Japan Earthquake | Page 1097
at least a smaller version.by Edano 5/11/2011 10:43:54 AM
@Edano Do they? When I archive the pages, there's not any images saved unless I tell it to follow those links.by Jim 5/11/2011 10:45:36 AM
@Jocke thanks for that just readingby elainekirk 5/11/2011 10:46:51 AM- They also put some kind of mask over it and you have to use a filter to read it.by Jim 5/11/2011 10:47:27 AM
- by Edano 5/11/2011 10:47:53 AM
Ok, I'll look..by Jim 5/11/2011 10:48:57 AM
but it's size adjusted. not original.by Edano 5/11/2011 10:49:40 AM
How did you find? cuz when I looked at the code the only thing listed was your last post.by Jim 5/11/2011 10:55:00 AM
fot that address that is.by Jim 5/11/2011 10:55:20 AM
From @Jocke link re new leak
by elainekirk 5/11/2011 10:55:25 AM
I re pic
At around 12:30pm, May 11, 2011, employees who had been conducting
vertical shaft obstruction work, confirmed water flowing into the
pit* via power cable pipe lines.
Currently, together with investigating the possible leakage of water
including radioactive materials to the outside of the boundary, we have
taken samples of the water in the pit and the seawater in the intake
canal of Unit 3, and analyses are underway at Fukushima Daini Nuclear
Power Station.
We will conduct water stoppage measures in the pit.
In addition, we have been orally instructed by the Nuclear and Industrial
Safety Agent (NISA) as follows:
-To confirm an impact to the ocean
-To immediately conduct water stoppage measures
-To immediately identify the route of the inflow/outflow and the situation
and report to NISA
We will take measures to follow the above instruction.
* pit: A vertical shaft made of concrete
www.tepco.co.jpby elainekirk 5/11/2011 10:56:56 AM
O I see, just copy image location.by Jim 5/11/2011 11:00:01 AM
Well, I guess it does save the images, because I do have it follow links inside the domain. I could have it follow all the links, but quite honestly--I don't think it's worth it.by Jim 5/11/2011 11:03:14 AM
by Ian via Iangoddard 5/11/2011 11:10:28 AM
iangoddard.com I think it's not camera distortion and seems consistent with the apparent tipping on the Live cam. We're only seeing the upper half on the live camera.
by Ian via Iangoddard 5/11/2011 11:11:07 AM
All I know is that I was getting tired of putting a lot of time in something and then having it buried in minutes. Then later someone would ask the very same question. People don't look back on these things.by Jim 5/11/2011 11:11:39 AM
I'm sure there's some distortion in the close photos and my lines might not be right, but I think there tip issues, though maybe not as bad as it seems on live cam.by Ian 5/11/2011 11:12:47 AM
@Ian That looks straight.by Jim 5/11/2011 11:13:27 AM
@Ian : i agree there is a collapse tendency of the upper floor, but no leaning of the building.by Edano 5/11/2011 11:14:21 AM
Aside from lens distortion.by Jim 5/11/2011 11:14:33 AM
interesting: the new photos seem to be tepco's answer to the "leaning" rumors.by Edano 5/11/2011 11:16:41 AM
Jim, I don't think lens 'fish bowling' can fully account for the lower photo, upper section on the left. The upper section might collapse, but yeah, tip-over for the whole unit seems much less likely in close view. Of course we're assuming these photos were taken yesterday, there's a time code on these photos that's been blurred out, I wonder why.by Ian 5/11/2011 11:18:00 AM
I think the lens is likely the culprit in that photo. The only way to avoid it is to have a large format camera or modify it in photoshop.by carabnr 5/11/2011 11:21:17 AM
I went back into their web site and tried to find something useful for today..to no avail.by Jim 5/11/2011 11:21:22 AM
@carabnr Yeah, look at the ground. I can straighten that in my mind and it would be ok.by Jim 5/11/2011 11:22:33 AM
plus the first pic posted shows the building to the right looks plumb.by carabnr 5/11/2011 11:27:37 AM
That pump unit is on the wrong side of the building for those photo's to be recent I would have thoughtby elainekirk 5/11/2011 11:36:29 AM
The cryptome images just released are from late April. I am assuming that is what everyone is talking about?by Nancy 5/11/2011 11:38:38 AM
The flicker gallery of them stated they were late april.by Nancy 5/11/2011 11:39:36 AM
The EXIF data seems to be removed from the pictures with blurred time/date as well?by Jocke_Jensen 5/11/2011 11:40:27 AM
@Jocke_Jensen Yepby Jim 5/11/2011 11:41:53 AM
@Jocke_Jensen No internal photo data on any of them and the date blurred. Not sure why the data was removed, possibly not official photos?by Nancy 5/11/2011 11:43:43 AM
From the flicker page "Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant conditions (late April 2011)"by Nancy 5/11/2011 11:46:14 AM
by Nancy 5/11/2011 11:46:16 AM
@Nancy They do a good job of confusion.by Jim 5/11/2011 11:46:50 AM
good morning @allby dean 5/11/2011 11:48:20 AM
And the government are just corporate puppets.by Jim 5/11/2011 11:48:29 AM
@Jim Cryptome didn't give any info but the zip file.by Nancy 5/11/2011 11:48:46 AM
This is my picture of the day. One of the tanks. www.houseoffoust.com
by Nancy via Houseoffoust 5/11/2011 11:49:00 AM
hi deanby Jim 5/11/2011 11:49:53 AM
Nancy.. were you able to find the yellow cap in all those photosby dean 5/11/2011 11:50:22 AM
stange. to me it says: "Dieses Foto wurde am 10. Mai 2011 aufgenommen." - foto taken may 10, 2011. www.flickr.com
by Edano via Flickr 5/11/2011 11:50:27 AM
HI jim,, early riserby dean 5/11/2011 11:50:36 AM
@dean Had to get up. The cops were busting me.by Jim 5/11/2011 11:51:42 AM
they want your hard driveby dean 5/11/2011 11:54:05 AM
Japan Earthquake | Page 1097
- Who's Blogging
-
hudebnik
alblee
UKVal
Jonathan Keebler
Oliver (ScribbleLive)
kaykodh
Markfm
Angie
Mid Valley
Matt (ScribbleLive)
George Gibb- elainekirk
PKelley
lillymunster
dean
bo
Edano
Deb
Pedro Jesus
IanGoddard