
@RadioGuy there was an announcement a few years ago that providers were to cut back on CT scan use due to these new findings. I don't know if similar changes were issued in other countries or if the US was CT scan happy because we have for profit medicine?
I had an ENT try to arm twist me into getting a CT scan when I went in to get some allergy meds for hayfever. They just got the machine, only backed off when they realized my deductible hadn't been met for the year because I made them check my insurance.
by lillymunster 8/22/2011 1:54:50 AM

hi dean
by lillymunster 8/22/2011 2:01:44 AM

@ elaine.. is there enough information in the writing I did to post?
by dean 8/22/2011 2:14:38 AM

@ lilly oops
by dean 8/22/2011 2:15:37 AM

@dean I think so did you pick it up @Lillymunster it was excellent
by elainekirk 8/22/2011 2:15:40 AM

I wanted to include the graph showing..
by dean 8/22/2011 2:15:49 AM

@AustralianCannonball based on? The most I found so far admitted decades for some areas. Did you find something new?
by lillymunster 8/22/2011 2:18:58 AM

@ lilly and elaine,, I did want to clarify, based on RBeaners earlier comments that any study which can show that lower doses are not as severe from the standpoint of cancers is welcomed and encouraged but, not for the purpose of supporting and increase of limits currently in place.
by dean 8/22/2011 2:19:27 AM

@dean I posted it earlier today. If you can repost the graph I can go add it in.
by lillymunster 8/22/2011 2:19:30 AM

ok @ lilly
by dean 8/22/2011 2:19:42 AM


graph showing the different models for radiation and cancer risk
by dean 8/22/2011 2:21:05 AM

Alternative assumptions for the extrapolation of the cancer risk vs. radiation dose to low-dose levels, given a known risk at a high dose: supra-linearity (A), linear (B), linear-quadratic (C) and hormesis (D).
by dean 8/22/2011 2:21:47 AM

@AustralianCannonball what article?
by lillymunster 8/22/2011 2:21:49 AM

@AustralianCannonball they said decades, not never go home. Though I think the admission of never is coming, the article and quotes from officials have yet to admit it.
by lillymunster 8/22/2011 2:24:07 AM

I've had a long day.. I must rest.. be back in a few hours..
by dean 8/22/2011 2:25:59 AM

@RadioGuy exactly. While these people sat in shelters thinking they could go home soon. I posted an article last week. One of the JP papers asked people in the evac center when or if they thought they would go home. Only a small percentage thought they would never go home. It has been painfully obvious that the town 3km from the plant is probably a lost cause as soon as the reactors blew up.
by lillymunster 8/22/2011 2:27:55 AM

@RadioGuy I am taking bets on a Tues admission or next Monday.
by lillymunster 8/22/2011 2:28:29 AM

@AustralianCannonball could you link to the article you found instead of making people hop through multiple links?
by lillymunster 8/22/2011 2:29:31 AM