Japan Earthquake | Page 1234

  • Pedro, TEPCO still reports WL daily, see the table at the end of www.meti.go.jp TEPCO does, however, acknowledge that #2 and #3 may have the same broken instruments. Note that they are still reporting reactor 1 WL B reading, -1750 mm, even though they know it's wrong.
    by Markfm edited by Markfm 5/17/2011 5:56:22 PM

  • Seems #4 is still steaming away, the damage i noticed the other day (missing section of #4 structure) can now clearly be seen on the TBS cam, look at rh corner of building.
    by WolfDK 5/17/2011 5:57:32 PM

  • So, they are providing reports with known bad readings. Par for the course.
    by Markfm 5/17/2011 5:58:03 PM

  • elaine are you there
    by dean 5/17/2011 5:58:44 PM

  • Looking at the English summary from NISA for 16 May, NISA directed "shall be infallibly carried out". I guess there are no more worries, NISA has spoken...
    by Markfm 5/17/2011 6:00:23 PM

  • preliminary data for my write up... divided into 3 cases depending on what systems were available to the operators after the EQ/TSUNAMI...
    by dean 5/17/2011 6:00:29 PM

  • Does it include operator intervention to turn off systems that actually were working?
    by Markfm 5/17/2011 6:01:08 PM

  • time start can be 10 minutes after EQ when problems were experienced with diesel generators..
    by dean 5/17/2011 6:01:17 PM

  • @dean yes I am here
    by elainekirk 5/17/2011 6:01:23 PM

  • @Pedro, you are getting the basement and basemat mixed up. The "basement" is the lower parts of the building around the torus. It is not underneath the reactor. The "Basemat" (Drywell or D/W) is the concrete that is directly underneath the reactor. There is NO water in the basemat !!! The corium would have to melt through the RPV, the containment vessel, and then through the concrete basemat It is about 5-10 meters thick (or so ?). An article from a meltdown testing facility stated it would take 28 days for the corium to melt through the D/W or basemat concrete. If the corium hit the basemat earlier this month, then we should be coming up toward the 28 days by the end of the month ???
    by wtm 5/17/2011 6:01:30 PM

  • oooooooo elaine.. let me email you a table..
    by dean 5/17/2011 6:01:43 PM

  • and see if you can post it..
    ok will it still not let you post !!?


    by dean edited by elainekirk 5/17/2011 6:01:48 PM

  • Maybe GIF the table, then post it as an embedded image?
    by Markfm 5/17/2011 6:03:26 PM

  • @Pedro, the basement is a lower building "work area". That's where all the pipes come and go, so water could have easily leaked into it.
    by wtm 5/17/2011 6:04:16 PM

  • elaine I just sent it.. and attached an excel file.. would you post it here please
    by dean 5/17/2011 6:05:32 PM

  • something for looking at and discussing
    by dean 5/17/2011 6:05:45 PM

  • markfm if you are talking to me.. yes it does include some manual action inervention... limited
    by dean 5/17/2011 6:06:56 PM

  • Awesome
    by Markfm 5/17/2011 6:07:13 PM

  • @wtm I'm not mixing them up. The basement is the lower area of the secondary containment structure which is made of concrete. It encloses the torus and the reactor. The basemat that you are referring to is the bottom layer of thick concrete of the basement but it's part of the same structure, the secondary containment. The suppression chamber (torus) is part of the primary containment vessel. Please check the schematics I've posted yesterday. www.nei.org
    by Pedro Jesus 5/17/2011 6:11:56 PM

  • yeah.. elaine..
    by dean 5/17/2011 6:14:09 PM

  • All times in minutes?
    by Markfm 5/17/2011 6:15:07 PM

  • @Pedro, The basement goes around the outside of the torus, it has walkways, piping, stairs, and doors in it. It is accessible to the work crews. The basemat is only underneath the reactor vessel. It is entirely concrete to the bedrock beneath it. It has no doors, piping, stairs, etc.
    by wtm 5/17/2011 6:15:37 PM

  • @all.. this chart was put together with the assumptions listed for each case 1, 2 and 3.. from standpoint of station blackout, and HPCI/RCIC/SORV
    systems
    by dean 5/17/2011 6:15:45 PM

  • time in minutes
    by dean 5/17/2011 6:15:50 PM

  • @Dean, what do the numbers "relate" too? Hours ?
    by wtm 5/17/2011 6:16:29 PM

  • Sorry, you posted as I was posting
    by wtm 5/17/2011 6:16:57 PM

  • the two notes on the bottom.. are... Drywell and Wetwell electric penetrations start to leak at T=204C - 400F and Drywell and Wetwell electric penetrations decompose and blow out of containment at T=260C - 500F
    by dean 5/17/2011 6:16:59 PM

