51:53 PM

@RadioGuy don't make me cry.
by bo 7/9/2011 2:54:14 PM

I expect to see more and more involvement of local government and public organizations in decisions relating to hazardous industry etc.. and the same for governors of states in USA.. there has been challenges raised recently by some state governors when it comes to them saying NO to a nuclear facility or MOX fuel systems etc....
by dean 7/9/2011 2:55:35 PM

from what we've seen.. it sure doesn't look like nuclear or other industry is going away... coal plants.. nuc plants .. other industry that can be harmful to health etc... yet we monitor and say.. man that's too high.. emmissions etc.. but.. short of cleaning up emissions.. the industry at large needs to perhaps put more focus on TREATMENT,, food chain alternative treatments etc... so what we eat is the best it can be to be free from contaminants
by dean 7/9/2011 2:57:59 PM

@RadioGuy.. another deal where the company will freak out over the SWING IN STOCK PRICE.. then start making decisions based on it
by dean 7/9/2011 3:01:21 PM

another reason I want PUBLIC UTILITY companies to be taken off the stock markets... then they can worry on the more important thing.. lives..
by dean 7/9/2011 3:03:03 PM

I must depart for a bit.. have a great day all.. will be back later..
by dean 7/9/2011 3:03:32 PM