Japan Earthquake | Page 2102

  • unless we have the limits in those units... I wonder it must be MBq/km2
    by dean 8/8/2011 3:10:27 AM

  • That was everyone's learning curve. The numbers were in an odd expression.
    Edano calculated the converstion to this:
    MBq = 1,000,000 Bq, km² = 1,000,000 m²
    so 1 MBq/km² is the same as 1 Bq/m²
    by lillymunster 8/8/2011 3:11:01 AM

  • let me see
    by dean 8/8/2011 3:14:18 AM

  • 1 millicurie = 37 megabecquerel (MBq)
    by dean 8/8/2011 3:15:09 AM

  • I guesstimated about 91 bq to a square inch of soil.
    by lillymunster 8/8/2011 3:16:27 AM

  • 1 Bq ~= to 27 picocurie
    by dean 8/8/2011 3:16:53 AM

  • that's very low I'd say...
    by dean 8/8/2011 3:18:41 AM

  • by dean 8/8/2011 3:19:00 AM

  • plug that in .. converted Bq to millicurie
    by dean 8/8/2011 3:19:21 AM

  • comes up to about 800 millicuries
    by dean 8/8/2011 3:19:45 AM

  • Thats good that it isn't really high. There was an online post someone claiming it was sky high. Still not sure why it took METI until july to release march data...
    by lillymunster 8/8/2011 3:22:32 AM

  • I wanted to compare that to a limit for foods etc
    by dean 8/8/2011 3:23:20 AM

  • The spinach contained 54,100 Bq/kg of I-131 and 1,931 Bq/kg of cesium. That means consuming 1 kilogram (2.2 pounds) of fresh spinach would yield a radiation exposure of 1.2 millisieverts, or half the average annual natural exposure from soil and cosmic rays, based on Bloomberg calculations using a formula posted on the website of Japan’s
    by dean 8/8/2011 3:24:11 AM

  • that came from a link I just looked at
    by dean 8/8/2011 3:24:24 AM

  • they are giving a general level over the soil
    by dean 8/8/2011 3:25:17 AM

  • Elaine was asking earlier and Will wanted to make sure he had the numbers correct for something he is working on.
    by lillymunster 8/8/2011 3:28:09 AM

  • thats important to correlate what they report to some limits and get the units right ... most plant numbers have Bq's/kg..etc...
    by dean 8/8/2011 3:29:27 AM

  • so Bq/m2 would convert over to some limit for ground contamination
    by dean 8/8/2011 3:30:19 AM

  • Radioactive strontium-89 and strontium-90 were discovered in soil at the plant on 18 April, amounts detected in soil one-half kilometer from the facility ranged from 3.4 to 4400 Bq/kg of dry soil THAT'S an example
    by dean 8/8/2011 3:30:52 AM

  • All soil samples taken 60 km from Fukushima plant survey exceed legal limit — Minimum of 326,000 Becquerels per sq. meter
    by dean 8/8/2011 3:34:08 AM

  • thats the limit evidently
    by dean 8/8/2011 3:34:57 AM

  • 30,000 Bq/sq.meter...as opposedto 326,000...
    by dean 8/8/2011 3:38:22 AM

  • or 29000 from the table for the high
    by dean 8/8/2011 3:38:36 AM

  • for I-131
    by dean 8/8/2011 3:38:41 AM

  • I thought we had the limits on the web site somewhere.. they are so hard to remember
    by dean 8/8/2011 3:39:26 AM

  • Yes I put all the limits on the FAQ page. I should grab those and put them into the resources on the group web. I added a weather links page but need to link it into the navigation to find it easier. Thunder had a big write up of resources plus what you and some others posted.
    by lillymunster 8/8/2011 3:40:36 AM

  • [... A] survey of soil at four locations in the city of Fukushima on June 26 found that all samples were contaminated with radioactive cesium, measuring 16,000 to 46,000 becquerels per kilogram and exceeding the legal limit of 10,000 becquerels per kg, citizens groups involved said Tuesday.

