
@Peter Melzer I am really interested to see if there is anything elevated around there. One of the local physics professors took readings back in the 90's and supposedly found unusually elevated levels.
@all - out of the office for a bit.
by lillymunster 8/23/2011 4:19:36 PM

@lillymunster
www.charity-commission.gov.uk the quote is from the accounts they filed last year with the English Charity Commission in $'s which the charity commission converted 1:1 to £'s..... very strange carry on you will also find funding sources there.
.
And from another doc
The activities of ICRP are financed mainly by voluntary contributions from national and international
bodies with an interest in radiological protection. Some additional funds accrue from royalties on ICRP
Publications. Members’ institutions also provide financial support to ICRP by making the members time
available without charge and, in many cases, contributing to their costs of attending meetings.
ICRP works closely with its sister Commission, ICRU, and has relationship with many other bodies, e.g.
within the United Nations structure, with IAEA, ILO, PAHO, UNEP, UNSCEAR, and WHO; other bodies
include IEC, ISO, OECD/NEA, and IRPA. The relationships imply exchange of information; it must be stressed
that ICRP and the various bodies mentioned are completely independent of each other.
www.irpa.netby elainekirk 8/23/2011 4:22:44 PM

How are effects of radiation classified?
There are two basic categories of the biological effects that may be observed in irradiated
persons. These are 1) due largely to cell killing (deterministic) and 2 mutations which may result in
cancer and hereditary effects (stochastic or probabilistic ). Effects due to cell killing (such as skin
necrosis) have a practical threshold dose below which the effect is not evident but in general when the
effect is present its severity increases with the radiation dose. The threshold dose is not an absolute
number and vary somewhat by individual. Effects due to mutations (such as cancer) have a
probability of occurrence that increases with dose, it is currently judged that there is not a threshold
below which the effect will not occur and finally the severity of the effects is independent of the dose.
Thus a cancer caused by a small amount of radiation can be just as malignant as one caused by a
high dose
www.icrp.orgby elainekirk 8/23/2011 4:48:29 PM

QUOTE - "THIS SHOULD NOT BE INTERPRETED AS THE PRESENCE OF A DOSE THRESHOLD"
b. At the lower end of the curve, below ~ 100-200 mGy, any potential effect
cannot be measured easily because statistical errors of the observations due to the
large amount of spontaneous cancer and the impact of confounding factors. This should 5
not be interpreted as the presence of a dose threshold. It is assumed that at the low
doses (< 0.2 Gy), probability of the effect (frequency) increases most likely
proportionally with the dose.
c. There is always a spontaneous frequency of the effect (mutations, cancer) in nonirradiated populations (F0
in Fig 2), which cannot be differentiated qualitatively from that
induced by radiation. In fact, mutations or cancers induced by irradiation have the same
morphological, biochemical, and clinical etc. characteristics as the cases occurring in nonirradiated individual
www.icrp.orgby elainekirk 8/23/2011 4:57:56 PM

@Majj OOO that looks interesting going to read ....
by elainekirk 8/23/2011 5:00:22 PM

Opposition parties to resume grilling Maehara over donation issueTOKYO, Aug. 23, Kyodo
Opposition lawmakers said Tuesday they are ready to grill former Foreign Minister Seiji Maehara over his acceptance of political donations from a foreign national following his announcement that he will run in the ruling Democratic Party of Japan's presidential election.
Maehara ''has yet to fulfill accountability'' for the donation issue, said Nobuteru Ishihara, secretary general of the Liberal Democratic Party.
Japan's Political Funds Control Law bans contributions from foreign individuals to prevent domestic politics from being influenced by foreign countries.
english.kyodonews.jp by Edano 8/23/2011 5:42:34 PM

no, it was not a US donation and not french, only korean, and not high either.
by Edano 8/23/2011 5:48:24 PM

by Edano 8/23/2011 5:50:51 PM

Tuesday August 23 2011, 17:51:03 UTC 3 minutes ago Virginia 5.8 6.0 Detail
Tuesday August 23 2011, 17:51:03 UTC 3 minutes ago Virginia 5.8 6.0 Detail
quakes.globalincidentmap.comby Edano 8/23/2011 5:55:10 PM

close to d.c.
by Edano 8/23/2011 5:56:03 PM

not really an earthquake zone (?) i guess they have plenty of nukes around.
by Edano 8/23/2011 6:00:00 PM

Holy cats! Ian Goddard just emailed me they had a quake in Maryland
by lillymunster 8/23/2011 6:01:49 PM

"Noda and Maehara agree on most policies—fiscal discipline, a gradual fade-out of nuclear power, the need for close collaboration with the opposition, a strong U.S.-Japan alliance—they differ on tax policy."
online.wsj.com finally i found a statement on nuke energy.
by Edano 8/23/2011 6:02:40 PM

Ian said it was pretty intense in MD
by lillymunster 8/23/2011 6:05:07 PM

Hurricane barreling up the east coast, a big quake in DC. Yet the NRC says a Fuku type disaster couldn't happen in the US.
by lillymunster 8/23/2011 6:06:23 PM

Reuters reporting they felt it at Times Square in NYC pretty intensely
by lillymunster 8/23/2011 6:07:07 PM

doesn't peter live at epicentre ?
by Edano 8/23/2011 6:07:12 PM

Felt it in Tennessee and N. Carolina according to local media here
by lillymunster 8/23/2011 6:09:07 PM

@Cryptococcus a different quake?
by lillymunster 8/23/2011 6:09:28 PM

usgs is down (more or less).
by Edano 8/23/2011 6:17:28 PM

So if it reverberated up the coast would the shake be enough to scram Indian Point? There are lots of other NPPs in that region
by lillymunster 8/23/2011 6:19:50 PM

Is there anywhere that puts scram or operating data live for the NPP so we don't have to wait days for an event report?
by lillymunster 8/23/2011 6:20:50 PM