Japan Earthquake

Japan Earthquake | Page 2827

ICRP: "In reference to 100 mSv exposure is life, health effects or not really?"
Fukushima, including the threat of radioactivity in the face of reality that people across the country.
Country "has no immediate effect on the body," and just repeat.
And that is its cornerstone, ICRP (International Commission on Radiological Protection =) recommendations. www.nhk.or.jp www.nhk.or.jp
by MaryW 12/31/2011 3:07:47 AM

ICRP underestimated the low dose symptom risk by 85%. fukushima-diary.com December 30, 2011 (Friday) (Translated)
"Follow international standards undermined _ _ low dose exposure! File truth". Well, that was broadcast on NHK on December 28 " track __ __ low dose exposure undermined international standards? file truth "is seen, the ICRP safety standards determined by a deliberate political result and safety the fact that there have come up with serious health problems to residents and that low-dose exposure, that is, in fact safety standards had been reported to be unsafe at all. The ICRP... it had a safety boost is being ignored evidence, and say they determined to promote nuclear power as low as possible. Safety standards determined by the ICRP, he have come from serious damage to the population especially children, ICRP is no exaggeration to say I do not think worked the crime. fujifujinovember.cocolog-nifty.com fujifujinovember.cocolog-nifty.com
by MaryW 12/31/2011 3:18:49 AM

ICRP underestimated the low dose symptom risk by 85% fukushima-diary.com "In reference to 100 mSv exposure is life, health effects or not really?"
Fukushima, including the threat of radioactivity in the face of reality that people across the country.
Country "has no immediate effect on the body," and just repeat.
And that is its cornerstone, ICRP (International Commission on Radiological Protection =) recommendations. www.nhk.or.jp www.nhk.or.jp (translated)
by MaryW 12/31/2011 3:21:34 AM

@Edano , if they were let us say 20 meters from the cars and the dose rate is indeed indicated in microSv/h, the dose at the cars should have been about 12 milliSv/h. That is a lot.
by Peter 12/31/2011 3:24:29 AM

ICRP (Amendment) late 1980, the ICRP "political decision" in fact emerged NHK track was actually cut in half the risk of exposure to cancer? Truth Files "swing low dose exposure with international standards" ICRP underestimated the low dose symptom risk by 85% fukushima-diary.com (Source is translated) togetter.com translate.google.com
by MaryW 12/31/2011 3:28:17 AM

@Peter yes, that's why i wondered if they cannot block it better or if they just don't want to.
by Edano 12/31/2011 3:28:56 AM

@Peter "Restrisiko" you remember that crucial word ?
by Edano 12/31/2011 3:30:41 AM

@Edano, way back to the train, I suspect that level of emissions is considered acceptable.
by Ian 12/31/2011 4:07:12 AM

@MaryW, I get the impression from photos of the show that they really tear apart the ICRP.
by Ian 12/31/2011 4:10:20 AM

It looks like they're saying the DDREF the ICRP included into risk modeling, and that the National Academy of Sciences adopted as well, is bunk. I was aware of that in my research for my video www.youtube.com and it probably explains why even the NAS risk model seems to underestimate risk.
by Ian 12/31/2011 4:14:13 AM

This is a study that goes against the ICRP's DDREF:

oem.bmj.com

"Current estimates of cancer risks from LDRMD
exposures are mainly based on risk coefficients
derived from the Japanese atomic bomb survivors,
that is, from persons with acute, high-dose
exposures, which are then combined with a ‘‘dose
and dose-rate effectiveness factor’’ (DDREF).(2,3)
Values for DDREF have mainly been deduced from
experiments with laboratory animals and from
radiobiological measurements. Specifically, the
International Commission on Radiological
Protection (ICRP) derived estimates of the excess
cancer risk after low-dose exposures and after
exposures with higher doses but low-dose rates by
reducing the corresponding risk value for the
atomic bomb survivors by a DDREF of 2.0.(2) The
BEIR VII Committee of the US National Research
Council used a DDREF of 1.5.(3) […]

The ICRP and BEIR VII base their DDREFs mainly on
radiobiological results including animal data, which, in their
majority, suggest a characteristically low risk for low-dose-rate
exposures. It remains an open question as to why this
characteristic is apparently not reflected in the human
epidemiological data."
by Ian 12/31/2011 4:22:08 AM

<iframe frameborder="0" width="480" height="273" src="http://www.dailymotion.com/embed/video/xnb9h8"></iframe><br />低線量被ばく_揺らぐ国際基準_追跡！真相ﾌｧｲﾙ by gomizeromirai
by MaryW 12/31/2011 4:25:11 AM

@Ian Did you watch the video here? Not in english, but still informative. ICRP underestimated the low dose symptom risk by 85%
Posted by Mochizuki on December 30th, 2011 · fukushima-diary.com Would be great if google could translate voice-recognition :) Some day
by MaryW 12/31/2011 4:29:14 AM

I was unable to transport video to here
by MaryW 12/31/2011 4:29:49 AM

Forgot to mention, there are portions of the ICRP video in english.
by MaryW 12/31/2011 4:32:48 AM

