
in europe, there is always the discussion about planes hitting the nukes. when i understand it right, the fuku reactors (and all the others without dome and with spent fuel pools next to the reactors) are not in any way safe against plane crashs. i wonder that there is no discussion about it.
by Edano 7/9/2011 11:06:51 PM

true Edano
by dean 7/9/2011 11:08:40 PM

but.. if the plane crashed through the outer shell.. it probably wouldn't crash through the concrete containment.. as if that mattered because the spent fuel pool is vulnerable
by dean 7/9/2011 11:09:19 PM

@dean i guess a destroyed pool is disaster enough - and there will be no way to get near the reactor anymore. and you can hardly remote control them.
by Edano 7/9/2011 11:10:50 PM

right Edano... I suspose a 747 directly hitting a fuku.. plant if fully loaded with fuel .. would be one **** of a mess
by dean 7/9/2011 11:12:29 PM

@dean i fear even a bigger cessna could do it if it hits the sfp wall directly.
by Edano 7/9/2011 11:15:06 PM

true
by dean 7/9/2011 11:15:26 PM

my dinner ready.. be back
by dean 7/9/2011 11:15:38 PM

Dean, so Cooper has a square building like Fuku but that building is likely heavy duty concrete rather than a blow away thin shell? IIRC some of the other US reactors I have seen have that round silo type heavy concrete, I am guessing that is in place of the concrete bulb type used at Fuku? So cooper's steel containment is just an inner layer and the thick concrete is just a separate device doubling as outer building?
by lillymunster 7/9/2011 11:16:13 PM

COOPER
3. Vent Valves
Vent valves were added to CS A upstream of the flow element (FE), and to emergency
condensate storage tank (ECST) outlet pipe diameter enlargement to HPCI suction and upstream
of the HPCI FE. CS B does not have a similar configuration, and a vent valve was not needed.
For RHR trains A and B steam condensing mode piping, the RV was removed and replaced with
an elbow and vent valve assembly. A vent valve was added to the RHR Train A Service Water
(SW) injection connection.
As an enhancement for HPCI restoration after maintenance, vent valves were added to the lube
oil cooler and two other unvented high points in the auxiliary cooling subsystem.
4. Procedures
The appropriate fill-and-vent and surveillance procedures were revised to add the use of the new
vent valves. As described in NPPD's response to Question 3 of the NRC Request for Additional
Information (Reference 6), NPPD also revised the appropriate fill-and-vent and surveillance
procedures for UT at specific locations. The procedures were also revised to provide specific
instructions for documenting in the Corrective Action Program (CAP) gas voids or gas entrained
water identified during venting
pbadupws.nrc.govby elainekirk 7/9/2011 11:19:43 PM

@lillymunster from a statical point of view, i would guess the domes should be more resistant to a plenty of posibilities...
by Edano 7/9/2011 11:20:00 PM

reading what lilly and elaine put up
by dean 7/9/2011 11:23:02 PM

@lilly.. I would have to confirm that about cooper ,,, having a heavy square containment isn't as strong as the dome type.. will study it..
by dean 7/9/2011 11:26:04 PM

will research it to be sure..
by dean 7/9/2011 11:27:44 PM

Posted: 8:34 AM Jul 4, 2011
Petition Filed to Shut Down Cooper Nuclear Power Plant
Brownville, Neb.
An Enforcement Petition has been filed with the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) requesting that the agency issue a Confirmatory Order requiring the shut-down of the Cooper Nuclear Station operated by Nebraska Public District.
by dean 7/9/2011 11:29:48 PM

@dean will see if I can dig up more images also
by lillymunster 7/9/2011 11:29:53 PM

ok.. I will return in a bit
by dean 7/9/2011 11:31:31 PM

@ms in la mostly and any radiation poses no immediate risk to health why is there no regulation over the movement of this stuff
by elainekirk 7/9/2011 11:48:23 PM

@Peter Melzer it does it needs the company at least to look into it
by elainekirk 7/10/2011 12:01:01 AM

Cooper couldnt have shut down safetly in the event of a fire in this report issued in Marh after a Nov 2010 inspection
pbadupws.nrc.govby elainekirk 7/10/2011 12:02:32 AM

Some images of Cooper to review regarding containment
wp.meby lillymunster 7/10/2011 12:04:39 AM

@lillymunster well found :) @ms in la yeah nobody is gonna sit in a radioactive truck all day volunarily
by elainekirk 7/10/2011 12:11:20 AM

How far was that guy hauling that stuff? Long cross country drive could have added up.
by lillymunster 7/10/2011 12:15:36 AM

@Peter Melzer @ms in la @lillymunster I think the vid needs verifying and I need sleep I will bid you all g'night
by elainekirk 7/10/2011 12:21:58 AM

@elainekirk Nite Elaine!
by lillymunster 7/10/2011 12:24:17 AM

just a final thought when did tepco do the measurements that showed a 30cm? drop and where does the incline start ? if it was measured in month 2 and we can visually see it over month 4 then....
by elainekirk 7/10/2011 12:36:25 AM

I really want to find that cooper stuff
by elainekirk 7/10/2011 12:36:48 AM

@elainekirk May 16
Vertical: - 50 centimeters (it sank 50 centimeters)
Horizontal: 220 to 250 centimeters to the east.
by lillymunster 7/10/2011 12:38:47 AM

There are two plots at Ex-SKF that could possibly be used to pinpoint movement more
ex-skf.blogspot.comby lillymunster 7/10/2011 12:40:24 AM

@lillymunster and that was blogged May 16th
by elainekirk 7/10/2011 12:49:57 AM

@elainekirk right and the data was obviously gathered before than and we know some things have shifted since then.
by lillymunster 7/10/2011 12:54:15 AM

@lillymunster it is a mess I dont see how they expect those sfp's to last another 3yrs
by elainekirk 7/10/2011 12:55:42 AM

@Peter Melzer new to me, convenient overview. Grabbed it for the US BWR data collection.
by lillymunster 7/10/2011 1:01:54 AM