  • does not take into account the damage to reactor vessel or systems as a result of EQ
    by dean 5/17/2011 6:18:01 PM

  • @nanci and all. I have Jorge Stolfi on chat connection. What exactly should I ask him about the Fukushima Plots?
    by Majj 5/17/2011 6:20:31 PM

  • my lap top battery is almost toast.. so if i cut out I will come back when I get home
    by dean 5/17/2011 6:20:52 PM

  • Perhaps one question is when he will be able to update the data?
    by Markfm 5/17/2011 6:21:11 PM

  • @Dean, can you elaborate on the electric penetrations in the Drywell/Wetwell area ?
    by wtm 5/17/2011 6:21:21 PM

  • Another good schematics from General Electric of BWR reactors. Also explains the different containment structures. Might be worth pinning along with the other one up there. www.nrc.gov
    by Pedro Jesus 5/17/2011 6:23:38 PM

  • @wtm @Pedro I think you two are talking about the same thing, Pedro's just including the basemat as a portion of the basement since it's at the same level, just filled solid, while @wtm considers the basement only as the 'void' portion. Otherwise, I think you two are on the same page.
    by jay 5/17/2011 6:25:41 PM

  • @jay Yes, we already came to that conclusion. Thanks anyway. =) But I never mentioned the base mat before, I don't understand where the confusion comes from.
    by Pedro Jesus 5/17/2011 6:29:21 PM

  • @dean Has anyone ever considered embedding sensors in the solid basemat or in the soil below? If not, how would an operator know if corium has penetrated it?
    by jay 5/17/2011 6:30:06 PM

  • Latest Video from TEPCO on plant status.

    by Rob in SF 5/17/2011 6:31:22 PM

  • @Pedro,Jay, just the names can get confusing, too similar ! The area I am talking about is in the cross section of the Mark I diagram, that Pedro posted. It is only that small area directly underneath the reactor. That is where the corium would eventually drop to, and it is all concrete between there and the bedrock. Although it is about 5-10 meters thick. With our luck TEPCO would have only poured it 5 meters instead of 10 meters.
    by wtm 5/17/2011 6:32:39 PM

  • From the diagrams I posted (one of which is pinned up) it is easy to visualize how the secondary containment surrounds all the others (the basement being the lower part of this containment and the base mat its floor), the primary containment surrounds the steel containment (the torus or suppression chamber being part of this one), the steel containment surrounds the RPV and the RPV contains the nuclear reactor where the fuel seats and does its magic (which in this case should be called black magic).
    by Pedro Jesus 5/17/2011 6:33:04 PM

  • @wtm Yes, I think we've got it clear now. Thank you. =)
    by Pedro Jesus 5/17/2011 6:33:42 PM

  • @Majj: In light of the release of these new data, could you ask what is his personal opinion about the core reaching watertable?
    by estacion 5/17/2011 6:34:04 PM

  • *corium
    by estacion 5/17/2011 6:34:29 PM

  • @estacion, that is the number 1 question !!!! I didn't know there was electric sensors down there, it would be good to know where and exactly what they do, so we could watch those sensors for activity. It might also be that some of those sensors are gone now, indicating that things have progressed in the meltdown in that area ?
    by wtm 5/17/2011 6:37:19 PM

  • @estacion I waiting his anser for the 1 subjetc, sun I get it I will send yours. I also invite hin and give the wiki link
    :-)))
    by Majj 5/17/2011 6:37:29 PM

  • Hey folks. In Paris now, and back on the ground. No time to look back through a few days of pages, can someone give me the short version of what TEPCO is owning up to now? Are they acknowledging worse conditions or meltdowns, or still kicking that can down the road?
    by bo 5/17/2011 6:39:02 PM

Japan Earthquake | Page 1234

Who's Blogging
  • hudebnikhudebnik
  • albleealblee
  • UKValUKVal
  • Jonathan KeeblerJonathan Keebler
  • Oliver (ScribbleLive)Oliver (ScribbleLive)
  • kaykodhkaykodh
  • MarkfmMarkfm
  • AngieAngie
  • Mid ValleyMid Valley
  • Matt (ScribbleLive)Matt (ScribbleLive)
  • George GibbGeorge Gibb
  • elainekirkelainekirk
  • PKelleyPKelley
  • lillymunsterlillymunster
  • deandean
  • bobo
  • EdanoEdano
  • DebDeb
  • Pedro Jesus
  • IanGoddardIanGoddard