
One more quote from the CT study: "The most recent study on the risks of exposure to low levels of radiation is further proof that concerns over CT scanning doses can be taken seriously."
by lillymunster 8/22/2011 5:12:26 PM

@Peter, trying to understand the Gy to Sv ratio on a CT scan. The chart I have mentions that beta and gamma convert to Sv at a 1:1 conversion but alpha converts from Gy to Sv at a different ratio. Any idea how I could convert that CT scan dose expressed in Gy to a Sv dose people can understand easier?
by lillymunster 8/22/2011 5:28:46 PM

@Peter Melzer So if it did a 1:1 conversion of the dose from a CT to a general Sv dose amount it would be a generally correct conversion?
by lillymunster 8/22/2011 5:52:33 PM

@Peter Melzer what is kappaB
by elainekirk 8/22/2011 6:02:04 PM

@elainekirk you really wanna know ?
en.wikipedia.orgby Edano 8/22/2011 6:06:13 PM

@Edano @Peter Melzer ty :O
by elainekirk 8/22/2011 6:17:51 PM

I havent started reading yet but think I am not knowledgable enough to assess .....I am gonna look anyway ...
sciencelinks.jpAbstract;Under the framework of the International Consortium for Medical Care of Hibakusha and Radiation Life Science (Nagasaki University 21st Century COE Program) and bearing in mind the unique history and responsibility of Nagasaki University, several projects on radiation emergency preparedness are in progress. The critical accident in Tokaimura, Japan in 1999 made us realize that nuclear emergencies happen any-where radionuclides exist. In fact, nuclear accidents possibly take place in factories, research facilities, hospital and wherever radioactive materialism are in transit. Therefore, it is necessary to establish an effective preparedness network system for potential radiation emergency that may occur in Nagasaki and nearby prefectures and to cooperate with other Japanese and worldwide networks. (author abst.)
by elainekirk 8/22/2011 6:27:42 PM

@joniver for dumping if you scroll to my worker tweets you will see they are deforesting to create dump holes the issue of groundwater doesnt seem to have been considered
by elainekirk 8/22/2011 6:29:49 PM

@joniver there were mentions of growing biofuels in the area since they can't grow food. I don't know if radiation would tag along with the part of the plant used for fuel and become a problem during processing or use in a vehicle?
by lillymunster 8/22/2011 6:34:58 PM

@joniver it sounds like it already is methinks they will be competing with tepco I wonder if the people know their forests are being razed and the land (plus by default all land seaward of it) turned i
nto a nuclear wasteland
by elainekirk 8/22/2011 6:36:04 PM

Yamashitaism #54635786876536788990...recurring
.
Our results suggest that management of thyroid screening for schoolchildren at ordinary times may be beneficial for monitoring the adverse effects of radioactive iodine from the standpoint of future prospective study.
.
sciencelinks.jpby elainekirk 8/22/2011 6:37:17 PM

Anybody seen any general thyroid screening beyond the 14 children per area they screened to base their guestimates of the other xxx0000's
by elainekirk 8/22/2011 6:39:20 PM


@joniver nothing in deep detail but there is a map of thyroid doses from the Nevada bomb tests by area on this wiki page. It is on the right down towards the bottom en.wikipedia.org
upload.wikimedia.org

This study has a ranking list of state by state thyroid cancer levels
www.radiation.orgby lillymunster 8/22/2011 6:53:53 PM

@RadioGuy Idaho and Montana were frequently downwind of Hanford. Idaho has a couple of nuclear facilities but I am not very familiar with the extent of the work or exposures from that. They may have also been in that ring of fallout from the Nevada bomb tests. I have not seen a solid conclusive single source cited as a cause.
by lillymunster 8/22/2011 6:58:11 PM

@RadioGuy west to east weather. I did see a mention in the Hanford research that Utah and Montana got Hanford fallout but it didn't seem to make it to Wyoming and SD in detectable amounts that could be connected.
by lillymunster 8/22/2011 6:59:55 PM

@RadioGuy If you look at the exposures map it makes a big ring out from Nevada in a NE direction. I have not found any data on this but there is a noticeable ring on the exposure map.
by lillymunster 8/22/2011 7:01:21 PM

@joniver other thyroid disorders known to be caused by radiation exposure like hyper/hypo thyroidism, Graves disease, Hashimoto's disease, nodules, non cancerous tumors etc. are never included and are a significant portion of the health outcomes. It is more concerning because having thyroid disorders at a young age can hurt development and cognitive function.
by lillymunster 8/22/2011 7:10:18 PM

@RadioGuy @lillymunster @joniver
www.soyonlineservice.co.nz hth
by elainekirk 8/22/2011 7:11:12 PM

Non cancerous thyroid disease has become a really controversial area of medicine. There is one set of clinical practice that is very limiting in diagnosis and treatment but another set of researchers and doctors who treat and diagnose differently and view bloodwork and treatment differently. Then there is some junk science out on the fringe. It makes it hard for people trying to get proper treatment to navigate and find what works for them. There is one school of thought that many go undiagnosed because they suffer but their bloodwork doesn't fit the more conservative diagnostic standards. I ended up with huge non-cancerous tumors and so sick I couldn't walk across a room before they figured out I had a thyroid problem. It kept being missed.
by lillymunster 8/22/2011 7:17:47 PM

@joniver to a certain extent soy does play a role. I am not familiar with the info on that website. But people with hypothyroidism or hashimotos are sometimes told to modify their iodine intake and avoid things like soy, seaweed, walnuts and raw spinach because in large doses it can impact your thyroid blood levels.
by lillymunster 8/22/2011 7:19:42 PM