Japan Earthquake | Page 1005

  • I believe forever is intended. www3.nhk.or.jp
    by Markfm 5/6/2011 4:36:07 PM

  • I think @edano that they know so much about how fuku was overwhelmed and it has become obvious that the whole build of those reactors and housing are fatally flawed and cannot withstand anything.
    by elainekirk 5/6/2011 4:36:21 PM

  • sound like the beginning of a new aera. i hope so.
    by Edano 5/6/2011 4:37:11 PM

  • They have so many npp's in Japan there must be othher mk1's there ? there really aren't any safe area's are there
    by elainekirk 5/6/2011 4:37:33 PM

  • but why "hastily" if it is within 30 years ? are there predictions for a sooner quake ? it is quite surprising.
    by Edano 5/6/2011 4:40:07 PM

  • don't tell me the 87% chance is something new. kan knew that before.
    by Edano 5/6/2011 4:41:13 PM

  • Hamaoka #5 is an advanced BWR, just went online in 2005. Taking the 3 reactors offline leaves another hole in available supply -- 4500 MW.
    by Markfm 5/6/2011 4:41:48 PM

  • This may work per the bureaucratic definition of "hastily" -- in other words, a couple of years before anything actually shuts down, then the mothballing period commences.
    by Markfm edited by Markfm 5/6/2011 4:43:37 PM

  • @elainekirk en.wikipedia.org
    by Jocke_Jensen 5/6/2011 4:43:54 PM

  • So, I guess that decision by GoJ will finally (even a cat runs out of lives) end the "incident"-plagued Tokai Nuclear Fuel Works?
    by radioguy 5/6/2011 4:46:55 PM

  • @Nancy, were you looking for my email or website?
    by bo 5/6/2011 4:49:10 PM

  • @bo you mentioned something about having a website with some related content? Maybe I read it wrong?
    by Nancy 5/6/2011 4:49:43 PM


  • @jocke thank you
    by elainekirk 5/6/2011 4:50:16 PM

  • Radiation levels in the unit 2 torus are over double from two days ago falloutphilippines.blogspot.com
    by Bobby1 5/6/2011 4:51:48 PM

  • @Nancy my website is about my own academic work, which is about social and cultural issues related to preparations for nuclear war in the 50s and 60s, and also about hibakusha communities that were exposed to radiation from nuclear testing, not about Fukushima at all, but happy to post the website if you like
    by bo 5/6/2011 4:52:08 PM

  • Tsuruga #1
    Matsue #1
    Omaezaki #1


    Seems to be the only ones in Japan beside Fukushima 1-5 with mark 1 containment
    by Jocke_Jensen 5/6/2011 4:53:13 PM

  • Mark 1 : Shimane Nuclear Power Plant #1, Tsuruga Nuclear Power Plant
    Mark 2 : -
    Mark 3 : Hamaoka Nuclear Power Plant #3+4, Shimane Nuclear Power Plant #2
    by Edano 5/6/2011 4:55:32 PM

  • by Edano 5/6/2011 4:56:20 PM

  • @Radioguy -- What decision effects Tokai?
    by Markfm edited by Markfm 5/6/2011 4:56:49 PM

  • @bo I thought it was referencing something for here. prob don't need it but sounds interesting. :-)
    by Nancy 5/6/2011 4:56:56 PM

  • @Markfm Apparently, this has struck deeply enough into the Japanese thought-structure that even the advanced reactors are suddenly considered a threat. That says something about what their review process is telling them. It also says worlds about their ability to learn and adapt, possibly even decisively, even if it entails large-scale difficult decisions.

    The US, on the exact other hand, couldn't wait to pay off BP and shuffle the whole thing under the rug so it "doesn't hurt business." (Poor business.) Total oil legislation passed by the US Congress since Deepwater Horizon? Zero.

    We made our coastal waters safe for business. Japan's history of adaptation dwarfs ours. I think they can look beyond business and try to save save their people.
    by radioguy 5/6/2011 4:57:12 PM

  • @Markfm If they're closing reactors in Tokai, for earthquake reasons, wouldn't that seem to extend to the reactor at Tokai? (They have one, don't they?)
    by radioguy 5/6/2011 4:58:38 PM

  • translate.google.com
    After being relatively quiet in recent weeks in Iceland there now shaking the earth again reinforced. Swarm of earthquakes occurred in the Northeast today Askja. After all, there were four earthquakes beneath the glacier subglacial volcano Katla Myrdalsjökull with. These earthquakes are not to be regarded as direct signs of impending volcanic eruptions, but they are evidence of the tectonic and magmatic activity of the***Mid-Atlantic Ridge.***
    by elainekirk 5/6/2011 4:59:44 PM

  • (As if that wasn't confusing enough... the Tokai Fuel Works. I don't recall seeing it specified anywhere, but I've always assumed they must have a reactor on site for that work.)
    by radioguy 5/6/2011 5:02:14 PM

