
No better way to raise funding than scaring the poop out of people :-)
by lillymunster 1/3/2012 7:38:25 PM

it is interesting that tepco first drills under reactor #2. #2's core is probably the best of the three.
by Edano 1/3/2012 7:41:46 PM

i think #1 had a china syndrome in the first weeks already.
by Edano 1/3/2012 7:42:31 PM

that's why it was so easy to cool .... without core inside.
by Edano 1/3/2012 7:44:09 PM

@Edano I think 2 may have somehow leaked down under early on also. Remember there was massive high radiation coming out of 2's intake canal. They also mentioned a meter or 3 meter hole in the basement or containment very early on. I remember seeing it in a news report because the translation originally said 30 meters until I rechecked it.
by lillymunster 1/3/2012 7:46:13 PM


all of #1'pics\_1tem.bmp

@Edano I don't disagree about 1.
by lillymunster 1/3/2012 7:47:53 PM

only the moles know the full truth :)
by Edano 1/3/2012 7:51:55 PM

NRC SEEKS PUBLIC COMMENT ON ASSUMPTIONS FOR ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY OF EXTENDED STORAGE OF SPENT NUCLEAR FUEL
The Nuclear Regulatory Commission seeks public comment on a report updating preliminary assumptions for an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) the agency will develop to analyze the effects of storing spent nuclear fuel from the nation’s commercial power reactors
for as much as 200 years.
Comments on the report may be filed by email to WCOutreach@nrc.gov or by U.S mail to Christine Pineda, Project Manager, Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards, Mailstop EBB-2B2, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001.
No. 12-00
by lillymunster 1/3/2012 8:19:13 PM

@MaryW today via email. It should show up on NRC's website in a few days
by lillymunster 1/3/2012 8:29:52 PM

Solar power from external walls / New material allows for more efficient energy production
www.yomiuri.co.jpby lillymunster 1/3/2012 8:44:00 PM

by lillymunster 1/4/2012 1:07:38 AM

Rice will be grown in Fukushima again this spring
t.coby lillymunster 1/4/2012 2:31:18 AM

CRIIRAD (Commission Research and Independent Information on Radioactivity) denounced Wednesday in Lyon, returning from a mission to "serious deficiencies" of the Japanese authorities in the management of the Fukushima nuclear disaster 11 in March.
"How management can it be as bad, twenty-five years after Chernobyl? " questioned during a press conference Chareyron Bruno , an engineer in nuclear physics and member of the Commission, which conducted a measurement campaign and samples to Japan in May.
According to him, "the population has been evacuated to an area sufficient" , it was not distributed iodine tablets quickly "so that they must be ingested three hours before the show " and no distribution plan exists to date about new releases massive, finally, we let the people eat contaminated food, he said.
"ON JAPAN IS WHAT WE DID TO CHERNOBYL"
"Far beyond the forbidden zone of 20 km around the plant, there are radiation doses that induce cancer risks unacceptable" , he said, and "we tolerate a rate of on-site cancer risk twenty times higher than commonly accepted " .
"There on the ground that the authorities are overwhelmed as the industry" , added the scientist. He said it would "remove or decontaminate land " on a radius of several tens of kilometers around the plant.
Roland Desbordes, president of the organization, he is concerned "that raise rates" eligible after each radiation accident: "For economic reasons, it is Japan that has been done at Chernobyl, we don ' evacuates not " people "who live in areas highly contaminated" because their compensation would be too expensive.
www.lemonde.frby lillymunster 1/4/2012 2:39:05 AM

Babies born on March 11 in Tohoku
www.japantimes.co.jpby lillymunster 1/4/2012 3:44:21 AM

A minor point on TEPCO plant updates, update for Jan 2nd. The following line was added to the reports for reactors 4-6
"At this moment, we do not think there is any reactor coolant leakage
inside PCV."
This is not included on units 1-3. Sounds like an admission by omission that they know 1-3 are leaking. We probably already knew that but I don't think TEPCO has been clear about admitting so.
www.tepco.co.jpby lillymunster 1/4/2012 3:58:45 AM

restarted
by lillymunster 1/4/2012 12:55:28 PM

New article on France's upgrades to their reactors. This one has details on the upgrades. They found some considerable things lacking and their reactor fleet is much newer than the US or Japan.
www.businessweek.comby lillymunster 1/4/2012 1:08:48 PM

As radiation fears persist, ties unravel in society
ajw.asahi.comby lillymunster 1/4/2012 1:50:08 PM

New article on the French safety changes and costs
www.simplyinfo.org@all - working on putting together details on the AP 1000 reactor design. If you find information both pros and cons or information on the 2 US ones being constructed please post. MIA found some good NRC documents on the design problems. Trying to assemble what we know about these as they are the only new units in process
by lillymunster 1/4/2012 3:26:03 PM