
@Peter very true. Early on it seemed understandable because everyone with technical skills was scrambling to deal with the disaster. Now to have no contact or statements from technical people is odd. The only contact we had with the actual plant manager was when he took it upon himself to talk to reporters that were allowed in the plant. The one appearance I remember it was very clear he was acting outside of protocol.
by lillymunster 1/19/2012 9:15:35 PM

@Peter The nuclear industry line is that all of the nuclear will be replaced by coal. They conveniently avoid mentioning renewables and residential home power generation.
by lillymunster 1/19/2012 9:16:30 PM

The nuke industry claim on coal in Germany was that this was a long term thing as in they will just use coal and renewables didn't exist or were not part of the mix and that coal would have to be used until some new technology is invented.
by lillymunster 1/19/2012 10:08:46 PM

@lillymunster the nuke industry apparently admits their defeat against renewables and instead tries a rearguard battle against coal. :)
by Edano 1/19/2012 10:19:11 PM

@Edano nice distraction technique they have isn't it. ;-)
by lillymunster 1/19/2012 11:16:29 PM

NISA: Unconnected battery heightened nuclear crisis
by lillymunster 1/20/2012 12:16:05 AM

NISA: Unconnected battery heightened nuclear crisis
ajw.asahi.comby lillymunster 1/20/2012 12:16:29 AM

Ohio gozaimasu from Hiroshima
by bo 1/20/2012 12:25:04 AM

back for a bit
by dean 1/20/2012 12:25:17 AM

TEPCO's excuse
But TEPCO said the cable was too short for the connection, and the data transmission equipment remained separated from the emergency battery because the company decided it wasn’t an urgent job, NISA said.
by lillymunster 1/20/2012 12:25:32 AM

So TEPCO didn't bother to connect the cable to the emergency battery to the emergency data transmission system because the cable was too short and they didn't think it was a big deal. This was supposed to send reactor data to NISA to feed into SPEEDI ::Headdesk::
by lillymunster 1/20/2012 12:38:23 AM

Criminal neglect. Murderous neglect.
by bo 1/20/2012 1:04:05 AM

Iwaki rubble and garbage being burned in a Saitama incinerator and has been since March.
ex-skf-jp.blogspot.comby lillymunster 1/20/2012 1:12:44 AM

@bo I keep reading that and the one on the power line over again thinking I must be mis-reading it. That is just insane. Someone needs to go to jail.
by lillymunster 1/20/2012 1:13:41 AM

@lilly agreed. Beyond the design flaws, beyond the natural disaster, the fundamental neglect of public safety that has led to such dangers, and such economic ruin. Heads should roll.
by bo 1/20/2012 1:18:35 AM

@bo The type of cable these systems have are absolutely basic. Any electrical or industrial computer supplier would have a longer one. It is similar to a battery back up for a computer server or for off grid power. This isn't some expensive proprietary piece of equipment.
by lillymunster 1/20/2012 1:24:22 AM

@lilly $5 saved is $5 earned!
by bo 1/20/2012 1:36:01 AM

Of course, we need a law to instruct someone to plug in the power to a critical piece of emergency equipment. :-)
by lillymunster 1/20/2012 1:37:53 AM

A Judge Rules Vermont Can’t Shut Nuclear Plant
www.nytimes.comby lillymunster 1/20/2012 1:40:18 AM

That was the one question I got through on the PBS live chat yesterday, why can't state/local people have a say/vote in having a reactor in their back yard.
by lillymunster 1/20/2012 1:42:03 AM

The industry knows that if people have a say, they won't be able to build one anywhere. So they eliminate this possibility through politics.
by bo 1/20/2012 1:43:33 AM

@bo The response I got from Miles Obrien was we shouldn't determine energy policy by referendum. He totally misses the other part of the issue that we should have a say in having a horribly high risk entity plopped in your back yard that has the potential to completely ruin someone and bankrupt them though no fault of their own.
by lillymunster 1/20/2012 1:46:25 AM

@lilly in this era where we live in the ruins of a society in the grip of predatory capitalism, believing that our "betters" know what is better has not proved so intelligent. It may not be the place of regular folks to know what is the best energy policy, but there is no doubt that they have a very grounded idea of which ways are the worst.
by bo 1/20/2012 1:49:31 AM

I didn't realize Entergy bought V. Yankee from the local utilities. So they buy the plant from the local control and then lord it over them. Nice.
by lillymunster 1/20/2012 1:49:51 AM

@bo I think there is a role for public input somewhere in the process. The move away from literal public utilities has proven to be a beast we can't control. We have public utility commissions and they are completely neutered.
by lillymunster 1/20/2012 1:52:15 AM

@lilly absolutely the power should rest in the communities. They centralize power and then tell us that only centralized power generation and distribution are feasible.
by bo 1/20/2012 1:54:17 AM

The article mentions Rancho Seco being shut down by public vote because the municipal utility owned it. It was really unpopular when I lived there in the 80's. There were lots of safety concerns so people shut it down and obviously they figured out some other way to power things.
by lillymunster 1/20/2012 1:54:53 AM

Vermont has had a big surge in people installing residential solar and wind. I have to wonder if it is partial backlash against the fight with Entergy.
by lillymunster 1/20/2012 1:58:31 AM