Japan Earthquake | Page 2843

  • Quake hits Dominican Republic, no reported damage

    (AP) – 56 minutes ago

    SANTO DOMINGO, Dominican Republic (AP) — A 5.3-magnitude earthquake has struck the southern coast of the Dominican Republic without causing any reported damage or loss of life.

    Local rescue officials and the U.S. Geological Survey say the earthquake struck at 5:35 a.m. local time Thursday, and its epicenter was six miles deep (10 kilometers) in Ocoa province, 34 miles (55 kilometers) west of the capital of Santa Domingo.

    Rescue official Juan Manuel Mendez says his group has not received reports of damages or of people hurt and has not issued any tsunami warning. Mendez says there were reports of hundreds of frightened people rushing out of their houses in various cities, including Santo Domingo.

    Copyright © 2012 The Associated Press. All rights reserved.
    www.google.com
    by Edano 1/5/2012 2:26:48 PM

  • good to hear. i have a lot of friends all over hispaniola island...
    by Edano 1/5/2012 2:31:57 PM

  • This is the website for the MIT researchers who are studying the Pacific flow paths and where the radiation might go. I emailed one of them and he said to follow this web page, it will be where they post updates on their work. fvcom.smast.umassd.edu
    by lillymunster 1/5/2012 2:58:45 PM

  • by Ian 1/5/2012 3:03:13 PM

  • Nuclear Event in USA on Thursday, 05 January, 2012 at 14:04 (02:04 PM) UTC.
    Description
    Operators of the Prairie Island nuclear power plant near Red Wing issued an alert early Thursday after workers discovered chlorine bleach leaking from a tank. Xcel Energy says no radioactive material was released and there is no danger to the public. No workers at the plant were injured. The utility company says sodium hypochloride - otherwise known as bleach - is used to treat water that's brought into the plant for cooling. Xcel says the liquid is fully contained within a berm and both of the plant's units continue to operate at full power. The alert, issued shortly before 4 a.m., assures that emergency personnel are readily available to respond if necessary. The plant is about six miles northwest of Red Wing. Its two reactors generate enough to power for nearly 1 million homes. hisz.rsoe.hu
    by MaryW 1/5/2012 3:25:05 PM

  • @all Good Morning...Good Evening...Hello!
    by smoss 1/5/2012 4:30:49 PM

  • @all Going to post something that does not necessarily reflect my own personal views, but it caught my eye. Misreporting Fukushima: A Failure of Science Journalism with Global Repercussions?
    aaas.confex.com
    by smoss 1/5/2012 4:32:28 PM

  • @smoss, The spin will never end. A non-verbal response might be stronger. The meeting is in February. Occupy Vancouver could line the streets holding the images of the children of Chernobyl and the people of Japan who are now coming forth with pictures of their own.Radiation may be invisible, but some of the profound impacts on living things, are not.
    by eyes 1/5/2012 5:22:46 PM

  • www.jma.go.jp 5.1 in myiagi.

    by Edano via Jma.go.jp 1/5/2012 5:28:48 PM

  • @Edano, Trouble for over 24 hrs getting a link to work on the Long version connection. Could you see if you can link the Long version for this one please. Danke
    by eyes 1/5/2012 5:38:49 PM

  • by eyes 1/5/2012 5:38:52 PM

  • @eyes the long version does not exist (yet ?). the link is wrong.
    by Edano 1/5/2012 5:40:24 PM

  • 2012.01.05 13:00-14:00 is the last long version online. www.youtube.com
    by Edano 1/5/2012 5:43:09 PM

  • search for fuku1long: www.youtube.com
    by Edano 1/5/2012 5:44:51 PM

  • @Edano,Thanks, will go try those
    by eyes 1/5/2012 5:45:52 PM

  • Preliminary Earthquake Report 5.1
    Mercalli scale: 5
    Date-Time [UTC]: 05 January, 2012 at 16:47:09 UTC
    Local Date/Time: Thursday, January 05, 2012 at 16:47 in the afternoon at epicenter
    Location: 38° 43.200, 142° 13.800
    Depth: 60 km (37.28 miles)
    Region: Asia
    Country: Japan
    Distances: 51.16 km (31.79 miles) of Shirahama,
    Source: EMSC Location NPP Distance
    Japan Onagawa Npp 47.69 km
    by MaryW 1/5/2012 6:00:53 PM

