
@Peter I wondered why they waited so long also. I am trying to find the document from the other day where TEPCO mentions watering changes to closer access the corium, this sounded in addition to the core spray change and they stated they didn't know where the corium was. They seem suddenly much more interested in the goings on at the bottom of the containment buildings.
by lillymunster 9/16/2011 2:22:12 PM

Professional wrestler gives 500 radiation detectors to kindergartners
search.japantimes.co.jpForestry service testing forests trying to figure how to decontaminate
mdn.mainichi.jpTsunami victim washes up onshore 6 months later
mdn.mainichi.jpby lillymunster 9/16/2011 2:28:46 PM

in my mind I try to visualize a heap of tons of corium perhaps in multiple places but centrally more dense. Then the introduction of water from the feed water system attempting to cool the mass from outside in. Then as identified, they decide lets put water through the reactor spray and they see some paramater changes. That tells me something about how sensitive the corium mass is to different cooling paths and temperature of the cooling water. They typically pre-heat the water before it goes back in the reactor when operating but in this condition the temp of water could be real low. The spray and feed water flow rates in GPM is low.. as I calculate (need a check from one of you)...
by dean 9/16/2011 2:29:20 PM

@Peter I wasn't aware the corum at Chernobyl had paths. I thought the elephant foot was all of what was left. But I have not studied Chernobyl much at all.
by lillymunster 9/16/2011 2:31:05 PM

@Ian those obnoxious auto play ads will show up as being malware. I wish scribble would stop using those. The image ads are understandable. But I have always had an aversion to animated and autoplay video ads. I think they are annoying and tend to do more to damage a brand than advertise it.
by lillymunster 9/16/2011 2:32:33 PM

flow rates through the spray were 3 m3/hr = 13 gpm.... and feed water 4 m3/hr = 18 gpm... .this is a total of about31 gpm........ pretty small... I looked up what a standard garden hose 3/4 in puts out and it's about 10 gpm.... if these figures are correct, the water spray volume would be very small... not sure how to interpret the data... would some one please check the math?
by dean 9/16/2011 2:33:29 PM

The low-pressure core spray system is designed to suppress steam generated by a major contingency. As such, it prevents reactor vessel pressure from going above the point where LPCI and LPCS would be ineffective, which is above 32 atm (3200 kPa, 465 psi). It activates below that level, and delivers approximately 48,000 L/min (12,500 US gal/min) of water in a deluge from the top of the core.
Versioning note: In ABWRs and (E)SBWRs, there are additional water spray systems to cool the drywell and the suppression pool.
by dean 9/16/2011 2:35:17 PM

The low-pressure coolant injection system, the "heavy artillery" in the ECCS, can be operated at reactor vessel pressures below 465 psi. The LPCI consists of 4 pumps driven by diesel engines, and is capable of injecting a mammoth 150,000 L/min (40,000 US gal/min) of water into the core . Combined with the CS to keep steam pressure low, the LPCI is designed to suppress contingencies by rapidly and completely flooding the core with coolant
by dean 9/16/2011 2:35:42 PM

I am not sure which system they are using to feed water to the two injection points.. feed water and spray..
by dean 9/16/2011 2:36:15 PM

@ lilly, the corium at chernobyl flowed out several paths the majority of which was out that bottom head area where we've seen those elephant foot photos
by dean 9/16/2011 2:38:13 PM

@Dean, the BWR units do not have a way to cool the supression chamber?
by lillymunster 9/16/2011 2:40:08 PM

Did Chernobyl attempt water spraying for a time before they started dumping in sand?
by lillymunster 9/16/2011 2:42:19 PM

@ lilly.. the suppression chamber has cooling but I would have to look it up to see if it's an auxilliary system or part of the water inlet spray to that area so condensing can take place
by dean 9/16/2011 2:44:06 PM

#2 suppression chamber is badly holed iirc
by elainekirk 9/16/2011 2:46:12 PM


Ran across this interesting image of corium at Chernobyl from 96. Notice the guy not wearing any face mask. smbhax.com

@elainekirk yes, size of a motor cycle, downgraded from size of a house. :-)
by lillymunster 9/16/2011 2:46:49 PM

@ lilly.. there are other photos of corium flowing our of areas around that elephant foot
by dean 9/16/2011 2:46:57 PM

@dean I found a DOE library of images, going through them now.
by lillymunster 9/16/2011 2:47:20 PM

Bummer, their file server isn't working.
insp.pnnl.govby lillymunster 9/16/2011 2:52:55 PM

as for the article on trying to determine the status on the control rods. I looked at the diagram with the probe and can see how they expect things to work. At this point I wonder why it's so critical to determine the condition of the control rods as operating them, if they are operable, would upset the debris in the core.
by dean 9/16/2011 2:54:00 PM

The molten reactor core accumulated in the room 305/2, until it reached the edges of the steam relief valves; then it migrated downward to the Steam Distribution Corridor. It also broke or burned through into the room 304/3.[31] The corium flowed from the reactor in three streams. Stream 1 was composed of brown lava and molten steel; steel formed a layer on the floor of the Steam Distribution Corridor, on the Level +6, with brown corium on its top. From this area, brown corium flowed through the Steam Distribution Channels into the Pressure Suppression Pools on the Level +3 and Level 0, forming porous and slag-like formations there. Stream 2 was composed of black lava, and entered the other side of the Steam Distribution Corridor. Stream 3, also composed of black lavas, flown to other areas under the reactor. The well-known "Elephant's Foot" structure is composed of two metric tons of black lava,[18] forming a multilayered structure similar to tree bark. It is said to be melted 2 meters deep into the concrete. As the material was dangerously radioactive and hard and strong, and using remote controlled systems was not possible due to high radiation interfering with electronics,[35] shooting at it from an AK-47 was used to split off chunks for analysis.[36][37][38]
by dean 9/16/2011 2:55:18 PM

that was in chernobyl @ lilly
by dean 9/16/2011 2:55:34 PM

en.wikipedia.org article on corium at chernobyl with good information on what it consisted of.. this may be used to compare what the samples from FUKU would sho
by dean 9/16/2011 2:56:38 PM

by dean 9/16/2011 3:00:07 PM


Some more corium flow images a1.img.mobypicture.com


A control cabinet, possibly graphite and corium www.spaceman.ca


This one doesn't say location www.spaceman.ca



good ones @ lilly
by dean 9/16/2011 3:06:59 PM

strange how there is this well documented photo collection of corium stretching back decades to the very beginings of digital technology and yet fuku want us to believe they don't even know where theirs is despite the numerous camera's etc that are built in to containments etc
by elainekirk 9/16/2011 3:10:01 PM


Found this one, not corium. The sideways lighter pieces is the reactor cap, said to be as heavy as 6 locomotive engines. Was flipped in the blast. www.roundtree7.com

gallery.spaceman.ca @ lilly check out the photos on this link also
by dean 9/16/2011 3:11:11 PM

The chernobyl images were many taken 10 years later. Said they had issues getting robotic equipment in there due to the radiation,
by lillymunster 9/16/2011 3:11:31 PM

true @ elaine
by dean 9/16/2011 3:11:39 PM

@ lilly.. that link I found is the best I have seen on chernobyl with good photo's and some graphics
by dean 9/16/2011 3:13:56 PM