@MaryW this is highly interesting. i always was suspicious against the icrp. i think they are just an iaea subcontractor.
#
by Edano 12/31/2011 4:33:47 AM

is it this one ???
by Edano 12/31/2011 4:37:02 AM

@Edano there is an embedded code for the video, but I had no luck. Here's the link, it the video that's 27.56 minutes www.dailymotion.com (Actually a few look good
by MaryW 12/31/2011 4:37:14 AM

I found it interesting when they say, its not only the amount of radiation in the air, it also is the digested amount
by MaryW 12/31/2011 4:40:04 AM

@MaryW the one i embedded is not the right one ?
by Edano 12/31/2011 4:40:05 AM

the last one you posted is correct
by MaryW 12/31/2011 4:41:22 AM

Year's last search made for victims. December 31.2011. FUKUSHIMA--About 180 police officers and firefighters have scoured the coastline of Fukushima Prefecture in the year's last intensive search for victims of the March 11 earthquake and tsunami.
National Police Agency data showed 218 people from the prefecture remained missing as of Thursday. www.yomiuri.co.jp
by MaryW 12/31/2011 4:51:33 AM

Expert groups to probe Fukushima n-plant disaster again
| Dec 31, 2011, 09.31AM IST Tokyo: Four groups of independent experts will conduct another probe into the nuclear disaster at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant, the NHK TV channel said. ...The first report, released Tuesday, criticised people who have been involved in nuclear disaster response and those in charge of managing and operating the nuclear power plant for "lacking the whole-picture viewpoint in nuclear disaster preparedness." timesofindia.indiatimes.com
by MaryW 12/31/2011 4:54:34 AM

@Edano, yes, that's the video of the NHK program!
by Ian 12/31/2011 5:01:41 AM

Quake rattles New Zealand's Christchurch: USGS
Fri Dec 30, 2011 8:37pm EST An earthquake with a magnitude of 5.3 struck close to the New Zealand city of Christchurch on Saturday, the U.S. Geological Survey reported, but there were no immediate reports of damage or casualties.
ca.reuters.com
by MaryW 12/31/2011 5:02:59 AM

@MaryW, do you understand Japanese, or is there translation?
by Ian 12/31/2011 5:04:12 AM

@Edano Video could be presenting the current situation. It sounds like a repeat of what we've been hearing all along.
by MaryW 12/31/2011 5:04:23 AM

This guy goes to the same testing stations seen in the NHK program: www.youtube.com
by Ian 12/31/2011 5:06:02 AM

@Ian Watch the video Edano posted, has info in from the article posted in fukushima-Diary. It does have sections in it that are in english too, among other languages. Its easy to follow.(I think)
by MaryW 12/31/2011 5:06:38 AM

Here's another NHK program, this one on "the reality of internal exposure" : www.dailymotion.com
by Ian 12/31/2011 5:09:15 AM

radiation SOIL / APPLE (1556Bq/kg high contermination) "Yokohama Tokyo" Fukushima fallout. Uploaded by harisenbon7777777 on Dec 22, 2011
I will provide several videos over the next weeks and months
radiation check food, drinks, soil (Tokyo/Yokohama/Chiba)
by MaryW 12/31/2011 5:09:59 AM

@MaryW, okay, I'll keep it rolling.
by Ian 12/31/2011 5:10:31 AM

@Ian I cannot post the dailymotion videos, Edano has luck with those, not me :)
by MaryW 12/31/2011 5:13:40 AM

@MaryW, I know I saw that video on youtube a few days ago, but can't find it now. Trying to jump around on the DailyMotion videos triggers the ad each time.
by Ian 12/31/2011 5:15:55 AM

I can't find what I'm looking for either :) Off to rest time.
by MaryW 12/31/2011 5:19:23 AM

bump
by Edano 12/31/2011 1:02:13 PM

@Edano , Happy 2012 with less Restrisiko, :)
by Peter 12/31/2011 2:29:43 PM

Morning and possibly happy new year depending on where you are :-)
by lillymunster 12/31/2011 2:46:22 PM

Ian if you stop by I think I have an extraction tool that can pull out a dailymotion video and download it. I'm not totally sure what you were after with it and if that would help.
by lillymunster 12/31/2011 2:47:47 PM

GSDF commander says he thought Japan done for as he faced Fukushima nuke crisis mdn.mainichi.jp
by lillymunster 12/31/2011 3:15:29 PM

Does anyone know who runs the Washington Times? They have run another blatantly pro nuclear news piece. I wonder who owns the paper...
by lillymunster 12/31/2011 3:16:06 PM

RE: Washington Times- On November 2, 2010, Sun Myung Moon and a group of former Times editors purchased the paper from News World.[5] en.wikipedia.org
by M.I.A. 12/31/2011 3:21:44 PM

It seems Moon bought it from his own Unification Church? And the Unification church (News World Communication) owns UPI!
by M.I.A. 12/31/2011 3:25:39 PM

MIA, was reading the wiki article since the paper didn't have anything clear. Man that makes my head hurt. They have lots of objectivity and editorial controversy so the pro nuke screeds seem to now make sense...
by lillymunster 12/31/2011 3:26:30 PM