  • opps..link here hisz.rsoe.hu
    by MaryW 1/5/2012 6:03:33 PM

  • media.economist.com * Taking off the radium-colored glasses, lol. From: www.economist.com

    by Ian via Media.economist 1/5/2012 6:42:29 PM

  • NRC to have a meeting Jan 19th in Omaha to discuss oversight process for getting the plant ready to restart. Just in time for what may be a year of drought. I would not be surprised to see river level issues this year but it being too low to provide a reliable heat sink.
    by lillymunster 1/5/2012 6:53:24 PM

  • Cancer rates in U.S. keep falling: American Cancer Society www.reuters.com
    I cite from the article what caught my eye: "Despite improvements in the most common cancers, a companion report found an increase in cases of several cancers over the past decade. These included cancers of the pancreas, liver, thyroid, and kidney and melanoma, as well as esophageal cancer and certain types of throat cancers associated with human papillomavirus or HPV infection."
    by Peter 1/5/2012 7:23:30 PM

  • @Peter it says a drop in lung caner accounts for 40% of the slight decline, which of course is attributable to decline of smoking. Perhaps, I'm just guessing, the fall in colon cancer reflects less red-meat consumption.
    by Ian 1/5/2012 7:29:59 PM

  • @Peter Do you know what the typical latency period for thyroid cancer is?
    by lillymunster 1/5/2012 7:42:02 PM

  • Thyroid cancer latency www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

    about 29-37 years - puts possible exposure at 1967 to 1974. based on the 2004 study. I wonder how many years thyroid cancer has been increasing in the US?
    by lillymunster 1/5/2012 7:47:43 PM

  • @Ian , the headline is less than precise. In the summary, the article says:" Cancer death rates are continuing to fall, dropping by 1.8 percent per year in men and 1.6 percent per year in women between 2004 and 2008, according to the American Cancer Society's annual report on cancer statistics released on Wednesday." I should have quoted that right away. We are not talking about rates of occurrence per se. Earlier detection and improved treatment also play a role in this effect. The article does not explain why death from thyroid cancer is on the rise.
    by Peter 1/5/2012 8:03:30 PM

  • @Peter, the way my reply reads sounds a bit like I was countering something you said or implied, but was just popping out an interesting detail. My hunch is the decline is attributable largely to improved personal-health habits. Possibly cancers from the weapons testings are peaking or post peaked.
    by Ian 1/5/2012 8:13:44 PM

  • @lillymunster, the chart here www.dmphp.org Figure 3, suggests that radiation-induced cancers are expected to peak at about 70 years post exposure, if I'm reading it right. So I take back my suggestion that weapons-testing cancers might be post peaked.
    by Ian 1/5/2012 8:18:04 PM

  • @Ian , not to worry. Unfortunately, we are not told why deaths from thyroid cancer are rising. Lilly found an interesting article on latency in ionizing radiation-related thyroid cancers. But thyroid cancers also occur 'spontaneously'. That is, cause and latency are unknown. I need to find out what cause(s) the Cancer Society attributes to this increase.
    by Peter 1/5/2012 8:28:57 PM

  • more info for the thyroid stats www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
    by eyes 1/5/2012 8:33:32 PM

  • Prairie Island NPP had a bleach leak yesterday. They claimed it is used to treat river water used for cooling. So would they be injecting bleach into the river pass through side of the cooling system? Wouldn't that be dumping gallons of this chemical into the river every year?
    by lillymunster 1/5/2012 8:39:53 PM

  • Found this factoid here (obviously not yet updated, :)) www.cancer.org
    What are the key statistics about thyroid cancer?
    The American Cancer Society's most recent estimates for thyroid cancer in the United States are for 2011:

    About 48,020 new cases of thyroid cancer (36,550 in women, and 11,470 in men)
    About 1,740 deaths from thyroid cancer (980 women and 760 men)
    Thyroid cancer is commonly diagnosed at a younger age than most other adult cancers. Nearly 2 of 3 cases are found in people between the ages of 20 and 55.

    The chance of being diagnosed with thyroid cancer has risen in recent years and is now more than twice what it was in 1990. Some of this is the result of the increased use of thyroid ultrasound, which can detect small thyroid nodules that might not otherwise have been found in the past. Still, at least part of the increase is from finding more large tumors as well.

    The death rate from thyroid cancer has been fairly stable for many years, and remains very low compared with most other cancers. Statistics on survival rates for thyroid cancer are discussed in the section, "Thyroid cancer survival by type and stage."

