Japan Earthquake | Page 2887

  • Radioactive concrete from Fukushima found in new buildings in Japan. Such materials are therefore used in the construction of buildings, bridges, and perhaps even temporary housing for refugees in Fukushima ... Also, after the discovery of high levels of radiation in the building of Nihonmatsu, the government decided Monday to open an investigation with a view to determining the final destinations of the contaminated gravel.

    The presence of radioactive cesium in the building complained of has been established through an investigation by local authorities in Nihonmatsu on cumulative exposure to radiation on primary school students. A dosimeter worn by a child residing on the ground floor of the building recorded a rate of radioactivity equivalent to 1.62 millisievert per year. translate.google.com
    by MaryW 1/19/2012 8:50:05 PM

  • not sure if this has been posted already, apologies if it has: 'The water level turned out to be lower then 4.000m at the most.

    Even the radiation resistant endoscope for 1000Sv got too much noise.

    Tepco inserted 2m of the endoscope to reactor2 from the hole called X53 on 1/19/2012. The operation took 6 Tepco employees and 28 workers from subcontract companies. The maximum dose of the worker was 3.07 mSv.

    As the result, they could not see the water surface. Because the radiation level was too high, endoscope had too much noise to capture the clear image.

    The heat gauge on the endoscope measured 44.7℃ at 9:13. The heat gauge set inside of around X53 measured 42.6℃, so Tepco judged the heat gauges inside are not completely broken.

    Unexpectedly, inside was not too steamy but because the evaporated water kept dropping inside, it also prevented the camera from capturing clear image.

    The coating inside of the reactor was damaged and ripped off like squama.

    From the gap of the pressure between inside of the reactor and suppression chamber, Tepco assumed the water level could be above the grating cover, but they could not see the water at least above the cover.

    The height of the cover is around 4.0m from the bottom of the reactor. At least the water level is lower than there.
    fukushima-diary.com
    by UKVal 1/19/2012 8:55:04 PM

  • @lillymunster , I felt the German CO2 and pollution arguments were unsupported claims. Though the use of coal may increase, and we do not know how much, no numbers on air pollution were presented. If the effluents are well scrubbed, this may not amount for as much as they made us believe.
    by Peter 1/19/2012 8:55:33 PM

  • While I was gone I had another thought on cultural differences. When you watch NRC meetings for example, the representatives of the operator introduce themselves in the beginning and explain their functions. I have not seen one tepco appearance where someone stood up and said my name is so-and-so, I am directing the recovery program at Fukushima, these are the steps we are planning to take in the next ninety days, and these are the reasons for our decisions. We only get to meet the messenger boys at the press conferences who only announce and never explain the decisions tepco is taking, plus here and there some engineer commenting whose role at tepco remains nebulous. That kind of public relations under such grave conditions would never fly here.
    by Peter 1/19/2012 9:11:32 PM

  • Plans to restart Fukushima discussed behind closed doors. January 19. 2012. www.panarmenian.net
    by MaryW 1/19/2012 9:15:17 PM

  • @Peter very true. Early on it seemed understandable because everyone with technical skills was scrambling to deal with the disaster. Now to have no contact or statements from technical people is odd. The only contact we had with the actual plant manager was when he took it upon himself to talk to reporters that were allowed in the plant. The one appearance I remember it was very clear he was acting outside of protocol.
    by lillymunster 1/19/2012 9:15:35 PM

  • @Peter The nuclear industry line is that all of the nuclear will be replaced by coal. They conveniently avoid mentioning renewables and residential home power generation.
    by lillymunster 1/19/2012 9:16:30 PM

  • @lillymunster But on the short term that's exactly what happens. Renewable energy plants take a lot longer to deploy than switching the existing coal plants to full power. So, they're not lying there.
    by Pedro Jesus 1/19/2012 9:18:57 PM

  • @Pedro Jesus , only the question remains how much greenhouse gases will this add. In the US, the industry virulently resisted to upgrade their scrubbers to epa-mandated pollution standards, because of cost. The US refrained from signing the Kyoto Protocol. In Germany, that is different.
    by Peter 1/19/2012 9:27:03 PM

  • ...and along my earlier thoughts on tepco PR, I don't believe that the plant director has much influence on recovery planning. The director deals with every day plant ops and may give his input, but I don't think the director does much of the planning. That must be a different set of people at tepco headquarters in Tokyo. I am amazed that tepco does not seem to understand that the way they currently present themselves is no way to rebuild public confidence.
    by Peter 1/19/2012 9:35:39 PM

