
@ lilly.. Peter had composed a letter in response to NRC and I said I would look at the second part.. can I mail this to you so you can forward on for review?
by dean 6/26/2011 1:51:25 PM

@dean Email me what you have. I can add it to what I have so far and put it up for peer review.
by lillymunster 6/26/2011 1:52:40 PM

Going back through older fuku images today looking for missed signs of the fissure Elaine found. Noticing how upright buildings and towers seem in those images 10 days after vs. images in June.
by lillymunster 6/26/2011 1:54:12 PM

ty lilly.. I layed down last night and thought.. I just hadn't put enough into my response so I redid it and feel better now
by dean 6/26/2011 1:54:19 PM

sounds good lilly,, hey, did you determine that the #1 stack is tipping?
by dean 6/26/2011 1:54:54 PM

@dean Not for sure. I think it may be. There is a possibility everything in that line is at an angle. We knew that the land moved and sunk. Now that fissure that we know about is sort of in line with the things that have tipped or sunk.
by lillymunster 6/26/2011 1:59:11 PM

@Pedro Jesus My current one is an HP. I had a few Toshiba before that, they are pretty durable. Handed them both down to the kids to use and they didn't manage to destroy them. :-)
by lillymunster 6/26/2011 2:00:05 PM

see you all later
by dean 6/26/2011 2:07:05 PM

@Pedro Jesus I was smart enough to buy a business class laptop. Some of the consumer models they sell at retail stores are really low quality and have thin plastic parts. Have not looked to see what brand/model hard drive is in this one.
by lillymunster 6/26/2011 2:14:07 PM

@LM Any idea on details (I hate that Kyodo blocks news stories)? Wondering if these are residents rather than workers. Concerning all of a survey batch had internal exposure.
by lillymunster 6/26/2011 2:31:32 PM

@LM I saw it a few pages back. Why were they not adding boron anymore?
by lillymunster 6/26/2011 2:37:12 PM

@estacion guessing they are doing water injection tonight. Since they mentioned the boron going into 3. Will be interested to see if we get an EQ.
by lillymunster 6/26/2011 2:40:51 PM

@LM Dumb question, do they put boron into the SFP water during normal operation? Or is this something needed because they are using untreated fresh water? They did mention rubble in the pool jacking the calcium levels.
by lillymunster 6/26/2011 2:42:14 PM

@LM They have metal clad panels with boron inside, the rods are put inside those in the SFP. Not sure if boron as a water additive would be used though since the water between the SFP and reactor mingle when they flood both to move fuel. Maybe keeping the water at the right balance in the SFP avoids the corrosion?
by lillymunster 6/26/2011 2:55:45 PM

@Bobby1 Hi Bobby! Interesting. Mar 20-21 was when 3 went to atmosphere pressure. IIRC someone mentioned some rad spikes on those days in the area of the plant.
It would depend if boron is acidic it could be used to swing the water back to a neutral PH. I have to do things like that with our aquarium because our water is horrible. Let me go look at boron properties...
by lillymunster 6/26/2011 2:57:52 PM

Boric acid (what they are probably using) has a ph of 5.2 so it could logically be used to bring the ph to a more neutral level. They said the water was too alkaline.
by lillymunster 6/26/2011 3:02:33 PM

@Edano what kind of intervention would we need to do if something crashes? Or just make sure it is still feeding? I am assuming the files you put on my server has the source location. I would hope TEPCO wouldn't change the feed in that time so shouldn't need anything other than making sure it is still posting right.
by lillymunster 6/26/2011 3:12:29 PM

@Edano can do. :-)
by lillymunster 6/26/2011 3:13:48 PM

@Bobby1 I have not been tracking the rad readings in detail lately. I was curious if we were seeing iodine drop off or not. Are these the in plant rad readings or the regional ones?
by lillymunster 6/26/2011 3:14:44 PM

@Edano yes.
by lillymunster 6/26/2011 3:14:59 PM

@Bobby1 do you mean the water building up in the lower levels of the buildings? Yes that is mingling between buildings, pits etc. We should see iodine 131 dropping in comparison to the cesium levels. The difference between the two shows if it increases or is going down vs. just finding some more radioactive water. So iodine level alone doesn't mean new activity. I was thinking the other day we should be able to get enough rad reading data around the plant to tell if there is some sort of criticality happening as long as we get both iodine and cesium to read.
by lillymunster 6/26/2011 3:20:59 PM

@Bobby1 I tried looking at some of the rad reporting Mark has pinned. METI is in Japanese so can't read it. MEXT only does sVh. Is TEPCO releasing analysis of plant areas based on isotope?
by lillymunster 6/26/2011 3:32:05 PM