
@RadioGuy that is for #4 also? All that excess radiation out #4 into the sea sort of goes against the #3 is the sole cause theory.
by lillymunster 8/28/2011 8:52:49 PM

We know for a fact #4 was hot, boiled dry and was burning off and on. So maybe the top looks fairly pristine because the fuel never itself exploded and wasn't the point of ignition?
by lillymunster 8/28/2011 8:54:00 PM

As in it had fuel melting, created the hydrogen but wasn't where it ignited. THere was also welding equipment in the building and possibly a solvent tank that could have added to the explosion.
by lillymunster 8/28/2011 8:54:52 PM

@lillymunster a piece of metal just getting hot can 'jump' so a piece of equipment getting radioactively hot would 'JUMP' and if it hit anything else metal as it 'jumped' ie inner framework the sparks would ignite the hydrogen?
by elainekirk 8/28/2011 8:54:53 PM

@elainekirk oooh.
by lillymunster 8/28/2011 8:55:53 PM

I need coffee..:-)
by lillymunster 8/28/2011 8:56:03 PM

it would be good to know where the old shroud was
by elainekirk 8/28/2011 9:03:35 PM

G'day @all
by hudebnik 8/28/2011 9:05:07 PM

@RadioGuy long ago I found reference to extra storage being applied for tepco wanted to store in 4 but we couldnt think where they would store
by elainekirk 8/28/2011 9:05:24 PM

Do you think the SFP Cs figures that Arnie G found a couple of days ago shed any light on things?
by hudebnik 8/28/2011 9:05:46 PM

@hudebnik greetings
by elainekirk 8/28/2011 9:05:49 PM

Hi @Elaine - we're at opposite sides of the globe at the moment!
by hudebnik 8/28/2011 9:07:34 PM

Hmm. the ones from August. ?
by lillymunster 8/28/2011 9:08:25 PM

@hudebnik are you visiting down under?
by elainekirk 8/28/2011 9:09:23 PM

@Elaine - I'm in NZ visiting our daughter and family
by hudebnik 8/28/2011 9:11:35 PM

I'll post Gundy's stuff in a minute, just finding it on a v. slow connection
by hudebnik 8/28/2011 9:12:16 PM

@RadioGuy I think that might be a Dean question..
by lillymunster 8/28/2011 9:12:49 PM

This is the Tepco document
www.tepco.co.jpby hudebnik 8/28/2011 9:14:20 PM

Maybe somebody could pls unlock it and post the contents? I'm on minimal facilities here!
by hudebnik 8/28/2011 9:17:33 PM

this doc could be useful it isnt your usual spent fuel doc
docs.google.comby elainekirk 8/28/2011 9:18:08 PM

@hudebnik just doing it
by elainekirk 8/28/2011 9:18:49 PM


@hudebnik is this what you wanted done ? :) www.tepco.co.jp
by elainekirk 8/28/2011 9:20:45 PM

@Elaine - TY!
by hudebnik 8/28/2011 9:21:49 PM

We need our experts on this but two things struck me - that #4SFP Cs is surprisingly low if there was any recriticality there, and that #2 is very high. The Cs in #2 can't have come from debris from the explosion in #3 because #2
still has a roof.
by hudebnik edited by elainekirk 8/28/2011 9:26:35 PM

Like most things from Tepco, curiouser and curiouser...
by hudebnik 8/28/2011 9:28:17 PM

@hudebnik as alice said ...
by elainekirk 8/28/2011 9:31:22 PM

@you reading the temps in the spent fuell doc suprised me as a non techi
by elainekirk 8/28/2011 9:32:06 PM

@Elaine - which temps?
by hudebnik 8/28/2011 9:35:39 PM

BTW our daughter here in NZ is called Alice ;)
by hudebnik 8/28/2011 9:36:26 PM

@hudebnik my youngest was going to be alice but somehow she became Jenny
by elainekirk 8/28/2011 9:49:07 PM

I'm going to take a break now - may pop up (much) later
by hudebnik 8/28/2011 10:08:56 PM