Japan Earthquake | Page 996
@marie rich do you mean all the discussion about blow out panels etc? I should have a picture ready in a few minutes. If this is actually happening then you have your 8 days and it is #4.by Nancy 5/6/2011 2:12:21 AM- @elainekirk 4 is going to spew fresh rods all over when it goes. It is sinking SFP end first.by Nancy 5/6/2011 2:12:52 AM
I can't remember fitterby dean 5/6/2011 2:13:00 AM
@Nancy I have just been reading about 27 pages on the panels, until i stoped to look at that post...by fitter 5/6/2011 2:13:32 AM
which will make #3 at least a no go zone then 3 will blow and game over ?by elainekirk 5/6/2011 2:13:40 AM
@Nancy post 5938 5939 discuss leaning appearance of unitby marie rich 5/6/2011 2:14:07 AM- @dean if you come across it again save me the address, i tryied to copy it here but it would not let me,(human error)by fitter 5/6/2011 2:14:34 AM
- on the new camera. sorryby marie rich 5/6/2011 2:14:36 AM
- ok fitterby dean 5/6/2011 2:15:48 AM
- @marie rich honestly the pics from the new camara make look like a War zone.. not reactors that are suposst to be "stable"by fitter 5/6/2011 2:15:57 AM
- @dean what do they me by "enbed"by fitter 5/6/2011 2:16:32 AM
- @dean on the computor sorryby fitter 5/6/2011 2:16:53 AM
- by dean 5/6/2011 2:17:02 AM
So more water in #4 SFP = crash and burn, less water = rod cookoff.. some choicesby WolfDK 5/6/2011 2:17:20 AM- fitter.. put your cursor over the video and a little "EDIT" will show up below.. click that and then cut and paste the URL addresss....by dean 5/6/2011 2:17:47 AM
- fitter. can you copy and paste how that's used? "enbed"by dean 5/6/2011 2:18:28 AM
@marie rich I just saw that. Nancy's clone :) One person drew some lines and another said that it could be accounted for. The optics of being 13 km away was the best explanation.by Jim Carver 5/6/2011 2:18:35 AM- @dean when i did that it say i cant save becauce of the charicters in the urlby fitter 5/6/2011 2:18:53 AM
- @Jim Carver idho, i officially stink at the picture stuff ;-)by marie rich 5/6/2011 2:19:37 AM
Here's the picture, if you click the link you will get a much larger version. 4 is at an angle, everything else is vertical www.houseoffoust.com
by Nancy via Houseoffoust 5/6/2011 2:19:37 AM- @jim could you make any sence out of the e-mail post...by fitter 5/6/2011 2:20:36 AM
- @Nancy Looks right to me. but see post below :0by marie rich 5/6/2011 2:20:37 AM
- @Nancy Oh you had already done that. What do you think about the 'pin cushion effect'?by Jim Carver 5/6/2011 2:20:56 AM
- @dean I don't think the US wants to do much radiation monitoring, because I think they know we have more leaks HERE than they want to find...by fitter 5/6/2011 2:22:37 AM
- @fitter I'd like to see the whole translation of the original post. Haven't done that yet. Too busy seeing what you guys are doing i guess.by Jim Carver 5/6/2011 2:22:41 AM
- I'm going...by Jim Carver 5/6/2011 2:23:21 AM
- @Nancy Maybe you should draw one more line on the last tower. If I understood, one part of the argument against it leaning was that we are seeing a part of a telephoto shot, with the 'center' towards the right side.by marie rich 5/6/2011 2:24:00 AM
- I am going to try to sleep no doubt the image of #4 will give me nightmaresby elainekirk 5/6/2011 2:24:05 AM
- ELAINE.... now you will be ok .. you need some restby dean 5/6/2011 2:24:37 AM
- @elainekirk Goodnight. I hope whoever you want to win, wins!by marie rich 5/6/2011 2:24:53 AM
- fitter.. we need to link to the NRC and then find out what the acceptable leak rate is at the commercial plants..by dean 5/6/2011 2:25:16 AM
- Good mite all, my computor is really pisssssssing me off !!!! going to read about blowout panels... LOVE paper Niteby fitter 5/6/2011 2:25:21 AM
- rest well fitterby dean 5/6/2011 2:25:40 AM
- @fitter Night.by marie rich 5/6/2011 2:25:47 AM
- nancy.. you mean the #4 building is leaningby dean 5/6/2011 2:25:53 AM
There was talk a while ago about all the water collecting underground might threaten the stability of the whole plant site. Add aftershocks to the mix, and I could see why the buildings could collapse.by Bobby1 5/6/2011 2:26:14 AM- The original post shows three ommissions and no sign of what was said.by Jim Carver 5/6/2011 2:26:36 AM
@elainekirk good night and thanksby bo 5/6/2011 2:26:48 AM- @dean I would garenteee you that the readings here would be high, Form the millitary... bobboy (I think had something from charlotte va and it was high.. but i realy did not understand it and he was gone when i read itby fitter 5/6/2011 2:27:11 AM
- @dean Yes it is leaning over to the right.by Nancy 5/6/2011 2:27:20 AM
- @bo see ya later!by Jim Carver 5/6/2011 2:27:23 AM
- @Jim Carver was saying g'bye to elainekirk, I am still here and rivetedby bo 5/6/2011 2:27:53 AM
- @bo Oh, sorry, jumping around too much.by Jim Carver 5/6/2011 2:28:29 AM
- @Nancy that would cause a "major release????by fitter 5/6/2011 2:28:44 AM
- nite allby fitter 5/6/2011 2:29:04 AM
Japan Earthquake | Page 996
- Who's Blogging
-
hudebnik
alblee
UKVal
Jonathan Keebler
Oliver (ScribbleLive)
kaykodh
Markfm
Angie
Mid Valley
Matt (ScribbleLive)
George Gibb- elainekirk
PKelley
lillymunster
dean
bo
Edano
Deb- Pedro Jesus
IanGoddard