
Peter are you here
by dean 4/14/2011 9:29:19 PM

your right Tenzing...
by dean 4/14/2011 9:29:48 PM

I know people who live accross from a SIMPLOT ferterlizer plant and it belches so much SULPHER DIOXIDE it is like a fog,, worse when there are seasonal changes... well .. all the bridges and railroad trussel crossings have to be replaced at intervals because of the acidic affect of sulpher dioxide mixing with water in the air... you can sense it if you breath some times.. I dont' live there tho
by dean 4/14/2011 9:31:35 PM

I go on this one bicycle race in Idaho and the course goes right next to a huge cattle feed lot.. let me tell you on a 100 degree F day.. it's overwhelming.. peee ewwwwww
by dean 4/14/2011 9:32:21 PM

I can't open that unit 4 sfp file .. sign
by dean 4/14/2011 9:35:47 PM

good point Tenzing.. in my opinion.. nothing should be outside of CONTAINMENT that touches reactor water... turbine buildings etc.. should be able to withstand the same seismic and other requirements.. .
by dean 4/14/2011 9:38:48 PM

fukushima accident will redefine .. "defense in depth".. for protecting the fuel
by dean 4/14/2011 9:39:50 PM

that's so true Sin,,, and, imagine if we applied the same philosophy to coal mines or dupont chemical plants, or oil drilling... across the board. no industry has spent as much for safety as nuclear... of course the space shuttle program spend a ton of money.. ...
by dean 4/14/2011 9:52:03 PM

automobile industry.. probably can't even give the probability of an inadvertent failure of the breaks that would lead to 1 death.. we do accept risks in our lives.. many of which have disastrous consequences... one is a fire in the coal pile for a cole burner power plant.. or.. in the steel industry.. accidently dropping a huge laddel of liquid metal on the floor and watch the beams and colums melt
by dean 4/14/2011 9:53:41 PM

yes Edano.. in all industries with hazards...
by dean 4/14/2011 9:54:31 PM

I'm not trying to defend nuclear.. every industry is susceptible to risks..
by dean 4/14/2011 9:55:32 PM

bobby .. I think I disagree.. you can have birth defects with alot of chemicals used in the world today .and probably more from that than radiation
by dean 4/14/2011 9:56:12 PM

Sounds like this belongs on the organize board
by Markfm 4/14/2011 9:56:36 PM

Sin I was reading about some of the hazards of just a simple windmill.. and there have been many deaths, many instances of catastrophic failures that threw blades off which crashed to home... all energy sources have risk..
by dean 4/14/2011 9:57:39 PM

news and tech
by Markfm 4/14/2011 9:58:43 PM

90C
by Markfm 4/14/2011 9:59:13 PM

I will support Mark there
by elainekirk 4/14/2011 9:59:40 PM