
First thing I catch in the conference call is that they have to use trained staff, not a summer intern to do walkdowns
by lillymunster 12/14/2011 4:04:34 PM

I am going to head any posts related to the Fukushima TECHNICAL meeting with "Tech"
TECH: can't inspect many areas while plants are running. How will this impact new inspections and time tables.
by lillymunster 12/14/2011 4:09:44 PM

@MaryW was that in the CSPAN hearing?
by lillymunster 12/14/2011 4:10:13 PM

TECH: concerns about unexpected flood infiltration such as from switchyard into the NPP or other access points not assumed are prone to water.
by lillymunster 12/14/2011 4:12:18 PM

@MaryW by who?
by lillymunster 12/14/2011 4:14:57 PM

TECH: flood risk accessment should be basic and down to site specific looking for risk unique to each site.
by lillymunster 12/14/2011 4:22:46 PM

TECH: Looking at NOAA data, potential of multiple dam failures, landslides etc. how that can impact a reactor site. Any dam failure will cause erosion and should be included. Failure of on site water structures like a pond and how those structures could fail and impact on a plant
by lillymunster 12/14/2011 4:33:48 PM

TECH: storm surge and wave action of storms should be looked at. Tsunami, use various model programs to determine risk based on events that can cause a tsunami.
by lillymunster 12/14/2011 4:35:40 PM

TECH: downstream back up can cause flooding upstream. Cooling ponds can freeze up and cause flood issues.
by lillymunster 12/14/2011 4:38:10 PM

TECH: water diversion to a site, can it cause natural stream or river to erode plant area, direct flooding towards the plant. Are flooding mechanisms higher elevation, may require more flood protection.
by lillymunster 12/14/2011 4:40:06 PM

@M.I.A. has anyone brought up politicians ties to nuke industry or specific commissioners ties and former relationships with nuke industry?
by lillymunster 12/14/2011 4:46:32 PM

Phone meeting is repeatedly asking for public questions on sections being talked about from phones and people at meeting. This is stark contrast from the BWR petition meeting a few months ago.
by lillymunster 12/14/2011 4:49:21 PM

@M.I.A. can you tell if Franken (MN) is in the meeting
by lillymunster 12/14/2011 4:53:47 PM

TECH: questions about how new tsunami risk will be calculated. Turkey Point brought up as example plant. Now going on lunch break - considering another meeting in January to work more on these issues. Meeting today will restart after lunch
by lillymunster 12/14/2011 4:55:57 PM

@M.I.A. Kucinish is Ohio
by lillymunster 12/14/2011 4:56:15 PM

@M.I.A. I think Markeley is there? He's knows who is who on NRC and who has industry ties
by lillymunster 12/14/2011 4:57:20 PM

TECH: they called lunch but are still discussing
by lillymunster 12/14/2011 4:59:57 PM

TECH: convened for 1 hour. I will reconnect then and continue posting anything of interest
by lillymunster 12/14/2011 5:05:52 PM

Magwood is the guy who used to work for TEPCO and is the instigator of much of this.
by lillymunster 12/14/2011 5:13:10 PM

wow the congressman from Idaho is a dick.
by lillymunster 12/14/2011 5:14:25 PM

He is grilling Jaczko over who is "more passionate" this is junior high school behavior.
by lillymunster 12/14/2011 5:15:19 PM

@M.I.A. ironic isn't it.
by lillymunster 12/14/2011 5:19:41 PM

Congressman from Maryland calling this a distraction
by lillymunster 12/14/2011 5:28:35 PM

This sounds like scolding a bunch of kids having a fight.
by lillymunster 12/14/2011 5:32:10 PM