  • @Peter Very true. But the USA has investment more in renewable energy in 2011 than any other country in the world, including China who was the leader until 2010 (overall, not per capita). So something must be changing in Obama's administration energy strategy.
    by Pedro Jesus 1/19/2012 9:36:35 PM

  • I meant, invested.... my comment was to your other one in response to mine.
    by Pedro Jesus 1/19/2012 9:38:16 PM

  • The nuke industry claim on coal in Germany was that this was a long term thing as in they will just use coal and renewables didn't exist or were not part of the mix and that coal would have to be used until some new technology is invented.
    by lillymunster 1/19/2012 10:08:46 PM

  • @lillymunster the nuke industry apparently admits their defeat against renewables and instead tries a rearguard battle against coal. :)
    by Edano 1/19/2012 10:19:11 PM

  • Some oil companies researching greener alternatives:

    "GM microbe breakthrough paves way for large-scale seaweed farming for biofuels"
    "Scientists have created a genetically engineered microbe that turns the algae into low-carbon biofuel, but must make the technique commercially viable" (Damian Carrington) www.guardian.co.uk
    by Pedro Jesus 1/19/2012 10:55:39 PM

  • And some others enlarge their profits through market speculation at the consumer's cost:

    "AA calls for inquiry over cost of diesel"
    "Motoring organisations around Europe call for investigation into market manipulation as diesel costs reach record levels" (Terry Macalister) www.guardian.co.uk
    by Pedro Jesus 1/19/2012 11:01:14 PM

  • @Edano nice distraction technique they have isn't it. ;-)
    by lillymunster 1/19/2012 11:16:29 PM

  • NISA: Unconnected battery heightened nuclear crisis
    by lillymunster 1/20/2012 12:16:05 AM

  • NISA: Unconnected battery heightened nuclear crisis
    ajw.asahi.com
    by lillymunster 1/20/2012 12:16:29 AM

  • The operator of the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant has found 500 tons of highly radioactive water near the crippled No.2 reactor.

    On December 18th, Tokyo Electric Power Company workers found radioactive water in an underground tunnel at a facility to store highly contaminated water.

    Under the government's direction, this month TEPCO started checking whether radioactive water is collecting in the plant's other underground facilities.

    On Thursday, the utility found around 500 tons of contaminated water in a pit near the No.2 reactor. The pit has a valve which is used for pumping in seawater.

    The analysis of the contaminated water shows it has 16,200 becquerels of radioactive cesium per cubic centimeter. That represents the highest level of radioactive substances found in this month's survey.

    TEPCO also detected 600 tons of water containing 860 becquerels of radioactive elements per cubic centimeter in a pit near the No.3 reactor.

    The utility says the radioactive water is unlikely to have leaked into the ocean as the density of radioactive materials in seawater near the No.2 and No.3 reactors has remained unchanged.

    The company plans to determine how the contaminated water collected in the tunnels.
    Friday, January 20, 2012 06:24 +0900 (JST) www3.nhk.or.jp
    by MaryW 1/20/2012 12:22:29 AM

  • 16,200 becquerels of cesium-WOW!
    by MaryW 1/20/2012 12:23:29 AM

  • 2,500 US Walmart Stores Selling "Japanese" Cuisine Pushed by Japanese Food Giant Ajinomoto
    since September 2011. There is no critical thinking behind the CNN article below; if there were, the writer would have asked questions like "Where are the ingredients coming from?"
    ex-skf.blogspot.com
    by Majj 1/20/2012 12:23:38 AM

  • Ohio gozaimasu from Hiroshima
    by bo 1/20/2012 12:25:04 AM

  • back for a bit
    by dean 1/20/2012 12:25:17 AM

  • TEPCO's excuse

    But TEPCO said the cable was too short for the connection, and the data transmission equipment remained separated from the emergency battery because the company decided it wasn’t an urgent job, NISA said.
    by lillymunster 1/20/2012 12:25:32 AM

  • So TEPCO didn't bother to connect the cable to the emergency battery to the emergency data transmission system because the cable was too short and they didn't think it was a big deal. This was supposed to send reactor data to NISA to feed into SPEEDI ::Headdesk::
    by lillymunster 1/20/2012 12:38:23 AM