  • @radioguy : no. tokai is a region west of tokyo, on the west coast, while tokai npp is located on the east coast north of tokyo. it's only the same name, but different regions.
    by Edano 5/6/2011 5:02:26 PM

  • @Edano Thank you.
    by radioguy 5/6/2011 5:02:47 PM

  • Got it.
    by radioguy 5/6/2011 5:02:57 PM

  • Location map of Japanese nuclear facilities calls out Tokai Works reprocessing facility on the East coast (but northeast of Tokyo, as opposed to Hamaoka being southwest of it): www2.jnes.go.jp
    by Markfm 5/6/2011 5:07:12 PM

  • @radioguy : confusing enough, i looked it up in wikipedia:
    1. Tokai region: south of Tokyo on east coast, pref. Chubu, NPP Hamaoka
    2. Tokai city: north of Tokyo on east coast, pref. Ibaraki, NPP Tokai
    by Edano 5/6/2011 5:09:13 PM

  • Totally confusing :). I'm pretty comfortable that JNES map is correct -- multiple references to the Tokai reprocessing works being in Ibaraki prefecture.
    by Markfm 5/6/2011 5:10:42 PM

  • @elaine, if you run across something talking about the roof braces at Hamaoka can you let me know. There was a web page from Chubu talking about them and the retrofits and now I can't find that web page again.
    by Nancy 5/6/2011 5:11:45 PM

  • So, closing Hamaoka wouldn't directly affect Tokai -- far apart geographically. If it represents a real GOJ change of heart, super, but I expect Hamaoka is a sacrificial lamb, bad siting even for Japan (which has few good choices).
    by Markfm 5/6/2011 5:12:23 PM

  • @Markfm Oh well. That place has been closed since the 1999 disaster anyway. It was all completely decommissioned b6 2006. ;)
    by radioguy 5/6/2011 5:13:27 PM

  • @Markfm : hamaoka once was the biggest plant worldwide. the name is a symbol for progress to the japanese.
    by Edano 5/6/2011 5:15:07 PM

  • Look at the JNES map, though, and you'll see quite a few nuclear processing facilities, including along the coast to the southwest of Tokyo.
    by markfm 5/6/2011 5:15:09 PM

  • So closing it is a psychic blow to pride?
    by markfm 5/6/2011 5:15:33 PM

  • @markfm : it seems like a real change.
    by Edano 5/6/2011 5:16:25 PM

  • Interesting, thanks for the insight.
    by markfm 5/6/2011 5:16:42 PM

  • In search of a nuclear disposal site search.japantimes.co.jp Article on long term storage
    by markfm 5/6/2011 5:21:17 PM

  • Ahh, from an AP article on the other page, the Hamaoka shutdown is temporary, until they can implement new safety systems (recent post by Veen) "Trade Minister Banri Kaieda said the utility company should halt operating its nuclear reactors while implementing such safety measures.

    “Until the company completes safety steps, it is inevitable that it should stop operating nuclear reactors,” Kaieda said."
    by markfm 5/6/2011 5:25:01 PM

  • @All Of the 5 fueled reactors and 7 storage pools which do you believe are the most likely to melt down and become diluted enough for the nuclear fire to go out?
    by DonnerT 5/6/2011 5:27:13 PM

  • Fukushima Dayichi - a new grand plan (Russian) www.atominfo.ru
    by Bobby1 5/6/2011 5:34:11 PM

  • by Bobby1 via Atominfo.ru 5/6/2011 5:34:32 PM

  • @DonnerT 5 and 6 supposedly have not suffered significant damage. R4 is toast. The building looks like it might be leaning, and the SFP has been compromised since the beginning. It's probaly a race between getting additional support under it and another big quake knocking it down.
    by radioguy 5/6/2011 5:34:48 PM

  • Chubu Electric plans to stop Hamaoka nuclear power plant mdn.mainichi.jp Decent article, talks about gap fill supply from another electric company.
    by Markfm 5/6/2011 5:36:46 PM

Japan Earthquake | Page 1005

Who's Blogging
  • hudebnikhudebnik
  • albleealblee
  • UKValUKVal
  • Jonathan KeeblerJonathan Keebler
  • Oliver (ScribbleLive)Oliver (ScribbleLive)
  • kaykodhkaykodh
  • MarkfmMarkfm
  • AngieAngie
  • Mid ValleyMid Valley
  • Matt (ScribbleLive)Matt (ScribbleLive)
  • George GibbGeorge Gibb
  • elainekirkelainekirk
  • PKelleyPKelley
  • lillymunsterlillymunster
  • deandean
  • bobo
  • EdanoEdano
  • DebDeb
  • Pedro Jesus
  • IanGoddardIanGoddard