    Last Medical Review: 06/29/2011
    Last Revised: 06/29/2011
    by Peter 1/5/2012 8:42:33 PM

  • Why are they finding more large tumors? More testing or more tumors? Large ones can usually be found on exam rather than just ultrasound.
    by lillymunster 1/5/2012 8:47:11 PM

  • @lillymunster , seems like both!
    by Peter 1/5/2012 8:50:14 PM

  • 2 of my friends have a large debate going on the use of I131 in their treatment. The counter-intuitive nature of using the substance that can result in thyroid cancer, used to treat the problem. The difficulties following treatment when you are a hot zone. The waste products created which then flow back into the environment.They don't agree. ????
    by eyes 1/5/2012 9:12:40 PM

  • @eyes I have seem some debate on it. I think part of the problem comes from medical providers who tell patients there is no downside, no side effects etc. in an effort to reassure patients rather than giving them the truth so they can make an informed decision.
    I think the risk vs outcome has to do with potential for the cancer to come back and if what might come back could be fatal or not. Me personally I would rather go under the knife unless there would be a higher mortality by doing that vs. i-131 as far as cancer coming back and being fatal.
    by lillymunster 1/5/2012 10:00:06 PM

  • upload.wikimedia.org

    Thyroid cancer incidence in children and adolescents from Belarus after the Chernobyl accident.
    Yellow: Adults (19–34)
    Blue: Adolescents (15–18)
    Red: Children (0–14)
    en.wikipedia.org

    by Ian via Upload.wikimedia.org 1/5/2012 10:48:22 PM

  • The report concludes that there were three turning points in the events at Fukushima: inability to supply AC power to the station, inability to remove heat from the reactor, and leakage of hydrogen into the building and hydrogen explosions. It further breaks down the first problem - station blackout - into four subsidiary problems: inability to supply external power, inability to supply power from emergency diesel generators, inability to interchange power sources, and the impossibility of early power recovery. The document analyses each of these issues, lists the reasons why they could not be accomplished, and proposes particular resulting issues to be examined (see box for recommendations). The report concludes, "The essence of the problem is that preparations assuming a contingency brought about by tsunami strike were ineffectual." www.power-eng.com
    by M.I.A. 1/5/2012 11:08:35 PM

  • www.jma.go.jp

    08:28 JST 06 Jan 2012 37.5N 142.0E 20 km 4.6 Fukushima-ken Oki nothing has happened, phuiiii

    the 3rd one within some hours.

    by Edano via Jma.go.jp 1/5/2012 11:49:48 PM

  • History, March 17: publicola.com

    Hanford lab director Jim Conca: "It's not that the reactor is a problem, it's that all this metal is very much heated up and hot, so you have to cool that down. … Yes, I'm adequately sure that the safety systems in place work."

    Conca added: "I'm very happy that Japan has 26 percent nuclear because those will not be the problems. When you see the pictures things burning [in Japan], it won't be nuclear, it'll be the gas-fired power plants and things like that. Nuclear is no problem at all."
    by Ian 1/5/2012 11:49:54 PM


  • March 17: "representatives from the US nuclear energy industry [...] reassured committee members that there was absolutely no risk of nuclear meltdown from [Fukushima] reactors hit by last week's earthquake." publicola.com
    by Ian 1/5/2012 11:58:02 PM

  • @Ian I wonder if Mr Conca would like to retract his statement...
    by lillymunster 1/6/2012 12:16:51 AM

  • @lillymunster, lol, probably not! He'll probably argue Al-Khalili's "a partial meltdown."
    by Ian 1/6/2012 12:34:56 AM

  • @Ian but it didn't leave containment...by a few inches...we are guessing. No immediate harm to human health. Totally safe only a few harmful rumors.
    by lillymunster 1/6/2012 12:46:21 AM

  • Concerns of radioactive cotton grown in Fukushima translate.google.com
    by lillymunster 1/6/2012 12:53:21 AM

  • PG&E asks to charge consumers $80 million dollars to apply to relicense Diablo Canyon. Judge tells them to finish updated seismic study on the nearby fault line first! :-) enformable.com
    by lillymunster 1/6/2012 12:56:46 AM

  • 4.9 quake hits Fukushima at 6:28p EST enenews.com
    by MaryW 1/6/2012 1:01:52 AM

Japan Earthquake | Page 2843

Who's Blogging
  • hudebnikhudebnik
  • albleealblee
  • UKValUKVal
  • Oliver (ScribbleLive)Oliver (ScribbleLive)
  • Jonathan KeeblerJonathan Keebler
  • kaykodhkaykodh
  • PKelleyPKelley
  • MarkfmMarkfm
  • AngieAngie
  • DebDeb
  • Mid ValleyMid Valley
  • Pedro Jesus
  • Matt (ScribbleLive)Matt (ScribbleLive)
  • George GibbGeorge Gibb
  • elainekirkelainekirk
  • lillymunsterlillymunster
  • deandean
  • bobo
  • EdanoEdano
  • IanGoddardIanGoddard