  • Criminal neglect. Murderous neglect.
    by bo 1/20/2012 1:04:05 AM

  • 'Dip in nuclear power support after Fukushima proves shortlived
    A new, exclusive opinion poll shows public support for replacing the UK's ageing nuclear plants has recovered, although some citizens are far less convinced than others' www.guardian.co.uk ..Grrrrr!!!!**!!!
    by UKVal 1/20/2012 1:06:54 AM

  • Iwaki rubble and garbage being burned in a Saitama incinerator and has been since March. ex-skf-jp.blogspot.com
    by lillymunster 1/20/2012 1:12:44 AM

  • @bo I keep reading that and the one on the power line over again thinking I must be mis-reading it. That is just insane. Someone needs to go to jail.
    by lillymunster 1/20/2012 1:13:41 AM

  • @lilly agreed. Beyond the design flaws, beyond the natural disaster, the fundamental neglect of public safety that has led to such dangers, and such economic ruin. Heads should roll.
    by bo 1/20/2012 1:18:35 AM

  • @bo The type of cable these systems have are absolutely basic. Any electrical or industrial computer supplier would have a longer one. It is similar to a battery back up for a computer server or for off grid power. This isn't some expensive proprietary piece of equipment.
    by lillymunster 1/20/2012 1:24:22 AM

  • @lillymunster , ah, we are told in the article that the cable was not mandatory, ;)
    by Peter 1/20/2012 1:31:20 AM

  • @lilly $5 saved is $5 earned!
    by bo 1/20/2012 1:36:01 AM

  • Of course, we need a law to instruct someone to plug in the power to a critical piece of emergency equipment. :-)
    by lillymunster 1/20/2012 1:37:53 AM

  • A Judge Rules Vermont Can’t Shut Nuclear Plant www.nytimes.com
    by lillymunster 1/20/2012 1:40:18 AM

  • That was the one question I got through on the PBS live chat yesterday, why can't state/local people have a say/vote in having a reactor in their back yard.
    by lillymunster 1/20/2012 1:42:03 AM

  • The industry knows that if people have a say, they won't be able to build one anywhere. So they eliminate this possibility through politics.
    by bo 1/20/2012 1:43:33 AM

  • @bo The response I got from Miles Obrien was we shouldn't determine energy policy by referendum. He totally misses the other part of the issue that we should have a say in having a horribly high risk entity plopped in your back yard that has the potential to completely ruin someone and bankrupt them though no fault of their own.
    by lillymunster 1/20/2012 1:46:25 AM

  • @lilly in this era where we live in the ruins of a society in the grip of predatory capitalism, believing that our "betters" know what is better has not proved so intelligent. It may not be the place of regular folks to know what is the best energy policy, but there is no doubt that they have a very grounded idea of which ways are the worst.
    by bo 1/20/2012 1:49:31 AM

  • I didn't realize Entergy bought V. Yankee from the local utilities. So they buy the plant from the local control and then lord it over them. Nice.
    by lillymunster 1/20/2012 1:49:51 AM

  • @bo I think there is a role for public input somewhere in the process. The move away from literal public utilities has proven to be a beast we can't control. We have public utility commissions and they are completely neutered.
    by lillymunster 1/20/2012 1:52:15 AM

  • @lilly absolutely the power should rest in the communities. They centralize power and then tell us that only centralized power generation and distribution are feasible.
    by bo 1/20/2012 1:54:17 AM

  • The article mentions Rancho Seco being shut down by public vote because the municipal utility owned it. It was really unpopular when I lived there in the 80's. There were lots of safety concerns so people shut it down and obviously they figured out some other way to power things.
    by lillymunster 1/20/2012 1:54:53 AM

  • Vermont has had a big surge in people installing residential solar and wind. I have to wonder if it is partial backlash against the fight with Entergy.
    by lillymunster 1/20/2012 1:58:31 AM

Japan Earthquake | Page 2887

Who's Blogging
  • hudebnikhudebnik
  • albleealblee
  • UKValUKVal
  • Oliver (ScribbleLive)Oliver (ScribbleLive)
  • Jonathan KeeblerJonathan Keebler
  • kaykodhkaykodh
  • PKelleyPKelley
  • MarkfmMarkfm
  • AngieAngie
  • DebDeb
  • Mid ValleyMid Valley
  • Pedro Jesus
  • Matt (ScribbleLive)Matt (ScribbleLive)
  • George GibbGeorge Gibb
  • elainekirkelainekirk
  • lillymunsterlillymunster
  • deandean
  • bobo
  • EdanoEdano
  • IanGoddardIanGoddard