    The city, about 60 kilometers northwest of the crippled plant, does not fall within the 20-km no-entry zone or nearby evacuation areas.

    One location registered as much as 931,000 becquerels per square meter, surpassing the 555,000 becquerels per sq meter limit for compulsory resettlement in the 1986 Chernobyl nuclear accident. Samples from the other three locations measured between 326,000 and 384,000 becquerels per sq meter. THAT one is for Cs and compares to the "compulsory resettlement in chernobyl'
    by dean 8/8/2011 3:41:23 AM

  • sounds good lilly
    by dean 8/8/2011 3:41:54 AM

  • good info, thanks Dean. I'm off to bed before the storm hits.
    by lillymunster 8/8/2011 3:42:29 AM

  • as am I... rest well...
    by dean 8/8/2011 3:43:21 AM

  • Event closed for some reason. Sorry for the glitch.
    by bo 8/8/2011 4:56:46 AM

  • And a boot!
    by bo 8/8/2011 7:22:23 AM

  • and the other boot
    by elainekirk 8/8/2011 7:53:27 AM

  • www.tepco.co.jp and just look at this for /leakage/pump failure/blockage/rupture/etc potential ! Flippin eck, it looks to be designed with failure built in, Tepco will be so happy

    by elainekirk 8/8/2011 8:03:38 AM

  • sewage in Tokyo is becoming a problem eco.nikkeibp.co.jp
    by elainekirk 8/8/2011 8:46:00 AM

  • Tepco have a unique leak here more to follow

    by elainekirk 8/8/2011 9:06:19 AM

  • another view of the unique leak

    by elainekirk 8/8/2011 9:07:02 AM

  • And here we have it the leak is in the electrical system www.tepco.co.jp

    by elainekirk 8/8/2011 9:09:37 AM

  • Study says nuclear fuel at Fukushima reactor possibly melted twice

    TOKYO, Aug. 8, Kyodo
    english.kyodonews.jp
    by Edano 8/8/2011 9:37:58 AM

  • @Edano does that mean cooling started then it flared up again ?
    by elainekirk 8/8/2011 9:40:11 AM

  • @elainekirk kyodo won't tell us...
    by Edano 8/8/2011 9:42:11 AM

  • ---------- Study says nuclear fuel at Fukushima reactor possibly melted twice TOKYO - Fuel inside one of the reactors at the crippled nuclear complex in Fukushima Prefecture, which was believed to have been kept cool at the bottom of the pressure vessel after its core suffered a meltdown, has possibly breached the vessel after melting again at the bottom of the vessel, an expert's study showed Monday.

    The study by Fumiya Tanabe, an expert in nuclear safety, said most of the fuel at the No. 3 reactor may have fallen into the containment vessel underneath, and if so, the current method used to cool the reactor would need reviewing, which could force the plant operator to revise its schedule to contain the five-month-old disaster.
    www.mspnews.com
    by Edano 8/8/2011 9:44:44 AM

  • haha, i tricked them out !
    by Edano 8/8/2011 9:45:07 AM

  • hmmm, i don't need to be an expert to forsee this scenario ....
    by Edano 8/8/2011 9:49:16 AM

  • @Edano oh yes well done!!
    #
    by elainekirk 8/8/2011 9:52:14 AM

Japan Earthquake | Page 2102

Who's Blogging
  • hudebnikhudebnik
  • albleealblee
  • UKValUKVal
  • Oliver (ScribbleLive)Oliver (ScribbleLive)
  • Jonathan KeeblerJonathan Keebler
  • kaykodhkaykodh
  • PKelleyPKelley
  • MarkfmMarkfm
  • AngieAngie
  • DebDeb
  • Mid ValleyMid Valley
  • Pedro Jesus
  • Matt (ScribbleLive)Matt (ScribbleLive)
  • George GibbGeorge Gibb
  • elainekirkelainekirk
  • lillymunsterlillymunster
  • deandean
  • bobo
  • EdanoEdano
  • IanGoddardIanGoddard