@lillymunster
8/19 17:00 433
8/19 23:00 335
by Edano 8/20/2011 2:10:00 AM
quake was 14:36 jst
by Edano 8/20/2011 2:10:14 AM
pressure lost in #1
by Edano 8/20/2011 2:10:53 AM
back
by dean 8/20/2011 2:11:04 AM
@Edano Is that what those numbers are? Pressure at 1?
by lillymunster 8/20/2011 2:11:22 AM
@lillymunster sorry i correct them
8/19 17:00 433
8/19 23:00 335
quake was 14:36 jst
by Edano 8/20/2011 2:12:42 AM
Sv/h. i forgot to remove the period.
by Edano 8/20/2011 2:13:02 AM
(slight) pressure loss in #1 and #2.
by Edano 8/20/2011 2:14:31 AM
Are the pressure drops worth noting? What about changes at 3?
by lillymunster 8/20/2011 2:14:58 AM
en.wikipedia.org interesting read.. list of civilian radiation accidents from before 1950's to present,,, as reported
by dean 8/20/2011 2:15:53 AM
@lillymunster well, if you take a look at the graphs, #1 and 2 lose pressure on every quake. they ought not lose pressure, because nitrogen is being filled in.
by Edano 8/20/2011 2:16:29 AM
#3: rising temps and dropping water level.
by Edano 8/20/2011 2:17:59 AM
@Edano do they ever recover pressure (1 & 2) or steady down?
by lillymunster 8/20/2011 2:20:09 AM
so there are some very clear correlations between the quakes and radiation, pressure and temps in #1 & 2, while in #3 rising temps and losing water.
by Edano 8/20/2011 2:21:51 AM
@lillymunster steady down, no recovery.
by Edano 8/20/2011 2:22:17 AM
Any over all interpretation you want to add on these?
by lillymunster 8/20/2011 2:24:27 AM
@lillymunster i have not entirely checked everything and i have to add the markers for the last earthquake. it takes a bit time to analyze it....but i think the most important changes i told you already.
by Edano 8/20/2011 2:28:03 AM
interpretation: pressure leaves #1 and 2 reactor on every quake. pressure in form of radioactive steam. probably thru holes in the secondary containment.
by Edano 8/20/2011 2:29:25 AM
I can wait to post something if you want time to mess with it.
by lillymunster 8/20/2011 2:30:50 AM
radiation spikes indicate relocating corium on every quake.
by Edano 8/20/2011 2:30:59 AM
#3: maybe they reduced cooling water, so that temps rise and water level drop. but the correlation to the earthquake indicates a quake caused loss of water.
by Edano 8/20/2011 2:32:25 AM
@lillymunster no, you can write it. i will check again when the next data comes (18:00 jst). now it's bedtime for me (4:30 in germany).
by Edano 8/20/2011 2:34:06 AM
@ Edano, I wondered if, after some time following an earthquake,, the corium forms a crust of some sort that may affect the radiation level readings and then another EQ and all that is broken up with increasing levels of radiation
by dean 8/20/2011 2:35:03 AM
rest well Edano, you are a remarkable researcher
by dean 8/20/2011 2:35:34 AM
@dean a good idea. could be an explanation. i don't know how stable the crust is.
by Edano 8/20/2011 2:36:11 AM
but we could write that as an explanation. cracking of corium crust might lead to rad spikes after an earthquake. good theory !
by Edano 8/20/2011 2:37:03 AM
I will write up an interim report. We can update as needed. :-)
by lillymunster 8/20/2011 2:37:14 AM
Will add Dean's to it
by lillymunster 8/20/2011 2:37:29 AM
@dean ty i'm quite good with maths and analysis... :)
by Edano 8/20/2011 2:38:49 AM
aren't we still trying to determine where the location of the radiation detectors are?
by dean 8/20/2011 2:39:54 AM
i will sleep over the corium crust cracking theory. maybe this idea leads to further explanations or hypothesis ....
by Edano 8/20/2011 2:40:00 AM
en.wikipedia.org military nuclear accidents
by dean 8/20/2011 2:40:27 AM
@dean yes, do you know anything ?
by Edano 8/20/2011 2:40:43 AM
rest up Edano
by dean 8/20/2011 2:40:54 AM
I don't but I can research it also,,, are we looking for the coldwell or other area?
by dean 8/20/2011 2:41:20 AM
also.. lilly had what the channels were on the monitoring system that may help me search and ask colleagues
by dean 8/20/2011 2:41:58 AM
@dean 4 detectors: drywell A, drywell B, torus A, torus B.
by Edano 8/20/2011 2:42:29 AM
@dean Is Edano's post what you were looking for?
by lillymunster 8/20/2011 2:43:30 AM
Oh duh. Yes, one we were trying to find location for was drywell b so we could tell where corium might be in relation
by lillymunster 8/20/2011 2:44:30 AM
I will search for the detector locations and hope they are pretty much the same for BWR's
by dean 8/20/2011 2:46:57 AM
@lily.. do you know where the others are located?
by dean 8/20/2011 2:47:11 AM
off. bye :)
by Edano 8/20/2011 2:47:53 AM
nite Edano
by dean 8/20/2011 2:48:06 AM
by Edano via Houseoffoust 8/20/2011 2:23:21 AM
by Edano via Houseoffoust 8/20/2011 2:25:43 AM
hudebnik
alblee
UKVal
Oliver (ScribbleLive)
Jonathan Keebler
kaykodh
PKelley
Markfm
Angie
Deb
Mid Valley
Pedro Jesus
Matt (ScribbleLive)
George Gibb
elainekirk
bo
IanGoddard